Exceeding max tyre pressure
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,811
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3526 Post(s)
Liked 2,936 Times
in
1,780 Posts
Originally Posted by smd4
"Boilers are tested at four times the maximum allowable working pressure....."
Bull!
As one who was a journeyman Boilermaker, having completed my apprenticeship at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, and had a qualification (Test Director) to hydrostatically test them- (meaning my name went on the bottom of the test forum)
Every 5 years a boiler is required to have a strength test at 150%. NOTHING higher.
If it was relatively minor repair or maintenance, then 125%.
"Boilers are tested at four times the maximum allowable working pressure....."
Bull!
As one who was a journeyman Boilermaker, having completed my apprenticeship at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, and had a qualification (Test Director) to hydrostatically test them- (meaning my name went on the bottom of the test forum)
Every 5 years a boiler is required to have a strength test at 150%. NOTHING higher.
If it was relatively minor repair or maintenance, then 125%.
I thought you had me on your ignore list? Which I considered a great honor. I'd hate to be one of the few people here who isn't on it. Can you please put me back on? This place was much more enjoyable when I didn’t need to hear from you.
Last edited by smd4; 12-15-23 at 07:23 AM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,918
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,945 Times
in
1,220 Posts
Originally Posted by smd4
"Boilers are tested at four times the maximum allowable working pressure....."
Bull!
As one who was a journeyman Boilermaker, having completed my apprenticeship at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, and had a qualification (Test Director) to hydrostatically test them- (meaning my name went on the bottom of the test forum)
Every 5 years a boiler is required to have a strength test at 150%. NOTHING higher.
If it was relatively minor repair or maintenance, then 125%.
"Boilers are tested at four times the maximum allowable working pressure....."
Bull!
As one who was a journeyman Boilermaker, having completed my apprenticeship at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, and had a qualification (Test Director) to hydrostatically test them- (meaning my name went on the bottom of the test forum)
Every 5 years a boiler is required to have a strength test at 150%. NOTHING higher.
If it was relatively minor repair or maintenance, then 125%.
#29
It's MY mountain
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4339 Post(s)
Liked 2,983 Times
in
1,619 Posts
Bangor/Bremerton was some good duty.
Likes For KerryIrons:
#32
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Normally an excellent idea, but they are already full of sealant, and the place I live isn't exactly a great market for tubeless gravel tires.
I tried running at 60psi and 55psi both. I think i'll stick with 55: there is noticeably less squish and it seems cromulent enough.
Kenda is actually a pretty great tyre: on category 2 gravel/lose hardpack it hold very well, and I like how it rolls too.
I'll probably get a set of Maxxis ramblers in 37c (biggest my frames can fit) and see how that one goes.
I tried running at 60psi and 55psi both. I think i'll stick with 55: there is noticeably less squish and it seems cromulent enough.
Kenda is actually a pretty great tyre: on category 2 gravel/lose hardpack it hold very well, and I like how it rolls too.
I'll probably get a set of Maxxis ramblers in 37c (biggest my frames can fit) and see how that one goes.
#34
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Tyre sidewall is considerably more resilient than tube.
#35
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ok, it gets interesting - one tyre started to lose pressure fairly rapidly and detached from the rim (while standing, mind you).
Not very sure if it is a tyre failure or dodgy valve (stan's kit valves are very meh), but that is not the plan.
I wonder if excess pressure (i did run it at 60) cause bead to stretch? Anyway, I'll replace valve and see how it goes from there.
Not very sure if it is a tyre failure or dodgy valve (stan's kit valves are very meh), but that is not the plan.
I wonder if excess pressure (i did run it at 60) cause bead to stretch? Anyway, I'll replace valve and see how it goes from there.
#37
Senior Member
[QUOTE=ambaal;23100463]Hi everyone.
I recently got myself in a fairly stupid situation: i've purchased 2 kits of Kenda Alluvium 700x35c to fit on my gravel and not-so-cyclocross bikes.
Now, by itself nothing wrong with this, but there are two problems:
1. I'm about 125kg/280lbs heavy. Bike is another 10-12kgs depending on how much water i have.
2. Max rated pressure on Kenda Alluvium of any size is 50psi. I didn't check it before buying and it's a non-returnable purchase (they both are also already fitted and with sealant inside anyway).
I run them tubeless, on 17mm and 19mm internal width rims (rims are rated much higher, i used to be riding 75 tubed on 33mm tires before, constant pinch flats below 60). I mostly ride a mix of category 2 gravel and paved roads to get there.
While riding at 50psi seems to be possible (i did couple of rides and nothing bad happened so far), the tires do look like they could use some more air. As in i'm pretty uncomfortable with how much they deform even under static load.
Now, all tyre pressure calculators suggest around 55-60psi. I tried them at 60psi, and it seems like a sweet spot for my weight: good contact patch, good rolling. But it's 10psi or 20% above tyre limit.
I contacted Kenda and their reply was pretty much 'welp bad luck dude, we already have your money nice knowing you'
So, questions I have:
1. Is it OK to go 5-10PSI (that would be +10%-20% above max tyre pressure) above max?
2. Should i be riding on 50psi instead and not bother with tires looking half-flat?
The side wall pressure is an unreliable guide and 1/2 of the pressure needed to blow the tire off of the rim. If 60 in the rear works you can run less in the front because of weight distribution. Less weight on the front wheel allows less pressure and a more comfortable ride.
I recently got myself in a fairly stupid situation: i've purchased 2 kits of Kenda Alluvium 700x35c to fit on my gravel and not-so-cyclocross bikes.
Now, by itself nothing wrong with this, but there are two problems:
1. I'm about 125kg/280lbs heavy. Bike is another 10-12kgs depending on how much water i have.
2. Max rated pressure on Kenda Alluvium of any size is 50psi. I didn't check it before buying and it's a non-returnable purchase (they both are also already fitted and with sealant inside anyway).
I run them tubeless, on 17mm and 19mm internal width rims (rims are rated much higher, i used to be riding 75 tubed on 33mm tires before, constant pinch flats below 60). I mostly ride a mix of category 2 gravel and paved roads to get there.
While riding at 50psi seems to be possible (i did couple of rides and nothing bad happened so far), the tires do look like they could use some more air. As in i'm pretty uncomfortable with how much they deform even under static load.
Now, all tyre pressure calculators suggest around 55-60psi. I tried them at 60psi, and it seems like a sweet spot for my weight: good contact patch, good rolling. But it's 10psi or 20% above tyre limit.
I contacted Kenda and their reply was pretty much 'welp bad luck dude, we already have your money nice knowing you'
So, questions I have:
1. Is it OK to go 5-10PSI (that would be +10%-20% above max tyre pressure) above max?
2. Should i be riding on 50psi instead and not bother with tires looking half-flat?
The side wall pressure is an unreliable guide and 1/2 of the pressure needed to blow the tire off of the rim. If 60 in the rear works you can run less in the front because of weight distribution. Less weight on the front wheel allows less pressure and a more comfortable ride.
#38
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
tire pressure
you need to pump up these wider tires to recomended tire pressures,the tire may not pop but with over inflation the rims can split at the sides,Roger Musson has done a few articles about just that,40 psi is the limit,skinny road rims are made for very high pressures,wider rims are not
#39
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
you need to pump up these wider tires to recomended tire pressures,the tire may not pop but with over inflation the rims can split at the sides,Roger Musson has done a few articles about just that,40 psi is the limit,skinny road rims are made for very high pressures,wider rims are not
My main concern is sidewall blowout. But thinking of it, if casing starts to rupture, it usually forms a bulge first, and seen as I have about 2mm clearance from frame, it probably would be hard to miss.
#40
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
tire pressure
if that rim states it will handle that pressure than its fine,its allways good to not go way beyond the specs cheers,alot of those earlier single walled rims cant do much over 40 psi,they do split at the rim sidewall cheers
#41
Senior Member