Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Puzzled by chain length

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Puzzled by chain length

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-26 | 02:52 PM
  #1  
hrdknox1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 216
Likes: 61
Puzzled by chain length

I have been running 11 speed Sram eTap with 53/39 chainrings and 11/25 cassette and 53 link chain length. I just built a new bike with Sram eTap utilizing 1X setup with 52 chainring and 11/28 cassette. I cut the chain for the 1X bike to 53 links, the same number of links on my 2X bike. On the 1X bike the derailleur will not shift to the 25 and 28 cogs with 53 link chain. It requires 55 link chain to shift upwards to the 25 and 28 cogs. . I am puzzled why my 1X bike requires 55 links when the gearing is similar to my 2X bike.
I assume the derailleur is adjusted properly because it shifts to the 25 and 28 cogs without the chain attached.
hrdknox1 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-10-26 | 03:13 PM
  #2  
maddog34's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 3,199
From: NW Oregon

Bikes: 1982 Trek 930R Custom, '91 Diamondback Ascent w/ XT, XTR updates, Fuji Team Pro CF road flyer, Specialized Sirrus Gravel Convert, '09 Comencal Meta 5.5 XC, '02 Marin MBX500, '84 Gitane Criterium bike

53t to 52t equals one Half a thread pitch shorter.
rear 3t increase equals 1.5 thread pitches longer.
basic bike-ology, 101
there are no half links (actually ONE full pitch length) for multi-speed bike chains, that I've seen.

and you count links wrong, or your bike is insanely tiny.

can i assume that you meant 106 links, and 110 links?... and you might want to go re-count now.
off bike, i count just the outer plates, then add one to account for the Quick link/Master link... then multiply by two.
maddog34 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-10-26 | 05:14 PM
  #3  
rccardr's Avatar
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
15 Anniversary
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 6,290
Also check the chainstay length, the 1X bike might be a little longer.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Reply
Old 02-10-26 | 11:00 PM
  #4  
Kontact's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,629
Likes: 4,781
Are they the exact same derailleur?

Generally, you don't go by the number of links because of the differences in chainstay length and rear derailleur design. You read the rear derailleur instructions.
Kontact is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 12:16 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 511
Likes: 411
From: San Francisco - it used to be nice

Bikes: 1970 Alex Singer, 63 Hetchins, 75 Motobecane Townie, more . . .

You really need to go to Park Tool website and watch a good video on this.

The only time I've ever encountered someone who went by the number of links or measured length was an old-timer who used a 1" pitch Block chain.
vintage cellar is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 04:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 937
From: South Jersey
You took away one tooth from the front and added 3 teeth in the rear and you're puzzled by why the chain needs to be longer? More teeth require more chain and chainstay length also affects the length of the chain. Never cut a chain until you have measured it on the bike.
dsaul is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 06:09 AM
  #7  
hrdknox1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 216
Likes: 61
Originally Posted by Kontact
Are they the exact same derailleur?

Generally, you don't go by the number of links because of the differences in chainstay length and rear derailleur design. You read the rear derailleur instructions.
The rear derailleur is the same. I just read the instructions from Sram for the derailleur and it says to add two extra links for a 1X setup. I will try that and see if it works.
hrdknox1 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 06:27 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,822
Likes: 1,451
From: UK
Didn't you already say that it works with 55 (110) links? Or was that also based on the doc, not testing it?
choddo is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 07:55 AM
  #9  
grumpus's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 3,816
Likes: 1,757
Originally Posted by hrdknox1
I am puzzled why my 1X bike requires 55 links when the gearing is similar to my 2X bike.
Different frame, different chainstays - you can't expect the chain length to be the same simply because the gearing is the same. Just measure the chain against the bike you're fitting it to - big/big and add a few links, if you're not sure leave it a bit long and see how it works (easier to remove a couple of links than add them. BTW you're counting links wrong - an inner link and its neighbour outer link is two links, not one, new chains are typically 116 or 118 links.
grumpus is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 08:08 AM
  #10  
djb
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,903
Likes: 1,241
From: Montreal Canada
Watch and follow instructions. Reliable source. Should clear things up for you.


Last edited by djb; 02-11-26 at 08:17 PM.
djb is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 08:30 AM
  #11  
Kontact's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,629
Likes: 4,781
Originally Posted by hrdknox1
The rear derailleur is the same. I just read the instructions from Sram for the derailleur and it says to add two extra links for a 1X setup. I will try that and see if it works.
That is odd that SRAM has 1x instructions for a 2x rear derailleur when they make 1x specific rear derailleurs.
Kontact is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 11:13 AM
  #12  
hrdknox1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 216
Likes: 61
Originally Posted by Kontact
That is odd that SRAM has 1x instructions for a 2x rear derailleur when they make 1x specific rear derailleurs.
Actually the instructions say for 2X systems add 1 outer and inner link and for 1X systems add 2 outer and inner links.
hrdknox1 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 11:20 AM
  #13  
hrdknox1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 216
Likes: 61
Originally Posted by choddo
Didn't you already say that it works with 55 (110) links? Or was that also based on the doc, not testing it?
Yes it works with 110 links (55) but according to the Sram manual I should use 108 links. I now have done that and it works. I guess next time I should read the manual.
hrdknox1 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 12:01 PM
  #14  
hrdknox1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 216
Likes: 61
Originally Posted by rccardr
Also check the chainstay length, the 1X bike might be a little longer.
Yes. Chainstay lengths are the same.
hrdknox1 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 12:10 PM
  #15  
zandoval's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 2,460
From: Bastrop Texas

Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites

Originally Posted by hrdknox1
...I am puzzled why my 1X bike requires 55 links when the gearing is similar to my 2X bike...
Thinking about what it takes to change a chain length is easy. Look at the distances. As little as 3mm can force you to add or reduce a link. And one link usually means two, Ha. The chain length calculators just get you into the ball park. Just get it right and be satisfied, as I am sure you have done.

Of further note, all my bikes are Franken Bikes. I no longer get puzzled of the fact that even though they are set up similarly, chain length has been determined by trail and error...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
zandoval is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 07:27 PM
  #16  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,612
Likes: 1,862
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

I have no clue how many links are on any of my bikes because I don't need to.
I size the chain to fit the bike and toss the rest into the "extra pieces of chain that will probably not get used" pile.
Put it on the biggest ring & cog and make sure you have enough slack so the chain can ride over the teeth to the next ring/cog.



As far as chain stays the same length? That may be, but with some of the futuristic styling, where does the CS start?
Is the distance from the center of the rear axle to the center of the ring(s) the same?

Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 02-11-26 at 07:31 PM.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 08:03 PM
  #17  
Kontact's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,629
Likes: 4,781
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
As far as chain stays the same length? That may be, but with some of the futuristic styling, where does the CS start?
Is the distance from the center of the rear axle to the center of the ring(s) the same?
Yes, "chainstay length" is generally defined by the center to center distance from the BB to the hub axle. On geometry charts, it appears that the horizontal dropouts are measured from the front location rather the back of the dropout, but that is just in the handful I've measured.
Kontact is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 08:17 PM
  #18  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,612
Likes: 1,862
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Originally Posted by Kontact
Yes, "chainstay length" is generally defined by the center to center distance from the BB to the hub axle. On geometry charts, it appears that the horizontal dropouts are measured from the front location rather the back of the dropout, but that is just in the handful I've measured.
But does the OP know that?
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-26 | 11:33 PM
  #19  
Kontact's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,629
Likes: 4,781
Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
But does the OP know that?
No idea. But he does now.

You don't need to know how to measure chainstay length if you have the geo charts from the manufacturer. They all measure it the same way.
Kontact is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-26 | 08:18 AM
  #20  
Steel Charlie's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1,896
From: NorCal
Dear OP
Ignore the usual blather of who GAF extraneous info, watch the video, put the chain on the bike, and cut the chain to fit the bike as it is currently configured. No measurements or calculations are necessary.

If you don't know what you're doing get some assistance from someone who actually does.

Have a nice day
Steel Charlie is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.