Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Bicycle Mechanics (https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-mechanics/)
-   -   Stupid Terminology (https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-mechanics/330910-stupid-terminology.html)

Bob Dopolina 08-22-07 02:57 AM


Originally Posted by Sluggo (Post 5048089)
Nobody but the purists make the distinction between clinchers and wire-ons anymore.

Assembly factories still do. And there are 2 types of wired-on clinchers to boot!:eek:

HillRider 08-22-07 07:32 AM


Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina (Post 5120286)
I thought scandium was just an element the Russians starting adding to aluminium in fighters? Isn't it just another alloy? What does 100% Scandium mean?

That's exactly what Scandium is, an alloying element added at a low level to Aluminum to improve its grain structure and strength. Scandium itself is about $3000/pound so, even if it was usable as the sole material in a frame, who could afford it?

Obviously there are no true "100% Scandium" frames. I expect the Marketing jargon means all of the frame tubes are a Scandium containing Al alloy.

gcl8a 08-22-07 07:46 AM


Originally Posted by halfspeed (Post 5047946)
Nah, it's a 'rear triangle' (although there are actually two, but that's another rant). There's no such thing as a 'rear fork'.

And of course the front triangle, on many bikes, isn't a triangle at all. Just as the whole bike is not a diamond shape.

DMF 08-22-07 11:58 AM


Originally Posted by Tapeworm21 (Post 5120272)
Chainstay.

Never understood why we call it that. The chain stays off to the side of the bike. Not part of the rear triangle.

No no no no no.

A "stay" is a structural element intended to brace a primary load-bearing element. On a sailing ship a stay is a fixed line bracing a mast. On a truss it's one of those diagonal pieces.

On a bicycle the stays brace the rear axle mounts. There are two pairs: one running from the seat to the dropouts - the seat stays, and one running alongside the chain - the chain stays. Chain stays brace the axle mount against the pedaling force transmitted by the chain.

So "chain stay" is one of the better terms used on a bike. Not stupid at all.

gcl8a 08-22-07 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by DMF (Post 5122689)
A "stay" is a structural element intended to brace a primary load-bearing element. On a sailing ship a stay is a fixed line bracing a mast. On a truss it's one of those diagonal pieces.

So what's the primary load-bearing element that the stays are bracing?

SoonerBent 08-22-07 12:58 PM

Derailleur. The purpose of a derailleur is to put the chain on the desired cog or ring. Not to de-rail, which would mean to have it off of the cog or ring.

CdCf 08-22-07 01:05 PM


Originally Posted by SoonerBent (Post 5123074)
Derailleur. The purpose of a derailleur is to put the chain on the desired cog or ring. Not to de-rail, which would mean to have it off of the cog or ring.

Hmm, but to get the chain off the previous sprocket, it'd have to derail the chain, now wouldn't it?

Kotts 08-22-07 01:12 PM


Originally Posted by HillRider (Post 5038242)
That's in the same league as "if the plural of mouse is mice why isn't the plural of house hice?

...or the plural of spouse, spice?

gcl8a 08-22-07 01:22 PM


Originally Posted by CdCf (Post 5123118)
Hmm, but to get the chain off the previous sprocket, it'd have to derail the chain, now wouldn't it?

And then rerail it...

And is it even riding on rails, anyway?

CdCf 08-22-07 02:10 PM

"De/resprocketer" probably didn't catch on... ;)

MyBikeGotStolen 08-22-07 02:25 PM

Could it just be a "rerailer"?

SoonerBent 08-22-07 02:30 PM


Originally Posted by CdCf (Post 5123118)
Hmm, but to get the chain off the previous sprocket, it'd have to derail the chain, now wouldn't it?

Yes but if it only derailed and didn't rerail you wouldn't be very happy would you?

Old Dirt Hill 08-22-07 02:35 PM


Originally Posted by halfspeed (Post 5047946)
Nah, it's a 'rear triangle' (although there are actually two, but that's another rant). There's no such thing as a 'rear fork'.

Sheldon disagrees with you.
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_e-f.html#fork
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_e-f.html#forkend

Sorry. ;)

redtires 08-22-07 03:22 PM

So.......if I were to list the specifications of my bike in a manner NOT associated with variable bike riding groups, it may read something like this:

-Chromoly metal alloy constructed in a double triangle fashion. Tube joining by non-ferrous metal brazing.
-Ritchey handletubes with radius bends.
-Titec TIG welded Titanium handletube to frame attachment apparatus with a 12cm extension.
-Campagnolo integrated shift and brake actuator mechanisms.
-Sella Italia Flite human rider support module
-Ritchey Pro rider support module to frame attachment apparatus in a 27.2 OD application
-Campagnolo front and rear ratio adjustment devices
-Campagnolo front and rear speed modulation devices
-XRP Pro circular rotation device featuring 24 tensioned support struts each.
-Continental pneumatic traction control devices
-Ritchey Pro dual linear multiple link articulating drive compatible leverage beams in a 175mm length application. Dual ratio defined as two compatible gear wheels in a 39 tooth and a 53 tooth ratio. Opposite beam attachment is achieved through a splined, tubular ferrous metal spindle supported by sealed cartridge style ball bearings. Mechanism to frame attachment achieved by the use of two (one left, one right) threaded bearing support cups.
-Rear forward momentum ratio adjustments through nine linear multiple link articulating drive compatible gear wheels. Various tooth ratios available.
-Rider foot supports are attached to the 175 leverage beams through the use of threaded ferrous spindle (solid) which fitted with multiple sealed cartridge type ball bearings and a spring tension engagement/release plate.


This took me a long time...my brain hurts...I'm sorry I even started this post...."boo" to the OP. :lol:

moxfyre 08-22-07 03:34 PM


Originally Posted by BearSquirrel (Post 5034969)
Personally, I refuse to use the term "clipless". I use "strapless pedals".

Yeah... I've struggled with this one too. To explain these to my non-cyclist friends, I usually call them "clip-in pedals" or "pedals that lock to your shoes like ski bindings."

The term "clipless" makes sense historically, but it's endlessly confusing :/

gmason 08-22-07 04:19 PM


Originally Posted by stevegor (Post 5038126)
If "Bicycle" is pronounced as "Bi-sick-al", why isn't "Cycling" pronounced "sick-ling"?

Why do we park on driveways and drive on parkways? We are destroying the language. For centuries now. :rolleyes:

BTW, didn't Sheldon Brown coin the word brifter?

Finally, at least tubulars are correctly called sewups.

Sheldon Brown 08-22-07 04:53 PM


Originally Posted by gmason (Post 5124511)
BTW, didn't Sheldon Brown coin the word brifter?

No I didn't! I don't know where that persistent slander came from, but it wasn't me!

I do take full credit for "stokid" and for the spelling "derailer" though.

Sheldon "Briftless" Brown
Code:

+----------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human.  |
|  At best he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear  |
|  shoes, bathe, and not make messes in the house.              |
|                                        --Robert A. Heinlein  |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+


rmfnla 08-22-07 05:15 PM


Originally Posted by gcl8a (Post 5032737)
However handlebars actually are tubes, not bars.

Except that there is only one tube so it should be singular; handlebar.

gmason 08-22-07 05:39 PM


Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown (Post 5124693)
No I didn't! I don't know where that persistent slander came from, but it wasn't me! ...

And just the minimal search of your site shows that you credit Bruce Frech with that.

But it isn't everyone who would turn down such fame! :p

moxfyre 08-22-07 05:47 PM


Originally Posted by redtires (Post 5124091)
So.......if I were to list the specifications of my bike in a manner NOT associated with variable bike riding groups, it may read something like this:

-Chromoly metal alloy constructed in a double triangle fashion. Tube joining by non-ferrous metal brazing.
-Ritchey handletubes with radius bends.
-Titec TIG welded Titanium handletube to frame attachment apparatus with a 12cm extension.
-Campagnolo integrated shift and brake actuator mechanisms.
-Sella Italia Flite human rider support module
-Ritchey Pro rider support module to frame attachment apparatus in a 27.2 OD application
-Campagnolo front and rear ratio adjustment devices
-Campagnolo front and rear speed modulation devices
-XRP Pro circular rotation device featuring 24 tensioned support struts each.
-Continental pneumatic traction control devices
-Ritchey Pro dual linear multiple link articulating drive compatible leverage beams in a 175mm length application. Dual ratio defined as two compatible gear wheels in a 39 tooth and a 53 tooth ratio. Opposite beam attachment is achieved through a splined, tubular ferrous metal spindle supported by sealed cartridge style ball bearings. Mechanism to frame attachment achieved by the use of two (one left, one right) threaded bearing support cups.
-Rear forward momentum ratio adjustments through nine linear multiple link articulating drive compatible gear wheels. Various tooth ratios available.
-Rider foot supports are attached to the 175 leverage beams through the use of threaded ferrous spindle (solid) which fitted with multiple sealed cartridge type ball bearings and a spring tension engagement/release plate.


This took me a long time...my brain hurts...I'm sorry I even started this post...."boo" to the OP. :lol:

I think you have a really good point, actually! Removing the bike-specific terminology makes it hard for knowledgeable bike mechanics to understand what you're describing, while not really making it any easier for anyone else to understand, either.

So in that sense, the terminology is useful, because it succinctly and unambiguously identifies bike components to people who need to understand them. Really the only cases where it causes confusion are where there's a conflict with a more general meaning of the word, such as "clipless" pedals, or "saddle" instead of seat.

I also dislike the term "bottom bracket", which I had heard bike mechanics say many, many times before I had any clue what it meant myself. I don't know how it's a "bracket", and it's not really at the "bottom" of the bike either. I don't know why we don't just call it the "crank bearing and spindle." But that's probably just me :rolleyes:

moxfyre 08-22-07 06:09 PM


Originally Posted by Sheldon Brown (Post 5124693)
No I didn't! I don't know where that persistent slander came from, but it wasn't me!

I do take full credit for "stokid" and for the spelling "derailer" though.

Sheldon "Briftless" Brown

I must take this opportunity to thank you for "derailer." I only spell it this way now. Despite being a certified Francophile, I think that "derailleur" looks really silly and unnecessary in English. It's not like it adds any subtlety of meaning, like peloton or domestique, or some of the other interesting French terms in cycling.

moxfyre 08-22-07 06:17 PM


Originally Posted by CdCf (Post 5119991)
At the bike shop where I work, we sell a couple of models designated as "0-speed"! They're really 1-speed, of course, but someone didn't quite think it through... :D

Yeah, I think it's funny how single-speed or fixed-gear bikes are said to have "no" gears :)

halfspeed 08-22-07 07:46 PM


Originally Posted by Old Dirt Hill (Post 5123740)

That's funny, because I agree with him that "The term "rear fork" is sometimes used to refer to the part of the frame that holds the rear wheel." That doesn't mean that I think it's sane or useful, though.

LWaB 09-24-07 06:16 AM


Originally Posted by gcl8a (Post 5122908)
So what's the primary load-bearing element that the stays are bracing?

A wheel probably counts as the primary load-bearing element on a vehicle.

LWaB 09-24-07 06:19 AM


Originally Posted by Wordbiker (Post 5047725)
I wondered why certain components were called "campy"...so I looked up the definition:

Of course, some of us ride "Campag" components...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.