SRAM PG830 vs PG850 interchange?
#1
Dropped From The Pack
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 12
Bikes: 97 RockHopper (steel is real)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
SRAM PG830 vs PG850 interchange?
Hi all,
I'm looking to assemble a custom 8-speed cassette. Do you know if the sprocket and spacer widths are the same for the PG830 and the PG850 cassettes? Has anyone ever mixed cogs from these two cassettes?
I'm looking to assemble a custom 8-speed cassette. Do you know if the sprocket and spacer widths are the same for the PG830 and the PG850 cassettes? Has anyone ever mixed cogs from these two cassettes?
#2
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,219 Times
in
2,366 Posts
If there are differences they are probably minor. I think the difference between the cassettes is in materials but 8 speed cogs are all the same width as are the spacers (within a manufacturing group)
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#3
Dropped From The Pack
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 12
Bikes: 97 RockHopper (steel is real)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Following up on my old post... Yes, they are the same thickness. The Performance house brand 8-speed cassette also has the same thickness cogs.
I now have a custom frankencog that works great....
I now have a custom frankencog that works great....
#4
Sometimes on pedals
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I was looking for a new cassette for my old MTB and I thought SRAM PG 850 looks good. Then I noticed there is also PG 830, but I did not find a difference. This caused some confusion.
So, I wanted to know what is the difference if there is any. Then I found an old SRAM document. And the specifications look identical. Except that there is something.
There are three versions of PG 830:
Now I wonder what would be the best option to get a 12-32T version that would have the sprockets 12-13-14-16-18-21-26-32. Because I think I don't really need an 11T sprocket.
So, I wanted to know what is the difference if there is any. Then I found an old SRAM document. And the specifications look identical. Except that there is something.
There are three versions of PG 830:
- MTB 11–32T with sprockets 11-12-14-16-18-21-26-32
- MTB 11–30T with sprockets 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30
- MTB 11–28T with sprockets 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28
- MTB 11–32T with sprockets 11-12-14-16-18-21-26-32
- MTB 11–30T with sprockets 11-13-15-17-20-23-26-30
- MTB 11–28T with sprockets 11-12-14-16-18-21-24-28
- Road 12–26T with sprockets 12-13-15-17-19-21-23-26
- Road 12-23T with sprockets 12-13-14-15-17-19-21-23
Now I wonder what would be the best option to get a 12-32T version that would have the sprockets 12-13-14-16-18-21-26-32. Because I think I don't really need an 11T sprocket.
#5
Really Old Senior Member
Don't be afraid to look at other Shimano compatible brands.
Likely the differences between the 830 & 850 is likely finish and/or weight.
You could -
Use the 6 largest cogs from option 1 of either the 830 or 850.
Add the 2 smallest cogs from option 5, of the 850.
To be honest, you could probably sneak in a Shimano cog or 2 if you really need to.
OR
Just buy this-
https://bikable.com/parts/cassettes/...rew-ring-13-32
Likely the differences between the 830 & 850 is likely finish and/or weight.
You could -
Use the 6 largest cogs from option 1 of either the 830 or 850.
Add the 2 smallest cogs from option 5, of the 850.
To be honest, you could probably sneak in a Shimano cog or 2 if you really need to.
OR
Just buy this-
https://bikable.com/parts/cassettes/...rew-ring-13-32
Last edited by Bill Kapaun; 12-11-23 at 04:52 AM.
Likes For Bill Kapaun:
Likes For alcjphil:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,706
Bikes: Trek 730 (quad), 720 & 830, Bike Friday NWT, Brompton M36R & M6R, Dahon HAT060 & HT060, ...
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 840 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
251 Posts
There is more to cogs than thickness and spacing. The teeth on neighboring cogs are shaped to work together in upshifts and downshifts. The tips of teeth can be positioned differently within the thickness of a cog. My experience with mixing cogs from different cassettes has been mixed. The shift quality often deteriorated enough to offset the expected gains from more optimal gear ratios.