Fork Rake question
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Bikes: Kestrel RT900SL, 1975 Viner, Specialized StumpJumper
Fork Rake question
I am about to start a Cinelli build. The fork that came with the frame is a 45deg. Tusk fork. I have an Easton EC90 SLx fork that I would like to use, but it is a 43 deg. rake. What would be the effect on handling, ride characteristics, etc... if I were to use the Easton fork? I suppose the stock 45deg. fork was matched to the frame based on geometry specs? Should I just use the original fork?
Thanks.
Thanks.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
First the rake is measured in millimeters, not degrees.
The change from 45 mm to 43 mm would have the effect of slowing the steering response and increasing straight line stability. But the difference from this change would be very slight and almost insignificant. I expect if you rode the two forks back-to-back you'd be hard pressed to tell which had which rake.
The change from 45 mm to 43 mm would have the effect of slowing the steering response and increasing straight line stability. But the difference from this change would be very slight and almost insignificant. I expect if you rode the two forks back-to-back you'd be hard pressed to tell which had which rake.
#3
Decrepit Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California
Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts
I am about to start a Cinelli build. The fork that came with the frame is a 45deg. Tusk fork. I have an Easton EC90 SLx fork that I would like to use, but it is a 43 deg. rake. What would be the effect on handling, ride characteristics, etc... if I were to use the Easton fork? I suppose the stock 45deg. fork was matched to the frame based on geometry specs? Should I just use the original fork?
Thanks.
Thanks.

The 43mm rake of the EC90 SLx will give you a hair more trail than the original 45mm rake fork, resulting in an ever so slight improvement in stability at the expense of an ever so slight reduction in steering quickness. I'll bet you won't notice the difference.
EDIT - Damn, HillRider, you're fast (and accurate).
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 9
From: Oklahoma
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
I had an opportunity to replace my Ouzo Pro 43 mm rake fork with an Ouzo Pro 40 mm rake fork. Every thing except the rake remained the same. I could definitely feel the difference on the first ride, but it was not a huge difference. I elected to stay with the 40 mm because the bike (Trek 5500) has a steep head tube angle and I thought needed more trail.
Al
Al
#6
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,301
Likes: 14
From: La La Land (We love it!)
Bikes: Gilmour road, Curtlo road; both steel (of course)
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!






