Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

110 vs 130 BCD

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

110 vs 130 BCD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-08 | 11:47 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
110 vs 130 BCD

Can someone help me out? I would like to know what the benefits / disadvantages are for the 110 and 130 chainrings.

I ride a recumbent and I suppose one of the reasons for the 110BCD original equipment is to allow for a very small granny ring. I comes with a 24T ring. Seems that the smallest I can get in the 130BCD is a 30T. Is that the limits of the rationale? or is there something more to be considered.
BigAlMN is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-08 | 11:51 AM
  #2  
invisiblehand's Avatar
Part-time epistemologist
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,870
Likes: 3
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Jamis Nova, Bike Friday triplet, Bike Friday NWT, STRIDA, Austro Daimler Vent Noir, Hollands Tourer

Originally Posted by BigAlMN
Can someone help me out? I would like to know what the benefits / disadvantages are for the 110 and 130 chainrings.

I ride a recumbent and I suppose one of the reasons for the 110BCD original equipment is to allow for a very small granny ring. I comes with a 24T ring. Seems that the smallest I can get in the 130BCD is a 30T. Is that the limits of the rationale? or is there something more to be considered.
Is this a double? Typically the BCD for the granny ring is 74 BCD for either standard road (130 BCD) or compact (110 BCD) rings. For instance, my Sugino triple is 110/74 BCD.
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
invisiblehand is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-08 | 11:57 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Ah yes, I failed to be complete in my 'technical description'.
No, I have a road triple. And the granny gear is a 74BCD; you are correct.
But the question remains; is there a reason for choosing a 110 vs a 130?
BigAlMN is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-08 | 12:15 PM
  #4  
04jtb's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: West Dorset, UK

Bikes: 1983 Dawes Galaxy, 2006 Raleigh Airlite, 1982 Sun Solo (fixed)

110 only goes up to about 50t IIRC
130 goes higher
__________________
Originally Posted by cc700
i jam my thumbs up and back into the tubes. this way i can point my fingers straight out in front to split the wind and attain an even more aero profile, and the usual fixed gear - zen - connectedness feeling through the drivetrain is multiplied ten fold because my thumbs become one with the tubing.
A group for all Dawes Galaxy owners to give and recieve information about them
https://flickr.com/groups/dawes_galaxy/
04jtb is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-08 | 01:59 PM
  #5  
invisiblehand's Avatar
Part-time epistemologist
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,870
Likes: 3
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Jamis Nova, Bike Friday triplet, Bike Friday NWT, STRIDA, Austro Daimler Vent Noir, Hollands Tourer

Originally Posted by BigAlMN
Ah yes, I failed to be complete in my 'technical description'.
No, I have a road triple. And the granny gear is a 74BCD; you are correct.
But the question remains; is there a reason for choosing a 110 vs a 130?
Your middle ring can be smaller on the 110 BCD crank.

https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/chainrings/110.html
https://sheldonbrown.com/harris/chainrings/130.html
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
invisiblehand is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-08 | 03:14 PM
  #6  
top506's Avatar
Death fork? Naaaah!!
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,535
Likes: 961
From: The other Maine, north of RT 2

Bikes: Seriously downsizing.

Originally Posted by 04jtb
110 only goes up to about 50t IIRC
130 goes higher
Plenty of 52/53t 110s out there, but none are Biopace, alas
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.

(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
top506 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-08 | 03:39 PM
  #7  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,668
Likes: 1,905
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

On the largest sized rings, there would be less "ring flex" with the 130's vs 110's.
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Reply
Old 07-03-08 | 09:49 PM
  #8  
Jeff Wills's Avatar
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,165
Likes: 1,133
From: other Vancouver
Originally Posted by 04jtb
110 only goes up to about 50t IIRC
130 goes higher
Not true. 110bcd rings can gotten up to 73 teeth off the shelf:
https://hostelshoppe.com/cgi-bin/read...ory=1155076891
Less expensive Vuelta rings go up to 60 teeth in either bolt pattern:
https://hostelshoppe.com/cgi-bin/read...ory=1016049820
https://hostelshoppe.com/cgi-bin/read...sory=990633343

IMO, no particular advantage to either setup.
__________________
Jeff Wills

Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-08 | 09:14 AM
  #9  
JanMM's Avatar
rebmeM roineS
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,231
Likes: 366
From: Metro Indy, IN

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer

Smallest middle ring on a 130 triple is 38.
JanMM is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-08 | 11:36 AM
  #10  
DannoXYZ's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,754
Likes: 26
From: Mesa, AZ

Bikes: Moots RCS, tandem, beach-cruiser, MTB, Specialized-Allez road-bike, custom track-bike

Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
On the largest sized rings, there would be less "ring flex" with the 130's vs 110's.
Only laterally. Forces in the plane of the rings wouldn't flex a 110bcd ring any more than a 130mm one. You've got some problems on your bike if you're loading the rings laterally.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-08 | 03:59 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,245
Likes: 3
From: Auld Blighty

Bikes: Early Cannondale tandem, '99 S&S Frezoni Audax, '65 Moulton Stowaway, '52 Claud Butler, TSR30, Brompton

Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
You've got some problems on your bike if you're loading the rings laterally.
Heard of cross-chaining? It is possible to fold lightweight chainrings.
LWaB is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-08 | 04:17 PM
  #12  
joejack951's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,103
Likes: 96
From: Wilmington, DE

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Originally Posted by BigAlMN
Can someone help me out? I would like to know what the benefits / disadvantages are for the 110 and 130 chainrings.

I ride a recumbent and I suppose one of the reasons for the 110BCD original equipment is to allow for a very small granny ring. I comes with a 24T ring. Seems that the smallest I can get in the 130BCD is a 30T. Is that the limits of the rationale? or is there something more to be considered.
74mm BCD chainrings seems to go down as low as 24 teeth: https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...&category=3161

Standard road triples (usually 74/130 BCD) generally come with a 30 tooth inner ring whereas touring/hybrid triples (usually 74/110 BCD) will come with a 26 or 28 tooth inner chainring. There is nothing keeping you from using a 24 tooth inner ring on a road triple other than possible sloppy shifting into the middle ring given that the smallest you could fit on the 130mm BCD is 38 teeth. In order to stay within your front deraillers shifting capacity, you'd then also need to drop the size of the big ring down.
joejack951 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-06-08 | 08:08 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
The 130 rings, middle and outer, take a ring range from 38 to 65 tooth. The 110 rings, middle and outer, take a ring range from 33 to 54 tooth. The small 74 BCD rings, on both standard road and road touring triples, take a ring range from 24 to 36 tooth. The 110/74 BCD was common on many early mountain bikes, but is now generally referred to as standard road touring BCD. Mountain bikes went to even smaller granny ring BCD, with a 22 tooth small ring being the most common.

For the 110/74 road touring cranksets, like Sugino, a 26-36-46 chainring setup is common.

Last edited by Skewer; 07-06-08 at 05:17 PM.
Skewer is offline  
Reply
Old 07-06-08 | 12:55 PM
  #14  
DannoXYZ's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 11,754
Likes: 26
From: Mesa, AZ

Bikes: Moots RCS, tandem, beach-cruiser, MTB, Specialized-Allez road-bike, custom track-bike

Originally Posted by LWaB
Heard of cross-chaining? It is possible to fold lightweight chainrings.
And cross-chaining isn't a problem?
DannoXYZ is offline  
Reply
Old 07-07-08 | 09:33 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,245
Likes: 3
From: Auld Blighty

Bikes: Early Cannondale tandem, '99 S&S Frezoni Audax, '65 Moulton Stowaway, '52 Claud Butler, TSR30, Brompton

Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
Only laterally. Forces in the plane of the rings wouldn't flex a 110bcd ring any more than a 130mm one. You've got some problems on your bike if you're loading the rings laterally.
Cross-chaining loads the rings laterally and most people seem to do it to some extent.
LWaB is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-08 | 02:06 AM
  #16  
Torchy McFlux's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver

Bikes: NOYB

Originally Posted by LWaB
Heard of cross-chaining? It is possible to fold lightweight chainrings.
Never seen it happen. Not once.
Torchy McFlux is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-08 | 07:59 AM
  #17  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,194
Likes: 6,279
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by Torchy McFlux
Never seen it happen. Not once.
Folded a 53 tooth chainring on a tandem in half when I shifted into too low a gear with a short chain. Others have posted about folding rings. It happens. Not often, but it happens.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply
Old 07-08-08 | 08:08 AM
  #18  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,194
Likes: 6,279
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by joejack951
74mm BCD chainrings seems to go down as low as 24 teeth: https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...&category=3161

Standard road triples (usually 74/130 BCD) generally come with a 30 tooth inner ring whereas touring/hybrid triples (usually 74/110 BCD) will come with a 26 or 28 tooth inner chainring. There is nothing keeping you from using a 24 tooth inner ring on a road triple other than possible sloppy shifting into the middle ring given that the smallest you could fit on the 130mm BCD is 38 teeth. In order to stay within your front deraillers shifting capacity, you'd then also need to drop the size of the big ring down.
While you can use a 24 inner ring on a 130/74 crank, the longer arms of the 130 spider can allow the chain to get trapped between the arm and the inner ring on occasion. It's not common but it can happen. Getting the chain out from behind the inner ring is difficult. On a 110/74, the spider is shorter and there's no room for the chain to rest in between the inner ring and the arms.

I have a 48/34/22 mountain bike crank with an 11-34 on my bikes. Plenty of high end and low end.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply
Old 07-09-08 | 05:29 PM
  #19  
joejack951's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,103
Likes: 96
From: Wilmington, DE

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Originally Posted by cyccommute
While you can use a 24 inner ring on a 130/74 crank, the longer arms of the 130 spider can allow the chain to get trapped between the arm and the inner ring on occasion. It's not common but it can happen. Getting the chain out from behind the inner ring is difficult. On a 110/74, the spider is shorter and there's no room for the chain to rest in between the inner ring and the arms.

I have a 48/34/22 mountain bike crank with an 11-34 on my bikes. Plenty of high end and low end.
Thanks for chiming in with the real world experience about a 24 tooth ring on a 130/74 crank. Out of curiosity, have you tried a 26 on the same setup and how did it work?
joejack951 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-10-08 | 08:38 AM
  #20  
cyccommute's Avatar
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,194
Likes: 6,279
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by joejack951
Thanks for chiming in with the real world experience about a 24 tooth ring on a 130/74 crank. Out of curiosity, have you tried a 26 on the same setup and how did it work?
It's been a while, but I think it came with a 28 or 26. That was never a problem and the issue with the 24 was a rarity. Just be aware that it can happen and it's a bugger to get the chain back out. I have changed the crank since then because I wanted a lower middle gear.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.