Mavic Open Pro wheelbuilding problem
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,047
Bikes: Panasonic NJS Keirin x2, Level Professional, Bianchi CUSS, GT Pulse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Mavic Open Pro wheelbuilding problem
Hey all,
I decided to go with Open Pros on WI hubs for a fixed gear build.
I used 605 for the ERD on the hoops and used 292mm length DT spokes (calculated using Bike Institute's calc) for the front wheel.
I'm lacing the front 3x, 32h. Hub is C to F 33mm and 65mm FD.
For some reason, after I finish the right side, the left side leading spokes are wanting to come off the flange at an extreme angle, so much so that it nearly crosses over the head of the trailing spoke, and are clearly too short.
This is the second time I've torn down and rebuilt, yet I'm still having trouble. Any suggestions?
I decided to go with Open Pros on WI hubs for a fixed gear build.
I used 605 for the ERD on the hoops and used 292mm length DT spokes (calculated using Bike Institute's calc) for the front wheel.
I'm lacing the front 3x, 32h. Hub is C to F 33mm and 65mm FD.
For some reason, after I finish the right side, the left side leading spokes are wanting to come off the flange at an extreme angle, so much so that it nearly crosses over the head of the trailing spoke, and are clearly too short.
This is the second time I've torn down and rebuilt, yet I'm still having trouble. Any suggestions?
#2
afraid of whales
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Sounds like the spokes are set in the hub incorrectly. I'd pull all the spokes from the left side and move them over one spoke hole, then try to lace the wheel again.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,047
Bikes: Panasonic NJS Keirin x2, Level Professional, Bianchi CUSS, GT Pulse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'll give this a shot; I had to relace the first time because the key spoke is the second hole over from the valve hole on the Open Pro, therefore the trailing spokes need to come to the one empty hole between the valve hole and the key spoke, but when I lace this way, I run into the aforementioned problem.
I'll just pull it all apart and try again I guess.
I'll just pull it all apart and try again I guess.
#4
afraid of whales
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
This is what makes me think you're off by one hole. I assume the right side has the spokes all even, both sides of the right side hub flange's spokes are symeterical.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
ERD of 605mm?
Whoah...
Usually it is 602mm min. / 603mm max.
I get 291mm for your specs...292mm should work - will hit top of nipples though but still work.
=8-)
Whoah...
Usually it is 602mm min. / 603mm max.
I get 291mm for your specs...292mm should work - will hit top of nipples though but still work.
=8-)
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,047
Bikes: Panasonic NJS Keirin x2, Level Professional, Bianchi CUSS, GT Pulse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I went w 605 bc it was my understanding that Mavic quotes spoke bed diameter as opposed to ERD, so I added 3mm to the advertised 602 ERD.
The first time I laced the wheel I was able to get all the way around 3x, but my valve hole ended up being in between two crossing spokes, so I tore down and redid it, only to run into the issue I'm having now. I probably am off a hole on the hub, but I just wanted some suggestions before I spent more time tearing down and rebuilding.
The first time I laced the wheel I was able to get all the way around 3x, but my valve hole ended up being in between two crossing spokes, so I tore down and redid it, only to run into the issue I'm having now. I probably am off a hole on the hub, but I just wanted some suggestions before I spent more time tearing down and rebuilding.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
I would also like to see
huh? where did all my text go?
I don't feel like re-writing it (or re-membering it) now that this thread has devolved into an Open Pro ERD thread.
huh? where did all my text go?
I don't feel like re-writing it (or re-membering it) now that this thread has devolved into an Open Pro ERD thread.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
Last edited by TallRider; 12-03-09 at 10:23 AM. Reason: what I wrote disappeared, and I didn't do it
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
Building my 1/2 dozenth Open Pro right now folks on a Phil Wood Single Single-Sided Track Rear...602mm it is...that'll result in the spokes finishing at or a hair above the screwdriver flat.
Trust me...605mm is pushing it...you are running the risk of running out of threads before reaching proper tension.
=8-)
Trust me...605mm is pushing it...you are running the risk of running out of threads before reaching proper tension.
=8-)
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
Building my 1/2 dozenth Open Pro right now folks on a Phil Wood Single Single-Sided Track Rear...602mm it is...that'll result in the spokes finishing at or a hair above the screwdriver flat.
Trust me...605mm is pushing it...you are running the risk of running out of threads before reaching proper tension.
=8-)
Trust me...605mm is pushing it...you are running the risk of running out of threads before reaching proper tension.
=8-)
Al
#12
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
32h Open Pro = 602-603
36h Open Pro = 602-603
Once again reaffirming the fact that you should just measure everything yourself.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
Someday I'm going to suffer Canadian and Oklahoman sales taxes just to share a soda with operator and Al1943 cause we seem to often be within a mm of each other on ERDs.
On rare occasions...an Open Pro will come in at 601mm...and sometimes 603mm. 602mm is my working average and usually what I get and stick with.
Anyone using 605mm and 606mm is asking for trouble cause if that nipple doesn't allow a couple threads past the top of the nipple - you are faciing a high risk of disassembly and substitution for shorter spokes.
=8-)
On rare occasions...an Open Pro will come in at 601mm...and sometimes 603mm. 602mm is my working average and usually what I get and stick with.
Anyone using 605mm and 606mm is asking for trouble cause if that nipple doesn't allow a couple threads past the top of the nipple - you are faciing a high risk of disassembly and substitution for shorter spokes.
=8-)
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
If you guys don't mind...I'll be happy to post my binder of ERDs for lotsa different rims...so you guys can print 'em out. I keep my calc papers when I can and rejot into my binder when not too busy. Reduces re-measuring which happens all too often out on the road.
=8-)
=8-)
#15
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
That's the kinda thing ought to be in a sticky thread.
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#16
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Seems like it at first glance.
I guess we could give a range for ERD so people can do a quick sanity check. But as for using a number gleaned off the interwebz for erd...naw. I'm still going to measure most rims I build (we don't build too many wheels in a work month so getting doing the extra step isn't inefficient in terms of shop time. If this sticky were to happen i'd like to have a very large disclaimer at the bottom telling people to measure the ACTUAL rim they're using or gamble on the ERD matching the rim they're holding.
Also one other offtopic thing is that i'd love someone to make a digital ERD stick. Similar to a digital caliper but for quickly measuring ERd'S. The current $70MSRP sticks (seriously? sticks?) are ****ing annoying to use and it's not totally accurate either.
I guess we could give a range for ERD so people can do a quick sanity check. But as for using a number gleaned off the interwebz for erd...naw. I'm still going to measure most rims I build (we don't build too many wheels in a work month so getting doing the extra step isn't inefficient in terms of shop time. If this sticky were to happen i'd like to have a very large disclaimer at the bottom telling people to measure the ACTUAL rim they're using or gamble on the ERD matching the rim they're holding.
Also one other offtopic thing is that i'd love someone to make a digital ERD stick. Similar to a digital caliper but for quickly measuring ERd'S. The current $70MSRP sticks (seriously? sticks?) are ****ing annoying to use and it's not totally accurate either.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I just took a look at the DT Swiss spoke length calculator, what I usually use. The help menu says that their ERD is measured at the nipple seats. And for Open Pro rims they use 605.
Not saying who's right or wrong.
Al
Not saying who's right or wrong.
Al
#18
A little North of Hell
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
erd
make your own rim rods.
or
Sutherlands ERD tool: https://www.sutherlandsbicycle.com/rimdiametersystem/
or
bike-alog rimometer
#19
afraid of whales
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I use 602 for the 319, if you use 602 for the Open Pros you'll be too short. Wheel will look good, if that's what you're looking for...BTW, Mavic makes all those rims and publishes the dimensions, "unrelated" isn't really the correct word to use.
#20
nice idea, poor execution
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West Newton, MA
Posts: 395
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If this is completely off the mark, I apologize, but it seems like the only reasonable explanation for everyone else using 602, and you (and DT) using 605. We build wheels to the bottom of the slot here at the shop.
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,047
Bikes: Panasonic NJS Keirin x2, Level Professional, Bianchi CUSS, GT Pulse
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I tore down the wheel and relaced, and Mr. IGH was right, I was off on the left flange by a hole. Amateur.
Anyway, 605 ERD works, if not a tad long; the spokes poke up just slightly past the nipples when tensioned. I would say the best working ERD for Mavic OPs, a common ground, would be 603.
Anyway, 605 ERD works, if not a tad long; the spokes poke up just slightly past the nipples when tensioned. I would say the best working ERD for Mavic OPs, a common ground, would be 603.
#22
afraid of whales
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Front Range, CO
Posts: 4,306
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I tore down the wheel and relaced, and Mr. IGH was right, I was off on the left flange by a hole.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 3,504
Bikes: 2001 Tommasini Sintesi w/ Campagnolo Daytona 10 Speed
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 145 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 35 Times
in
30 Posts
r=66.0
c_opp=44.0
c_drive=29.0
Mavic Open Pro 700c Double Eyelet
R=602.0mm
SL_opp = 292.00
SL_drive=290.50
Both sides run thru a Phil Wood Spoke machine - yes - I'll cut .5 mm increments.
Wheel is done with drive side carefully tensioned to 107-115 and dished. Result is such that the ends of the spokes both drive and opp side have finished exactly at the screwdriver flat.
Mind explaining how 602mm is too short? Just curious?
=8-)