Shimano bottom brackets symmetrical?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Slower Lower Delaware
Posts: 116
Bikes: 1995 Torelli Corsa Strada 2021 State 4130
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Shimano bottom brackets symmetrical?
I spent an hour or so in the archives but wasn't able to find a straight answer. I also checked the Shimano website. Are Shimano square taper sealed bottom brackets symmetrical?(specifically UN54) Example: To move my chainline in 4mm I'd have to go from a 115mm to a 107mm. Thanks.
#3
nice idea, poor execution
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West Newton, MA
Posts: 395
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just measured most of the bottom brackets on hand here at the store:
https://blog.harriscyclery.com/relati...ttom-brackets/
Some of them aren't actually symmetrical, but your assumption re: 115mm vs. 107mm is correct.
https://blog.harriscyclery.com/relati...ttom-brackets/
Some of them aren't actually symmetrical, but your assumption re: 115mm vs. 107mm is correct.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
I'd started some threads and gotten a bunch of measurements on Shimano square-taper BB's awhile back, but don't remember what was what. You can search for threads started by me, with "bottom bracket" in the thread title.
I do remember that 107 is symmetrical and 110 isn't (having 3mm longer non-drive-side extension) as operator notes.
I do remember that 107 is symmetrical and 110 isn't (having 3mm longer non-drive-side extension) as operator notes.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Miele Man
Bicycle Mechanics
14
12-30-15 08:29 AM