Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Suntour ARX Capacity

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Suntour ARX Capacity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-10 | 11:09 AM
  #1  
jsgipson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Show-Me-State
Suntour ARX Capacity

I have done a lot of research, but keep finding conflicting info. Sheldon Brown says that nearly all RDs can handle a 14-28 6 speed freewheel. I have also seen that the max cog capacity for an ARX is 26, with a total capacity of 28. What is difference between max and total? I want to verify that a Suntour ARX can handle this range. I have got a 52/42 double up front. Any info would be appreciated.
jsgipson is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-10 | 11:48 AM
  #2  
well biked's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 229
Originally Posted by jsgipson
What is difference between max and total?
The max is the largest cog compatibility. This has to do with the "geometry" of the derailleur's body. The idea is that you don't want the upper pulley bumping into the largest cog. It's impossible to say exactly what will work with a certain derailleur because there are other variables involved such as the derailleur hanger's exact position relative to the rear axle. I would expect your ARX to be able to handle a 28t cog.

The total capacity is the chain wrap capacity, which is how much chain the derailleur can "wrap" without the chain going slack. The formula for figuring chain wrap requirement for a given drivetrain is largest chainring minus smallest chainring plus largest cog minus smallest cog equals the total chainwrap requirement. I would expect your ARX derailleur to work with your proposed drivetrain in this regard as well.
well biked is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-10 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
jsgipson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Show-Me-State
Good advice. Thanks for the info.
jsgipson is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-10 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
wrk101's Avatar
Thrifty Bill
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,645
Likes: 1,109
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

An ARX GT will handle more wrap as the GT models are long cage.

The ARX is a good, midgrade model from Suntour. I have ARX on my Lotus.
wrk101 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-10 | 01:53 PM
  #5  
jsgipson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Show-Me-State
A GT would be better, but I have a minty standard ARX that I am anxious to try. Sounds like it should work.
jsgipson is offline  
Reply
Old 02-07-10 | 09:32 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

My '85 Bridgestone 400 came OEM with the ARX-GT rear deraileur, a 14x32 6-speed freewheel and an SR crank with 52/42 chainrings and tapped for a granny ring which I added. It worked fine so I expect a 28T cog will be no problem at all.

Generally, the long cage versions of a rear derailleur will clear the same maximum rear cog but just won't "wrap" as much chain. So the ARX-GT handled the wide range freewheel and the triple crank but the non-GT would have problems with that many "total teeth"even if it cleared the same large cog.
HillRider is offline  
Reply
Old 02-07-10 | 10:08 PM
  #7  
wrk101's Avatar
Thrifty Bill
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,645
Likes: 1,109
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert

Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more

Originally Posted by jsgipson
A GT would be better, but I have a minty standard ARX that I am anxious to try. Sounds like it should work.
I always like to try what I have in hand first.
wrk101 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-10 | 08:40 PM
  #8  
mikeinroch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, NY

Bikes: 1982 Team Fuji, 1992 Nishiki Backroads, 1999 Diamondback Topanga SE

I've got a Suntour aRX (short cage) on my '81 Fuji Team with a 14-28 six speed freewheel and a 53/42 chainrings. Works great.

Last edited by mikeinroch; 02-11-10 at 08:44 PM.
mikeinroch is offline  
Reply
Old 02-11-10 | 09:14 PM
  #9  
jsgipson's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Show-Me-State
Originally Posted by mikeinroch
I've got a Suntour aRX (short cage) on my '81 Fuji Team with a 14-28 six speed freewheel and a 53/42 chainrings. Works great.
Thanks for the reply. Good to hear that you are running that setup without any issues.
jsgipson is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwa
Classic & Vintage
29
10-16-24 09:21 PM
Phil_gretz
Classic & Vintage
18
07-22-12 09:49 PM
jonwvara
Classic & Vintage
3
05-23-12 05:15 AM
jonwvara
Classic & Vintage
6
11-19-11 12:51 PM
Binxsy
Bicycle Mechanics
4
12-10-09 08:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.