Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Old Schoole Wheelset

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Old Schoole Wheelset

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-10 | 08:10 AM
  #1  
jprestley@comca's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Old Schoole Wheelset

So I'm building a retro sort of wheelset with 36-spoke silver Campy hubs and Ambrosio aluminum box rims. Thinking 2.0/1.5/2.0 spokes will be OK for my 175 lbs. but my questions are 1) 3-cross or 4-cross lacing? and 2) 2/1.8/2 spokes for the rear drive side?
jprestley@comca is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-10 | 08:27 AM
  #2  
Retro Grouch's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 30,225
Likes: 649
From: St Peters, Missouri

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

1. Three or four cross is really a function of hub flange diameter. Sometimes the spokes cross at the spoke holes on the flanges and make it hard to lace. Practically, I only use 4 cross for 40 spoke wheels.

2. If I were building the wheels, especially a "retro sort", I'd use 2/1.8/2 for everything. I don't see that you're gaining anything by using the skinnier spokes.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-10 | 08:43 AM
  #3  
canopus's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 174
From: Kingwood, TX

Bikes: Road, Touring, BMX, Cruisers...

I use straight 1.8 on my front wheels and straight 2.0 on the rear (sometime DB on the non-drive side) and I weigh 205 or so.

3 cross is fine.
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
canopus is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-10 | 09:36 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

3 or 4 cross is of marginal significance on small flange hubs and only slightly less marginal on LF hubs, but I always built my LF 36h wheels 4x. 4x will not cause any issues on any hub of 36h or more regardless of flange size, so that's your choice.

Your choice of spokes is virtually identical to what I've used for years, going with the heavier 2.0/1.8 butted on the right rear flange to mitigate the effects of dish somewhat.

You have it dialed in perfectly, so toss a coin about the number of crosses and go to it.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-10 | 10:22 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast

Bikes: 8

the 4th cross is spoke A , crossing spoke , B , then going to the rim opposite to the side of the 1st crossing spoke..

Happened to build a Campag Hi Low Hub , and laced it to exaggerate the spoke length difference.

High Right side 3X, the low flange side 4 cross on the left.. its been fine for 25+ years.. plain 1.8mm (15 gage) un butted.

FWIW, racers when they are doing the cobbles in the race to Roubaix , they pull out the 3 cross box section Tubular rim wheels. unless their sponsor pays the team to use the carbon stuff ..

So, 3 cross is a little shorter spoke than 4, the distance to the right flange of a dished wheel uses a shorter spoke than
to the left flange.. mixed crosses are OK
In fact people have used the fact that 36 is evenly dividable by both 3 and 4,

to lace wheels in a group of 3 , a radial spoke and 2 tangential spokes [2x?] in a group rather than a group of 4..

Yea toss a coin , several , you can build 3 x drive and 2 cross the left side and so forth ...
fietsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-10 | 11:09 AM
  #6  
canopus's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 174
From: Kingwood, TX

Bikes: Road, Touring, BMX, Cruisers...

My first pair of 700c's I built using 4x cross drive side, 3x non drive side. Still true and ridable.

All my BMX wheels I built using 4x with all the spokes radiating to the outside of the hub. We used to call it Race-Lace and it built a nice set of wheels based on 36 spokes, but man calculating the spoke lengths was a pain and more than once I had to recut them after lacing with the Phil machine which I dearly miss being able to use)
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
canopus is offline  
Reply
Old 08-24-10 | 07:36 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,660
Likes: 177
3X and I would use 18-16 double butted spokes all around.
davidad is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ThermionicScott
Classic & Vintage
19
09-15-15 07:29 PM
guitarplayerone
Bicycle Mechanics
4
06-22-15 12:25 PM
Reynolds
Bicycle Mechanics
21
02-08-15 01:28 PM
nybiker
Bicycle Mechanics
16
03-16-14 12:44 PM
rbautch
Road Cycling
14
11-25-10 09:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.