Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Crank Compatibility Question

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Crank Compatibility Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-10 | 02:37 PM
  #1  
APER, Man!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Sonoma County, CA
Crank Compatibility Question

Hello!

I have an 80s steel frame Specialized Allez. It's a 12-speed, and I'm hoping to replace the double cranks on the front with a triple crankset. However, I don't know much about bikes, and I'm not sure how to find out which ones are compatible with my bottom bracket. I've attached a picture, but I'm not sure if it'll help. Also, I'd like more than just the answer of which crankset will be compatible. I want to figure out how to determine that.

Here is the info from the triple crankset I was looking at:
Square taper bottom bracket spindles
172.5mm crank arms
130mm BCD
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
double_cranks..jpg (102.0 KB, 5 views)
APER, Man! is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-10 | 02:45 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast

Bikes: 8

Get a package of a crankset and a BB .. length of BB is influenced by the design of the crank .
Low Profile = short axle , because of the design of the arm other designs use a longer axle but have the arm
at 90 degrees from the axle , and actually have the pedals further in towards the centerline.. "Q"
fietsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-10 | 02:46 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 578
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

BB shells have not changed for a very long time. Yours has the standard English thread - 68mm width by 1.375 inch. The left side has left hand threads.

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/cribshee...mbrackets.html

You can use just about any triple crank you can find, that uses a threaded BB.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-10 | 02:53 PM
  #4  
velo-orange
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A triple crank will most often require you to change the rear derailleur to a long cage, get a longer chain, a wider Bottom bracket spindle and a triple compatible front deraileur. if you have downtube shifters instead of STI levers they *should* be able to shift the new front derailleur through all 3 rings.

An alternative is a compact double with an overall lower range of gearing than a traditional racing double. I'm assuming you want to have a lower range of gears. what about your upper range? Are you really spinning out the 53x11 or 12t? How often are you actually in the 53? You can still retain the existing chain and derailleurs in most cases.

A compact double (110 bolt pattern, 48 or 50t outer ring, 34 or 36t inner ring) should give you a reasonable gear range. It will not be as high as a racing dbl, and not as low low as a triple.
 
Reply
Old 09-12-10 | 03:33 PM
  #5  
APER, Man!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Sonoma County, CA
Thanks, everyone. Now I know what I can/can't get, but I'm still unsure as to how you knew. I'm guessing most bikes are the English thread? I have another old road bike I was going to ask about.

Velo-orange, I'm in the 53 quite often. There are some good hills around here with 10% grades. On the way up, it's super hard work. The way down, not so much, but when I do pedal, I'm in the biggest gear ratio.
APER, Man! is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-10 | 04:28 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 578
From: Loveland, CO

Bikes: Cervelo Rouvida x 2

We know because the vast majority of frames use English BB threads, except for Italian frames and Eddy Merckx frames for many years.

All you really need to do is measure the BB shell width. If it's 68mm, then it's English. Italian shells are 70mm wide.
DaveSSS is offline  
Reply
Old 09-12-10 | 04:38 PM
  #7  
storckm's Avatar
Cyclist
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 683
Likes: 49
I wouldn't think you'd need a longer chain, unless your triple has larger gears than the double--unlikely, or if you replace the rear derailleur with a longer cage one. You might need a longer or shorter bottom bracket spindle, depending on what cranks you get. Similarly, you might or might not need to replace the derailleurs. Some front derailleurs sold for doubles work fine for triples, in my experience, but I'm sure there are some that wouldn't. Whether or not you need to replace the rear derailleur depends more on the difference between your the number of teeth in your highest and lowest gear. Sometimes, you can get away with not replacing the rear derailleur even though you can't shift into the smallest chainring and the smallest cog at the same time. This is usually O.K., at least for people like me who only use the smallest chainring with the largest three cogs.
storckm is offline  
Reply
Old 09-13-10 | 12:56 AM
  #8  
APER, Man!'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Sonoma County, CA
Originally Posted by DaveSSS
We know because the vast majority of frames use English BB threads, except for Italian frames and Eddy Merckx frames for many years.

All you really need to do is measure the BB shell width. If it's 68mm, then it's English. Italian shells are 70mm wide.
Thanks, Dave. I like your name, by the way. (I have the same one).


Originally Posted by storckm
I wouldn't think you'd need a longer chain, unless your triple has larger gears than the double--unlikely, or if you replace the rear derailleur with a longer cage one. You might need a longer or shorter bottom bracket spindle, depending on what cranks you get. Similarly, you might or might not need to replace the derailleurs. Some front derailleurs sold for doubles work fine for triples, in my experience, but I'm sure there are some that wouldn't. Whether or not you need to replace the rear derailleur depends more on the difference between your the number of teeth in your highest and lowest gear. Sometimes, you can get away with not replacing the rear derailleur even though you can't shift into the smallest chainring and the smallest cog at the same time. This is usually O.K., at least for people like me who only use the smallest chainring with the largest three cogs.
That sounds pretty good. Thank you for the help.
APER, Man! is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.