Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Is an clamp on road derailleur inferior or superior to a braze on version + adapter?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Is an clamp on road derailleur inferior or superior to a braze on version + adapter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-10, 10:14 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Is an clamp on road derailleur inferior or superior to a braze on version + adapter?

Is an clamp on road derailleur inferior or superior to a braze on version in conjunction with braze-on clamp adapter (in a road bike who does not have a braze on holder in the first place)?
Feedback appreciated
saturnhr is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 10:43 AM
  #2  
Guest
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Grid Reference, SK
Posts: 3,768

Bikes: I never learned to ride a bike. It is my deepest shame.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Properly set up, there should be no functional difference. During set-up, however, the adapter will give you one more variable that could possibly go wrong, although in my experience you'd have to screw up pretty bad to get it wrong.

Otherwise, the clamp-on derailleur might be slightly lighter than a braze-on-derailleur + adapter, but nobody in the world could actually notice the difference.
LarDasse74 is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 10:46 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
I don't think you'd ever notice the difference. Personally, I wish the component manufacturers would just make every FD braze-on and include a clamp.
caloso is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 11:21 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What is about the argument to be able to twist the derailleur setup (with a little shim) on the two piece (derailleur plus adapter) setup to adapt the curvature of the front derailleur better to smaller chainrings (46 or 48) in cyclocross. On the contrary, I don't like to have this two piece setup in cyclocross!
The other thing I came acrross is the ability to attach those new design chain catchers which I think are superior to older style chain catchers - those also require a two piece setup unless you want to accept two clamps next to eachother?
https://www.acecosportgroup.com/shop/...n-catcher.html

Last edited by saturnhr; 09-14-10 at 12:10 PM. Reason: typos
saturnhr is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 11:33 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Once the frame design goes wild as Many Carbon frames are no longer round tube, You got no choice,
and don't even think about a chainring size change more than a tooth or 2.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 12:17 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times in 1,417 Posts
Originally Posted by saturnhr
What is about the argument to be able to twist the derailleur setup (with a little shim) on the two piece (derailleur plus adapter) setup to adapt the curvature of the front derailleur better to smaller chainrings (46 or 48) in cyclocross. On the contrary, I don't like to have this two piece setup in cyclocross!
The other thing I came acrross is the ability to attach those new design chain catchers which I think are superior to older style chain catchers - those also require a two piece setup unless you want to accept two clamps next to eachother?
https://www.acecosportgroup.com/shop/...n-catcher.html
I have one like this on my CX bike. It just uses a hose clamp to attach it to the seat tube under the FD. It set up very easily and I don't even notice it.

caloso is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 01:01 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
I have one like this on my CX bike. It just uses a hose clamp to attach it to the seat tube under the FD. It set up very easily and I don't even notice it.

I have used this type before. However, it doesn't work on many carbon frames which loose roundness in their lower seattube part. That is very the beauty and usefuslness of the new chaincatcher (mentioned in my post above) comes in (and were the brace-on adapter screw is needed).

Last edited by saturnhr; 09-14-10 at 01:04 PM.
saturnhr is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 03:59 PM
  #8  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,790

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3589 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times in 1,934 Posts
The advantage of braze-on/glue-on/rivet-on derailleur mounts is that they can be fitted to non-round tubes. The disadvantage is that they may restrict the range of chainring sizes you can use.

Clamp-on front derailleurs are more versatile in that they can be positioned where you need them, but they only work on round tubes.

If you have a round seat tube there's no compelling reason to use a braze-on/glue-on/rivet-on derailleur mount.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 07:12 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
My preference is for a braze-on type front derailleur plus the proper adapter clamp for three reasons:

1. Braze-on front derailleurs are less expensive than built-in clamp types and the adapter is a one time purchase.

2. When you strip the bike down for an overhaul you can leave the adapter in place and the fd reinstalls aligned just like it was before you removed it.

3. Not all models of clamp-on front derailleurs come in all clamp diameters but they all come in a braze-on model.

As noted, these only work on round seat tube bikes, which all of mine happen to be.
HillRider is offline  
Old 09-14-10, 08:10 PM
  #10  
30 YR Wrench
 
BikeWise1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oxford, OH
Posts: 2,006

Bikes: Waterford R-33, Madone 6.5, Trek 520

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
The biggest problem with braze-on derailleurs is that front derailleur performance is at the mercy of the bracket. I've seen flimsy brackets on very, very high end carbon bikes that allowed so much flex that a clean shift was all but impossible. Clamp on allows the derailleur to function more accurately.
BikeWise1 is offline  
Old 09-15-10, 09:51 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times in 364 Posts
Sometimes they're the same.

Somewhere around here I've got an Ultegra equipped bike which came from the factory with the front derailleur bolted onto a separate seat tube bracket. I've owned and ridden that bike for over 10 years and have never felt the need to change it.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 09-15-10, 12:00 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
I prefer the braze-on FD + clamp combo more because over time with FD adjustments, it damages the seat-tube less. Every time I have to slide a one-piece FD up and down or rotate it to fine-tune, it leaves a little clamp mark on the paint. This was especially apparent on one bike where I had fitted different front-chainrings for road-race versus TT use; after a couple of swaps, there was annoying marks above and below the clamp. With a 2-piece design, I place the clamp in the middle of the range I would move the FD. Then I just unbolt the FD and slide it up and down the clamp as needed without disturbing the frame. This is more distressing on a CF frame.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
morri869
Classic & Vintage
19
05-09-19 10:50 AM
azza_333
Touring
0
07-07-16 06:18 PM
BadKarma62
Bicycle Mechanics
3
07-07-12 05:03 AM
vyper76
Bicycle Mechanics
1
06-27-11 03:34 PM
Barrettscv
Bicycle Mechanics
6
05-22-11 08:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.