Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Fork replacement

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Fork replacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-10 | 12:45 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Vancity
Fork replacement

Hi,
I'm considering an upgrade of my kona paddywagon to front disc brake. In order to do so, I'll need to replace my stock Kona Retro Road fork to something like THIS
My main concern is that stock fork has 380mm axle to crown when cyclocross one is 398. Would it change my frame geometry significantly? Also, any critique of the project idea or other ways to implement it would be appreciated.
Thanks,
-Igor.
dikman is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-10 | 12:51 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,687
Likes: 297
Originally Posted by dikman
I'm considering an upgrade of my kona paddywagon to front disc brake...My main concern is that stock fork has 380mm axle to crown when cyclocross one is 398. Would it change my frame geometry significantly?
Well, significantly means different things to different people. I would probably notice the change - but not be troubled by it. But I'm sure that other people would swear blind that a 20 mm diff in axle-to-crown would cause so much of a change to make the bike virtually unrideable.

Oh, there's rake too to consider.
dabac is offline  
Reply
Old 11-02-10 | 01:12 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Vancity
Originally Posted by dabac
Oh, there's rake too to consider.
Yes, you are right. The problem is I can't find the rake data for kona fork on internet. Nashbar one is 45mm.
Edited:
Actually, I've find additional data for kona here:
Fork Length: 375mm
Fork offset (I'm assuming that is the rake): 43mm

So, how bad is it comparing to nashbar 380mm and 45mm?
Thanks,
-Igor.

Last edited by dikman; 11-02-10 at 01:30 PM.
dikman is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-10 | 04:36 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,687
Likes: 297
Originally Posted by dikman
..Actually, I've find additional data for kona ...
Fork Length: 375mm
Fork offset (I'm assuming that is the rake): 43mm

So, how bad is it comparing to nashbar 380mm and 45mm?
I don't think anyone would be able to tell those forks apart in a blind test. For the axle-to-crown it's in the ballpark of running a wider tire at the front, and for the rake - forget about it.
dabac is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-10 | 06:56 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,579
Likes: 6
From: Pearland, Texas

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Igor, With a full set of instruments you'd see a difference, seat of the pants difference will be nil.

Brad
bradtx is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elaine
Road Cycling
7
11-12-17 09:19 PM
agressor
Mountain Biking
1
08-28-14 11:24 AM
MXBoy11
Mountain Biking
10
10-09-11 07:27 AM
dikman
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
8
11-02-10 11:27 PM
Lightingguy
Bicycle Mechanics
2
09-26-10 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.