Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Much difference in weight between deraileurs?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Much difference in weight between deraileurs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-11 | 06:30 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Much difference in weight between deraileurs?

I bought a Shimano Deore front deraileur off Ebay and when it arrived I was surprised at how much the little thing weighs. I don't handle parts enough to really make any weight comparisons. Are there any mechanics in the house that can tell me--- is there much difference in weight between the different brands and qualities of front deraileurs?

Thanks,
Bob
wheels78 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 06:52 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 4
"is there much difference in weight between the different brands and qualities of front derailleurs?"

yes
ultraman6970 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 07:57 PM
  #3  
BCRider's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,559
Likes: 53
From: The 'Wack, BC, Canada

Bikes: Norco (2), Miyata, Canondale, Soma, Redline

But it's clearly not enough in the grand scheme of things to matter. Look up the difference in the weight between a Deore and XTR derailleurs and then reduce the water in your hydration bladder by the same amount. You won't even notice the difference in bladder inflation status. And if you typically finish your rides with water in the bladder then just fill it a bit less and you'll hae your XTR like weight advantage.
BCRider is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 09:40 PM
  #4  
Burton's Avatar
Certified Bike Brat
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,251
Likes: 6
From: Montreal, Quebec
Yes and no. Maybe its worth describing some things that influence weight.
They all have one thing in common - the need to physically push a steel chain to one side or another. That requirement pretty much eliminates anything except steel as a cage material simply due to wear characteristics of the metal. However, the direct mount front derailleurs will weigh less than the models than clamp to a frame, and models with steel clamps will weigh more than models with alloy clamps.
Any derailleur designed to handle narrow chains will have a narrower cage and therefore be marginally lighter.
Suggest yo try a few different models if your friends have them on their bikes. There is a slight difference in the effort needed to shift between some models and that may be more interesting than any weight differences.
Burton is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 09:52 PM
  #5  
mechBgon's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 6
They all have one thing in common - the need to physically push a steel chain to one side or another. That requirement pretty much eliminates anything except steel as a cage material simply due to wear characteristics of the metal.
For the record, XTR front derailleurs have used aluminum cages in all the low-clamp models since the 950 series, with the sole exception of the 985 variant that's built for 2-ring XTR Race cranksets. I believe that holds true for e-type as well. Dura-Ace has also used aluminum FD cages since the 7700 series. Aluminum cages hold up OK, I think they're just expensive to make.

On the original topic... for the abovementioned reason, a low-clamp XTR FD would be the only Shimano mountain model that'll really give you a meaningful weight loss, and that's a lot of money, so the best bet is to stick with your Deore. Some weight-weenies will use a Dura-Ace front derailleur with a Speen pull-ratio adapter, which is considerably lighter yet.
mechBgon is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 09:58 PM
  #6  
Kimmo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,563
Likes: 736
From: Melbourne, Oz

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Originally Posted by mechBgon
For the record, XTR front derailleurs have used aluminum cages in all the low-clamp models since the 950 series, with the sole exception of the 985 variant that's built for 2-ring XTR Race cranksets. I believe that holds true for e-type as well. Dura-Ace has also used aluminum FD cages since the 7700 series. Aluminum cages hold up OK, I think they're just expensive to make.
Don't they give the ally thick nickel plating or something? I seem to remember something like that...

I reckon the optimal cage would be carbon with like .5mm stainless wear faces. But that's hilariously far into the land of diminishing returns...
Kimmo is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 10:29 PM
  #7  
mechBgon's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 6
Yeah, Dura-Ace and XTR aluminum FD cages are nickel-plated. As for carbon FD cages, Campagnolo's been there, done that. They actually hold up tolerably well too.

mechBgon is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 11:02 PM
  #8  
Kimmo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,563
Likes: 736
From: Melbourne, Oz

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Thought I'd seen em... looks like it's just the outer plate, which has a much easier job of it... inner looks like ti.

Wonder how they're secured, or do they move separately? That'd be cool.
Kimmo is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 11:33 PM
  #9  
mechBgon's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 6
The inner one is plated aluminum on that one. They're rigidly connected to eachother. SRAM does use a titanium cage on the Red front derailleur. The only FD I can recall that had an articulated cage was the old XTR 950 series, which we still have a few lurking in the basement at the LBS, mostly e-type.
mechBgon is offline  
Reply
Old 07-04-11 | 11:37 PM
  #10  
Kimmo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,563
Likes: 736
From: Melbourne, Oz

Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231

Kimmo is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chinarider
Road Cycling
17
04-10-26 12:58 PM
donheff
Fifty Plus (50+)
43
10-04-17 12:36 PM
bobbyl1966
General Cycling Discussion
53
08-10-15 04:02 PM
tomalenn
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
46
07-16-15 07:53 AM
pgjackson
Road Cycling
97
12-05-10 05:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.