asymmetric spindle wrong way
07-14-11, 07:56 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NH
Posts: 56
Bikes: 85 univega supra sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
asymmetric spindle wrong way
I just got into my possession a 1987 (or 1988? s# is 309256) Trek Elance 400 and quickly noticed that the bottom bracket spindle was longer on the non-drive side than the drive side by about 5mm. never having encountered such before, I just assumed it was wrong and so flipped its orientation while I was repacking the bottom bracket. the chain line was obviously amiss at that point, and so I put the spindle back to its original orientation and was left scratching my head as to why Trek would use an asymmetric spindle when they didn't need to, considering they had to orient it "backwards" to make the chain line correct.
Is there any particular reason this may have been done on this particular Trek, besides my initial thought that they had a surplus of spindles of this size that they needed to use up somehow. yeah, I am also making the assumption that this is the original spindle that this bicycle came from the factory with.
Is there any particular reason this may have been done on this particular Trek, besides my initial thought that they had a surplus of spindles of this size that they needed to use up somehow. yeah, I am also making the assumption that this is the original spindle that this bicycle came from the factory with.
07-14-11, 08:46 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,713
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,429 Posts
You my not have gotten far enough to check left arm/chainstay clearance, but that's one possibility.
Consider also that the total crank offset is based on the spindle length and the offset built into the cranks. If the right arm had more built in offset, the left side of the spindle would be longer to compensate, so pedal Q-factor was equal on both sides.
There could be other reasons including the overstock issue you mentioned (though I doubt it), but be aware that spindles longer on the left aren't all that rare.
Consider also that the total crank offset is based on the spindle length and the offset built into the cranks. If the right arm had more built in offset, the left side of the spindle would be longer to compensate, so pedal Q-factor was equal on both sides.
There could be other reasons including the overstock issue you mentioned (though I doubt it), but be aware that spindles longer on the left aren't all that rare.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
07-14-11, 10:37 PM
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: City of Brotherly Love
Posts: 1,562
Bikes: Raleigh Companion, Nashbar Touring, Novara DiVano, Trek FX 7.1, Giant Upland
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Did you check the Q-factor before disassembaly? It is possible that the wrong spindle got pulled for your particular build and the assembler did what they could to get the correct chainline.
07-15-11, 06:09 AM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
My 1993 Trek 7000 MTB also came with the bb spindle installed the "wrong" way, i.e. the longer side to the non-drive side. When I tried to correct this "mistake" the non-drive side crank arm hit the left chainstay so it was done intentionally.
