Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Convert to Threadless, or use Threadless Adaptor?

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Convert to Threadless, or use Threadless Adaptor?

Old 08-09-11 | 04:50 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Convert to Threadless, or use Threadless Adaptor?

I'm replacing the fork on my bike, since it's been bent in a collision with a car.

While I'm at it, I was thinking about switching to Threadless.
Since my quill stem is fixed at 45°, and I've always wanted it to be lower.

Which of these options seem best to you?
In cost, convenience, performance...

1. Buy: threadless fork + threadless headset + threadless stem.

2. Buy: another threaded fork + threadless stem adaptor + threadless stem.

Currently the fork, headset, and quill stem on my bike are the 1" size.
I'm not sure if I need to stick to the 1" size, or if the headtube can accommodate switching everything to the 1 1/8" size?

Thank You!!

Last edited by Zooom; 08-09-11 at 05:05 PM.
Zooom is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-11 | 05:13 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

First, if your headtube was made for a 1" headset and foirk, you must stick with 1". Other than having a frame builder remove and replace the headtube with a 1-1/8" one, there is no choice and that option would be absurdly expensive.

As long as you have to replace the fork, you might as well go threadless all the way so option 1 is my recommendation. You will have to buy and install a threadless headset but, overall, the new set up will be lighter and 1" threadless headsets are not that expensive (at least not if you avoid Chris King or similar).
HillRider is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-11 | 06:03 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Although some forum members might disagree (see numerous discussions on these threaded unthreaded headset issues in this forum), it is not absolutely necessary to find a threadless headset. You can make the threaded headset work for an unthreaded steerer: the most significant modification is to file out the threads of the upper lock nut so it fits over the new steerer tube (some washers (separators) might need a 'nose' removal too).
As proof of concept see https://www.petracycles.co.uk/headset-adapter-inch-silver-p-10505.html , a set which is not really needed, since filing of the head nut will do. Just the star-nut is needed, which every bike shop (hopefully) has.
Good luck!
saturnhr is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-11 | 06:36 PM
  #4  
CACycling's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,571
Likes: 16
From: Oxnard, CA

Bikes: 2009 Fuji Roubaix RC; 2011 Fuji Cross 2.0; '92 Diamond Back Ascent EX

I'd go threadless. I can't see installing something new knowing you'll need to use an adapter if there is a reasonable option.
CACycling is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-11 | 07:20 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Originally Posted by saturnhr
Although some forum members might disagree (see numerous discussions on these threaded unthreaded headset issues in this forum), it is not absolutely necessary to find a threadless headset. You can make the threaded headset work for an unthreaded steerer: the most significant modification is to file out the threads of the upper lock nut so it fits over the new steerer tube (some washers (separators) might need a 'nose' removal too).
You must file out the threads of the top bearing race, not the locknut which is unnecessary for a threadless headset. However, for decent bearing life and proper steering, these threads must be removed uniformly and have a smooth, close tolerance slip fit over the threadless steerer. If they are off center or a sloppy fit there will be steering problems and fork play. Remember, there will be no split cone centering ring in this arrangement. This is a job for a lathe and an operator who knows how to use one, not a guy with a file.

Pro mechanics used to do this on Dura Ace headsets back when Shimano sponsored teams had to use all-Shimano components, even though they never made threadless headsets. It's a stop-gap at best and a kludge at worst. Get the correct purpose-built headset.
HillRider is offline  
Reply
Old 08-09-11 | 07:30 PM
  #6  
clydeosaur's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
From: Central PA

Bikes: Cannondale Six5, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR & old Hard Rock

Treat yourself. You are replacing the fork anyway. Why not go for the threadless headset & stem with the new fork? Heck, throw a set of 31.8 ergobars & some new bartape on there.
clydeosaur is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MookieBlaylock
Bicycle Mechanics
15
06-02-18 09:45 PM
geoffbanksie
Bicycle Mechanics
4
10-04-13 11:54 AM
jpsawyer
Bicycle Mechanics
5
07-15-12 12:14 PM
worldtraveller
Bicycle Mechanics
4
07-12-11 02:13 AM
rickdog81
Bicycle Mechanics
14
01-01-10 04:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.