New chain, newish cassette, still skips
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 261
Bikes: 2011 Surly LHT, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2004 Giant Cypress, 1990 Simoncini Super Professional
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
New chain, newish cassette, still skips
I have about 2,500 miles on an LHT purchased six months ago.
On a ride last weekend, I experienced a little chain skip and auto shifting while mashing up some small but steep hills.
I figured in was time for a new chain. I purchased a SRAM PC971 9-speed chain, the same one that came on the new bike. I was prepared to cut it to fit, but right out of the box it was just slightly shorter that the chain I had removed -- not quite a link shorter.
I installed it and test rode it, and it still skips when I mash the cranks on the middle chain ring and the 11 or 13T cog on the cassette, a Shimano CS-HG50.
I'm sure the chain is threaded right. I see no obvious wear on the cogs.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks!
On a ride last weekend, I experienced a little chain skip and auto shifting while mashing up some small but steep hills.
I figured in was time for a new chain. I purchased a SRAM PC971 9-speed chain, the same one that came on the new bike. I was prepared to cut it to fit, but right out of the box it was just slightly shorter that the chain I had removed -- not quite a link shorter.
I installed it and test rode it, and it still skips when I mash the cranks on the middle chain ring and the 11 or 13T cog on the cassette, a Shimano CS-HG50.
I'm sure the chain is threaded right. I see no obvious wear on the cogs.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
If it's skipping on a cog, it's the cog not the chain. A new chain will be more likely to skip on a worn cog than will a worn chain. The amount of wear that causes skipping is pretty small and difficult to see by eye. Autoshifting is a separate problem unrelated to the chain, IMO.
I don't know what an "LTH" is but it seems odd that the new chain was shorter rather than longer and that 1 link shorter (1") was OK. Does an LTH have unusually long chainstays?
I don't know what an "LTH" is but it seems odd that the new chain was shorter rather than longer and that 1 link shorter (1") was OK. Does an LTH have unusually long chainstays?
#3
Retro Grouch
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,210
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Did you ever adjust the rear derailleur?
Edit. As the derailleur cable stretches it throws off the shifting as every shift is a little behind; this will first show it self with the small cogs because they have fewer teeth to hold on to the chain. There is a barrel shifter on the end of the derailleur where the cable/housing is attached; this needs to be truned counter clockwise (IE unscrew) to adjust out the stretch. If this is too basic hopefully you will give up some additional information..
Edit. As the derailleur cable stretches it throws off the shifting as every shift is a little behind; this will first show it self with the small cogs because they have fewer teeth to hold on to the chain. There is a barrel shifter on the end of the derailleur where the cable/housing is attached; this needs to be truned counter clockwise (IE unscrew) to adjust out the stretch. If this is too basic hopefully you will give up some additional information..
Last edited by onespeedbiker; 09-29-12 at 07:22 PM.
#4
Certified Bike Brat
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
If those are the gears you use the most suggest you measure the chain you junked. If its past the 100% wear mark chances are you've damaged the cassette sprockets. If on the other hand its below the 100% wear mark - suggest you check the cassette for proper torque. It slways surprises me how earily too many of them come off. The tightening torque is indicated on the locking ring of every brand and its a MINIMUM recommended value - usually 40 to 45 Nm.
#5
Retro Grouch
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,210
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's "LHT" and is short for the Surly Long Haul Trucker. Indeed the LHT was very long chainstays (460mm) and requires 116 links; the SRAM PC-71 chain comes in either 114 links or 116 links; the OP apparently bought the former..
Last edited by onespeedbiker; 09-29-12 at 07:22 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 261
Bikes: 2011 Surly LHT, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2004 Giant Cypress, 1990 Simoncini Super Professional
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The new chain was just barely shorter than the old. Not two links shorter.
Burton, what is the 100% wear mark?
Onespeedbiker, I did adjust the RD at about 1,200 miles for initial cable stretch.
Thanks again.
#7
Certified Bike Brat
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
6 Posts
See the section ln "measuring chain wear": https://sheldonbrown.com/chains.html
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,723
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5790 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
You have to separate skipping under load, (which is usually (but not always) because of chain or sprocket wear), from auto shifting or related issues, (which are usually because of poor trim, bent hanger, or related RD problems) .
Skipping under load, especially on smaller or the most used sprockets is classic, and most often shows up when the chain is replaced, but not the cassette. However, it's very possible to be fooled into thinking the skipping is in the rear when actually it's happening at the chainring since they feel and sound the same. My favorite way to diagnose chain skip takes two people.
Put the bike against a wall and have a friend attempt to ride through it. This lets you carefully observe the chain under load but not moving. On a bike prone to skipping the chain will move outward and appear to shift back on the chainring (actually the sprocket is moving forward) as the crank is loaded. At the cassette the chain moves out and forward slightly.
Skipping under load, especially on smaller or the most used sprockets is classic, and most often shows up when the chain is replaced, but not the cassette. However, it's very possible to be fooled into thinking the skipping is in the rear when actually it's happening at the chainring since they feel and sound the same. My favorite way to diagnose chain skip takes two people.
Put the bike against a wall and have a friend attempt to ride through it. This lets you carefully observe the chain under load but not moving. On a bike prone to skipping the chain will move outward and appear to shift back on the chainring (actually the sprocket is moving forward) as the crank is loaded. At the cassette the chain moves out and forward slightly.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 69
Bikes: 2004 Cannondale R3000, 1972 Raleigh Professional, 1976 Raleigh International 1990 Jamis Explorer, 1989 Bottecchia SLX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"slightly shorter that the chain I had removed -- not quite a link shorter"
If it less than a full link shorter that could be explained by "stretch" or wear of the chain. it is not uncommon for a chain to have gained an inch or more from wear. Did you match up some the chain rivets as you compared length?
If it less than a full link shorter that could be explained by "stretch" or wear of the chain. it is not uncommon for a chain to have gained an inch or more from wear. Did you match up some the chain rivets as you compared length?
#10
Mechanic/Tourist
"Mashing" on an 11 tooth cog is flat-out a bad idea. Due to the small number of teeth you will wear the cog down very quickly. You should be in the larger cogs on the larger chainwheel that have similar gear ratio. In my view there is only one time to use an 11 tooth gear, and that is when one is already at speed and you wish to lower your rpm's.
Last edited by cny-bikeman; 09-30-12 at 06:28 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Good advice from CNY-B.
I had an intermittent autoshifting hassle upon upgrading to 9spd I was having a hell of a time diagnosing, thinking it must have been previously negligible cable hassles as a result of the finer tolerances and shorter cable pull...
Turns out it was freehub body with excessive runout... took me a while to spot.
I had an intermittent autoshifting hassle upon upgrading to 9spd I was having a hell of a time diagnosing, thinking it must have been previously negligible cable hassles as a result of the finer tolerances and shorter cable pull...
Turns out it was freehub body with excessive runout... took me a while to spot.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
When chains are specified as being 114 or 116 links, it's really 1/2 links they're counting; counting inner and outer links separately. If you think of a chain as being made up of identical links that repeat, then a link comprises a set of inner and outer plates as well as two pins and two bushings. Both senses are used in cycling which can be a bit confusing. When you shorten (or lengthen) a chain, you can only do it in complete link increments, +/- 1 inch, not 1/2 links.
(Yes, depending on the size of the chain, there may be "half links" available, but bringing that up only further complicates the discussion without being relevant to the topic at hand)
(Yes, depending on the size of the chain, there may be "half links" available, but bringing that up only further complicates the discussion without being relevant to the topic at hand)
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 261
Bikes: 2011 Surly LHT, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2004 Giant Cypress, 1990 Simoncini Super Professional
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If those are the gears you use the most suggest you measure the chain you junked. If its past the 100% wear mark chances are you've damaged the cassette sprockets. If on the other hand its below the 100% wear mark - suggest you check the cassette for proper torque. It slways surprises me how earily too many of them come off. The tightening torque is indicated on the locking ring of every brand and its a MINIMUM recommended value - usually 40 to 45 Nm.
If I have to check the cassette torque, that's a LBS job for me.
Last edited by globie; 09-30-12 at 02:19 PM. Reason: addition
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 261
Bikes: 2011 Surly LHT, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2004 Giant Cypress, 1990 Simoncini Super Professional
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
However, it's very possible to be fooled into thinking the skipping is in the rear when actually it's happening at the chainring since they feel and sound the same. My favorite way to diagnose chain skip takes two people.
Put the bike against a wall and have a friend attempt to ride through it. This lets you carefully observe the chain under load but not moving. On a bike prone to skipping the chain will move outward and appear to shift back on the chainring (actually the sprocket is moving forward) as the crank is loaded. At the cassette the chain moves out and forward slightly.
Put the bike against a wall and have a friend attempt to ride through it. This lets you carefully observe the chain under load but not moving. On a bike prone to skipping the chain will move outward and appear to shift back on the chainring (actually the sprocket is moving forward) as the crank is loaded. At the cassette the chain moves out and forward slightly.
To me, that seems premature at 2,500 miles and without overly stretching the original chain. What do you think?
I haven't been able to try your two-person test yet ... maybe later today.
#15
Banned
just buy a new cassette, keep an eye on chain wear indication.
and prematurely replace the chain..
Rohloff makes a cog wear indicator.. if you want more tools.
KMC makes a digital chain wear indicator..
and prematurely replace the chain..
Rohloff makes a cog wear indicator.. if you want more tools.
KMC makes a digital chain wear indicator..
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,723
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5790 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
FB, you may have named it. While the rear cassette shows no wear to my eye, the cogs on the middle chain ring do look a bit worn.
To me, that seems premature at 2,500 miles and without overly stretching the original chain. What do you think?
I haven't been able to try your two-person test yet ... maybe later today.
To me, that seems premature at 2,500 miles and without overly stretching the original chain. What do you think?
I haven't been able to try your two-person test yet ... maybe later today.
If the ring does check out, then you're down to stiff links, hanger/RD alignment, & B screw adjustment (only if it skips on mid and larger sprockets).
As far as it being premature, it is early, but if the bike is ridden at high chain tension - heavy loads, hard climbing - it isn't impossible. Recently on this forum someone asked about chainring wear, and posted a photo of an unbelievably worn Campy inner, where the tooth edges were rolled to the side by the chains rollers.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
12" steel machinist's rule is probably the best way of determining when to replace chain. 1/16" elongation over 12" is the usual spec but I replace at 1/32" to prolong the life of the cassette and rings. I just replaced a chain showing just under 1/32" elongation after 4200 miles.
Chain gauges add in twice the roller wear which does not figure into chain elongation. Elongation is the critical determination that needs to be made and these gauges will have you replacing chains long before they need to be. I brought this up with the manufacturer of one of these gauges and they agreed.
Chain gauges add in twice the roller wear which does not figure into chain elongation. Elongation is the critical determination that needs to be made and these gauges will have you replacing chains long before they need to be. I brought this up with the manufacturer of one of these gauges and they agreed.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 4,852
Bikes: Click on the #YOLO
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
"Mashing" on an 11 tooth cog is flat-out a bad idea. Due to the small number of teeth you will wear the cog down very quickly. You should be in the larger cogs on the smaller chainwheel that have similar gear ratio. In my view there is only one time to use an 11 tooth gear, and that is when one is already at speed and you wish to lower your rpm's.
#21
Mechanic/Tourist
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Autobus
Bicycle Mechanics
8
08-16-10 07:44 PM