New cassette???
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,299
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4275 Post(s)
Liked 1,370 Times
in
951 Posts
A fairly typical set0up for people is a "compact" crank with 50 and 34 tooth chain rings and a 11-25 tooth cassette. A 11-28 cassette isn't uncommon.
It's possible that you could use a 12-30 with the Ultegra rear derailler you have (but you'd likely need a chain too). Though, that might be a bit too wide for 9 speed (with fewer cogs, the gaps between gears might be larger than you'd like).
Last edited by njkayaker; 04-08-13 at 11:19 AM.
#28
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 21
Bikes: Felt F65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
there's two RD-6500's, apparently, "SS" and "GS" (short swing, and I dunno what?). https://techdocs.shimano.com/media/te...9830611842.pdf says the SS version can handle 28T rear, while the GS can handle 27T
the SS has a 'total capacity' of 29T, while the GS has a 'total capacity' of 37T. Total capacity is the (bigfront + bigrear) - (smallfront + smallrear), eg the difference between the largest and the smallest gear range. I suspect the GS is for triples, so you undoubtably have the SS.
now, Shimano's specs are fairly conservative, you can usually exceed them by a few teeth...
anyways, 53 + X - (39 + 11) = 29, assuming you stick with an 11T high gear)... that gives... X = 29+39+11 - 53 = 26 with your current chain rings.
if you swapped that 53 for a 50, you could get a 29. if you could find a 9 speed cassette with a 13T high gear, you'd get 2 more on the low side, but sadly those seem to be uncommon or unobtanium.
frankly, the swap that makes the most sense is putting a 'compact crank' on there which is a 50-34 front, that would get you a 34T low gear instead of your 39T. but this is a more expensive swap, especially at Ultegra quality levels.
the SS has a 'total capacity' of 29T, while the GS has a 'total capacity' of 37T. Total capacity is the (bigfront + bigrear) - (smallfront + smallrear), eg the difference between the largest and the smallest gear range. I suspect the GS is for triples, so you undoubtably have the SS.
now, Shimano's specs are fairly conservative, you can usually exceed them by a few teeth...
anyways, 53 + X - (39 + 11) = 29, assuming you stick with an 11T high gear)... that gives... X = 29+39+11 - 53 = 26 with your current chain rings.
if you swapped that 53 for a 50, you could get a 29. if you could find a 9 speed cassette with a 13T high gear, you'd get 2 more on the low side, but sadly those seem to be uncommon or unobtanium.
frankly, the swap that makes the most sense is putting a 'compact crank' on there which is a 50-34 front, that would get you a 34T low gear instead of your 39T. but this is a more expensive swap, especially at Ultegra quality levels.
#29
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 21
Bikes: Felt F65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You have a "racing" set-up. It's not clear why you ended up with that. It isn't likely to be the best for you (it's geared too high).
A fairly typical set0up for people is a "compact" crank with 50 and 34 tooth chain rings and a 11-25 tooth cassette. A 11-28 cassette isn't uncommon.
It's possible that you could use a 12-30 with the Ultegra rear derailler you have (but you'd likely need a chain too). Though, that might be a bit too wide for 9 speed (with fewer cogs, the gaps between gears might be larger than you'd like).
A fairly typical set0up for people is a "compact" crank with 50 and 34 tooth chain rings and a 11-25 tooth cassette. A 11-28 cassette isn't uncommon.
It's possible that you could use a 12-30 with the Ultegra rear derailler you have (but you'd likely need a chain too). Though, that might be a bit too wide for 9 speed (with fewer cogs, the gaps between gears might be larger than you'd like).
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
The cheapest, easiest, and possibly best solution is to just get a 12-27 and a new chain. If that's low enough, great. If not, then consider a compact.
#31
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,630
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Before recommending lots of radical parts swaps, we need to keep in mind that the 650C wheels drop the gearing somewhat -- her 39x23 low gear is exactly the same as a 39x25 gear on a 700x23 road bike, and a cassette with a 28T cog would give her a nice 34" low gear.
#32
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 21
Bikes: Felt F65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not that hard to figure out -- most people just buy a bike, and they might not count up all the gear teeth like us dweebs.
Before recommending lots of radical parts swaps, we need to keep in mind that the 650C wheels drop the gearing somewhat -- her 39x23 low gear is exactly the same as a 39x25 gear on a 700x23 road bike, and a cassette with a 28T cog would give her a nice 34" low gear.
Before recommending lots of radical parts swaps, we need to keep in mind that the 650C wheels drop the gearing somewhat -- her 39x23 low gear is exactly the same as a 39x25 gear on a 700x23 road bike, and a cassette with a 28T cog would give her a nice 34" low gear.
#33
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 21
Bikes: Felt F65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's not that hard to figure out -- most people just buy a bike, and they might not count up all the gear teeth like us dweebs.
Before recommending lots of radical parts swaps, we need to keep in mind that the 650C
wheels drop the gearing somewhat -- her 39x23 low gear is exactly the same as a 39x25 gear on a 700x23 road bike, and a cassette with a 28T cog would give her a nice 34" low gear.
Before recommending lots of radical parts swaps, we need to keep in mind that the 650C
wheels drop the gearing somewhat -- her 39x23 low gear is exactly the same as a 39x25 gear on a 700x23 road bike, and a cassette with a 28T cog would give her a nice 34" low gear.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,299
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4275 Post(s)
Liked 1,370 Times
in
951 Posts
I'm just listing the smallest and largest gears on the cassette on the rear wheel. You list all of them here:
it says rd-6500 via...posting picture soon. also I bought this bike used because of how short I was hahaa. the 650x23 tires worked better for me than the 700 and I want to say this bike may be a 2004-2005 model. I bought it from a gentleman (was his son's bike) and it may have only ridden three times and just sat in is garage for years.
Last edited by njkayaker; 04-08-13 at 12:16 PM.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NW UK
Posts: 418
Bikes: 1992 Marin Eldridge Grade, 2007 Kona PHD and 199? Trek 1000 (current build project)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
+1 On the cassette being the easiest/cheapest option to lower the gearing. If you kept the existing cassette and installed a 50/34 compact, it would lower your gearing nicely, but you would be left with the 'corn cob' gearing (i.e. the 1-tooth difference between (nearly all the) sprockets means you feel a very subtle difference between each gear, and it's range is more limited (i.e. from the lowest to the highest gear)).
Something like an 11-28, or a 13-28 would have a greater 'difference' between most gears (2 teeth), and it covers a broader range.
Then again, you might light the feel of that.
TBH, if there were an infinite number of gears on a bike, then such closely-spaced gearing would be fine for almost all uses, but in reality where you can only choose from a limited number of teeth in a defined range, I tend to find that greater gaps with more range are better (for general use).
As you've probably already sussed out, when cassettes are referred to as say 11-28, that means that it has 11 teeth on the smallest sprocket (highest gear) and 28 teeth on the largest. The more teeth, the lower the gear and easier to pedal.
With the older freewheels (as opposed to modern cassettes), you used to be able to choose all your sprockets on the rear 'off the peg' (literally - bike shops used to have a peg-board on the wall with all the differently-sized sprockets on them, and you'd choose which you wanted).
At the front, it's the other way round - the larger the chainring, the higher the gear, and vice versa.
Something like an 11-28, or a 13-28 would have a greater 'difference' between most gears (2 teeth), and it covers a broader range.
Then again, you might light the feel of that.
TBH, if there were an infinite number of gears on a bike, then such closely-spaced gearing would be fine for almost all uses, but in reality where you can only choose from a limited number of teeth in a defined range, I tend to find that greater gaps with more range are better (for general use).
As you've probably already sussed out, when cassettes are referred to as say 11-28, that means that it has 11 teeth on the smallest sprocket (highest gear) and 28 teeth on the largest. The more teeth, the lower the gear and easier to pedal.
With the older freewheels (as opposed to modern cassettes), you used to be able to choose all your sprockets on the rear 'off the peg' (literally - bike shops used to have a peg-board on the wall with all the differently-sized sprockets on them, and you'd choose which you wanted).
At the front, it's the other way round - the larger the chainring, the higher the gear, and vice versa.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,299
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4275 Post(s)
Liked 1,370 Times
in
951 Posts
Before recommending lots of radical parts swaps, we need to keep in mind that the 650C wheels drop the gearing somewhat -- her 39x23 low gear is exactly the same as a 39x25 gear on a 700x23 road bike, and a cassette with a 28T cog would give her a nice 34" low gear.
The easiest thing to do is to change the cassette to a 28T. It's quite possible that she could go to a 30T too.
Last edited by njkayaker; 04-08-13 at 12:17 PM.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
The lowest 9-speed road cassette offered by Shimano is the 12-27. It may be possible to buy an aftermarket or custom cassette like a 13-28 and run it with the 6500 rear derailleur.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,299
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4275 Post(s)
Liked 1,370 Times
in
951 Posts
Actually she didn't say 650B. It's a road bike and I would assume the rims are 650c, like on my wife's bike. This size is a great idea for smaller people because it allows for a shorter top tube as well as more stand-over height.
The lowest 9-speed road cassette offered by Shimano is the 12-27. It may be possible to buy an aftermarket or custom cassette like a 13-28 and run it with the 6500 rear derailleur.
The lowest 9-speed road cassette offered by Shimano is the 12-27. It may be possible to buy an aftermarket or custom cassette like a 13-28 and run it with the 6500 rear derailleur.
The SRAM 950 speed cassette ($28) is 11-28 and might work with the chain and derailler she has.
I used that cassette on a 105 SS derailleur (I believe) set-up for a 11-25 cassette (and a compact) with just swapping the cassette. (I would have noticed if the shifting was poor even with it being on the bike I wasn't riding.)
The gear-inch difference between 700c and 650c with 23mm tires is about 3 inches. That's around the typical difference btween low gears, which means the smaller wheel size makes the gearing about "one" lower than 700c.
Gear inches.
..... 700/23c....650/23c
.....39....34....39....34
23..44.6..38.8..41.2..35.9
25..41.0..35.7..37.9..33.1
28..36.6..31.9..33.9..29.1
I use a 11-28 on a 50/34 compact and I climb lots of hills.
With the 28 rear with the 39 chainring, she'd get two lower gears (but a "half step" larger than my lowest). Going to a compact would give her one even-lower gear (for a lot more money).
Yes. She'd have about two lower gears going from 23 to 27 or 28.
Last edited by njkayaker; 04-08-13 at 05:19 PM.
#40
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 21
Bikes: Felt F65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, I was able to put a 12-27 cassette on this bike. Going to give it a try on the next group ride on Wednesday. thanks all for your help.
#41
Mechanic/Tourist
Good luck! Incidentally, your new low gear will be 15% easier to pedal than the old one - (1-23/27)*100=15%.
#42
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 21
Bikes: Felt F65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I found it much easier to keep myself in a spin with this cassette without my knees or legs screaming at me hahaha. I am provably going to be looking into a new bike possibly, a 10 speed and going to find a frame that may fit me with a 700c tire instead of the 650c. If I do, I just might keep this bike I have now at home on a mag trainer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
John1454
Road Cycling
3
01-08-16 12:35 PM