Crank compatability
#3
I've run both cranks, and am pretty sure I used a 110mm bottom bracket for both. So your chainline should be fine as well.


As rccardr noted, you can swap the chainrings between the two cranks as well, if you prefer to stick with round rings over the biopace rings.


As rccardr noted, you can swap the chainrings between the two cranks as well, if you prefer to stick with round rings over the biopace rings.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 7
From: New York City
The reason I'm doing this is my present crank is 170 and the other is 175.My seat is all the way back but my foot doesn't sit on the pedals with the ball of my feet comfy more towards the middle of the foot.I thought it will be better with the 175.Or do you guys think getting a seat post with a longer setback is better?
#5
the sort of fit you are talking about should be covered by fore/aft adjustment of your saddle (and seatposts that can handle the proper amount of adjustment).
Crank length should be pretty much based on height - well technically on leg length (and a bit of variation for personal preference and pedaling style). How tall are you?
Crank length should be pretty much based on height - well technically on leg length (and a bit of variation for personal preference and pedaling style). How tall are you?
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 7
From: New York City
I'm 5'8".My seat is all the way back and I have a slight bendof the knees when I pedal,so I think the height is right.The bike is a pinarello Montello(1989)54cm.I don't understand why the fit is so awkward.
#7
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
I don't understand why the fit is so awkward.
available from your current seat post, is too short, and the angle for the seat tube is too steep ..
Brand/model of frame is a mass production , the body of the rider is a variable..
the 5mm may be imperceptible, .. on its own..
i had a zero set back seat post , and a B 17 saddle, the combination of a saddle
with the ability, of a longer rail adjustment range, to shove it back, further ,
and a crank arm change from 170 to 180 gained an inch.
kept the seatpost, as it had a quality of suspension function
Last edited by fietsbob; 05-30-13 at 08:10 PM.
#10
would want to see a picture (that you took, or search the model online) of your current post to have an idea of this first. If you currently have a zero-setback post, then probably any standard post that has some setback would be an improvement.
This is assuming you actually need more setback (instead of just raising the seatpost slightly), and you don't sound particularly knowledgeable, but that's your call.
This is assuming you actually need more setback (instead of just raising the seatpost slightly), and you don't sound particularly knowledgeable, but that's your call.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 7
From: New York City
#14
would recommend you talk to someone who can judge your bike fit, in-person. Changing crankarm to something that's quite long for your height is not recommended, whatever the case.
if you want to get saddle moved back anyway, you could always get a downhill post.
if you want to get saddle moved back anyway, you could always get a downhill post.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#15
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 549
From: Pacific Northwest
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Universal Cycles sells MANY seatposts, including the Velo Orange Grand Cru long setback post (27.2mm only), which is a very nice post especially for having a two bolt attachment, so easier for subtle seat angle adjustments.
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...p?category=167
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...&category=4309
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...p?category=167
https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...&category=4309










