SRAM Powerlock re-use
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Creede CO in summer & Okeechobee, FL or TX Gulf Coast in winter
Posts: 742
Bikes: Zenetto Stealth road bike & Sundeal M7 MTN bike
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
SRAM Powerlock re-use
SRAM very clearly says Powerlock for one time use and must be replaced on a new chain. That makes sense. But why can't it be used again if just taking chain off to clean?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
No one seems to know exactly why SRAM says not to reuse it but I read one explanation that they have a patent interference problem if they allow reuse. If there is a mechanical reason, I've never heard about it.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Creede CO in summer & Okeechobee, FL or TX Gulf Coast in winter
Posts: 742
Bikes: Zenetto Stealth road bike & Sundeal M7 MTN bike
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Thanks. It's back on and chain will be given a good cleaning more often.
#5
rebmeM roineS
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,216
Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times
in
226 Posts
Powerlock is a 10 and 11 speed product - is that correct?
__________________
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,977
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1638 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
495 Posts
I recently reused one after removing the chain for cleaning and lube, I opened it up a second time when I replaced the RD, it popped open considerably easier the second time vs. the first. I then ordered a four pack so I can replace it and have some spares.
__________________
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
nine mile skid on a ten mile ride
#7
Senior Member
On my personal chains, I reuse them all the time. On customer bikes, we replace per SRAM service instruction. I always offer the old link back to customers as a spare to carry with them.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
12 Posts
It helps to have official removal pliers. It's possible to overstress joint where the pin is riveted into its side plate and have it come loose. I had that happen once out of (re)using these many times. I took it off the chain and a pin just fell out of its plate. I don't know if it's something I did, a faulty link, or what... It doesn't worry me.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,805
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1117 Post(s)
Liked 1,213 Times
in
770 Posts
I've reused it a couple of times, but then just bought a different brand of quicklink (maybe KMC? I'd have to look) that is "officially" reusable to use instead and put the used powerlock in the seat bag for a spare.
#10
Senior Member
I want to know how you get the dang things off. Needed to clean the rear cassette yesterday and could not get the chain off.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3389 Post(s)
Liked 5,564 Times
in
2,887 Posts
However, when you buy a KMC *chain* they randomly put either type in there, with no clue on the box which it is.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3389 Post(s)
Liked 5,564 Times
in
2,887 Posts
This works for both the latching and non-latching types.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
When I questioned the LBS mech why he had reused the quicklink contrary to SRAM guidelines,
He said "Huh, wut? Been reusing them for years, no prob."
My quicklink pliers hack:
https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-me...l#post16414716
He said "Huh, wut? Been reusing them for years, no prob."
My quicklink pliers hack:
https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-me...l#post16414716
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
I never knew SRAM links were not reusable on 10 speed drivetrains. I thought it was only 11-speed where the issue occurred. I am pretty sure KMC, which is what I use now, does not recommend against reusing their link on a 10-speed chain, only on 11-speed.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3389 Post(s)
Liked 5,564 Times
in
2,887 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 9,547
Bikes: https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=152015&p=1404231
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1529 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times
in
510 Posts
Given that 9+s chains have flush pins and thus countersunk pin riveting, it seems reasonable that some design limitations are being approached as chains get narrower; a quick link generally requires two thicknesses on the side plate... It appears that some folks can design a reusable quick link for narrow chains (if SRAM's is really just sidestepping a patent, they need to get the informal word out); if they work well when used properly, they're definitely preferable to anything else, IMO.
Having to replace a link or pin for cleaning is a bit sub-optimal; once the chain's started to show some wear, you're introducing an unworn pin or two, which is going to generate some additional wear on rings and cogs due to the slight discrepancy in effective link pitch. I know it sounds pretty anal to mention it, but given the sometimes drastic effects of very subtle wear on drivetrains, I think it should be noted. It's tempting to re-use an old quick link on a new chain, but if you can see or rather feel any wear on the pins with your fingernail, don't do it.
Having to replace a link or pin for cleaning is a bit sub-optimal; once the chain's started to show some wear, you're introducing an unworn pin or two, which is going to generate some additional wear on rings and cogs due to the slight discrepancy in effective link pitch. I know it sounds pretty anal to mention it, but given the sometimes drastic effects of very subtle wear on drivetrains, I think it should be noted. It's tempting to re-use an old quick link on a new chain, but if you can see or rather feel any wear on the pins with your fingernail, don't do it.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Would it be possible for you to show photos of the two different models of connector. I can't find any references to them except here. Competitive Cyclist doesn't mention them on their KMC writeup but says KMC recommends reusing their connectors "two-three times" without any mention of latching or not latching. I have no idea which kind I have.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,086
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3389 Post(s)
Liked 5,564 Times
in
2,887 Posts
Would it be possible for you to show photos of the two different models of connector. I can't find any references to them except here. Competitive Cyclist doesn't mention them on their KMC writeup but says KMC recommends reusing their connectors "two-three times" without any mention of latching or not latching. I have no idea which kind I have.
Right now I'm not finding a close-up photo of the non-latching "reusable" version, but it is easy to describe. In the non-latching version, the raised area is the same thickness as the portion to the right, so it slips easily into position, and can be easily slipped back open with just finger pressure.
The KMC "reusable" link is just like the SRAM 8s & 9s PowerLINK (and the original SuperLink),
and the KMC "non-reusable" link is just like the SRAM 10s & 11s PowerLOCK.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,805
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1117 Post(s)
Liked 1,213 Times
in
770 Posts
in addition to the Sram powerlinks and powerlocks I've been using over the years, which are pretty much the same mechanism as the KMC links, I bought a couple of these in 9 and 10 speed last year. I haven't used them on the 10 speed chain yet, but have been using one without problem on a 9 speed bike. It is easier than the Sram or KMC links to remove with bare hands. Much different mechanism of action:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Alamitos, Calif.
Posts: 2,476
Bikes: Canyon Endurace
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1041 Post(s)
Liked 929 Times
in
542 Posts
Well I learned something new. I thought the term "reuse" meant they didn't want you to remove the quick links from the chain as in using a chain tool. I had no idea that it meant the act of releasing the chain in order to take it off and clean it.