peeling on carbon fork
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
peeling on carbon fork
My hybrid bike has a carbon fork. There is significant peeling on the fork, it looks like the coating that is over the carbon. What to do, if anything? Is this unsafe?
I'll try to post a picture, but my first download tries failed.
I'll try to post a picture, but my first download tries failed.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#4
Banned
looks like scuffing of the surface finish , 'Snow Bird' wear and tear?(multiple bikes on a rack for transport? ),
does more flake off ?
Touch up paint? add a bit of spray lacquer?
does more flake off ?
Touch up paint? add a bit of spray lacquer?
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I had no idea this was happening, it could be snowbird wear and tear.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,331
Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Not knowing much of anything about carbon fiber parts, and being paranoid about part failure, I would not be comfortable riding the bike in the condition until after it was inspected by a Cannondale Dealer.
Looks to me like it could be a manufacturing defect, or crash damage, not just cosmetic damage. It should be inspected before anymore riding on it.
Looks to me like it could be a manufacturing defect, or crash damage, not just cosmetic damage. It should be inspected before anymore riding on it.
#8
Banned
IDK about nail polish, ask the Trek dealer..
typical Composites are Epoxy with the CF fabric ..
typical Composites are Epoxy with the CF fabric ..
Last edited by fietsbob; 07-27-14 at 01:23 PM.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Not knowing much of anything about carbon fiber parts, and being paranoid about part failure, I would not be comfortable riding the bike in the condition until after it was inspected by a Cannondale Dealer.
Looks to me like it could be a manufacturing defect, or crash damage, not just cosmetic damage. It should be inspected before anymore riding on it.
Looks to me like it could be a manufacturing defect, or crash damage, not just cosmetic damage. It should be inspected before anymore riding on it.
There is a Trek dealer nearby, I suppose I could bring it to them for their thoughts. But, isn't just about anyone going to say replace the fork?
If I had to replace the fork to sell the bike, were could I find a cheap fork? The bike can't be worth more than a couple hundred bucks at this point.
#10
Banned
If it was a boat, you could sand the surface to roughen it up a bit. and mix and apply More Epoxy .. but the esthetics seem a paramount issue on bicycles .
hauling it back and forth between seasons and border states north and south, you may need to use more packing material around your bike in transit..
hauling it back and forth between seasons and border states north and south, you may need to use more packing material around your bike in transit..
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,331
Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
If you were here in CA, and were going to sell it, I'd say that the front fork is a lawsuit waiting to happen. I don't know how it is where you are.
Maybe do some research to find out what the value is for a bike without problems, and what it's worth as a parts donor. You may decide that it would not be economical to fix the bike before selling it, and to sell it without the front fork for use as parts. Or, you may decide that it's worth dumping money in the bike to fix it before selling it. If it's only worth $200-$300 as a running bike, I would not think it would be worth the cost of replacing the front fork before selling it.
On the other hand, if you took the time to check with Cannondale, they might be willing to replace the front fork under the frame warranty, not as cosmetic, or crash damage, but because it's a question of safety if they decide that the damage is a manufacturing problem/defect.
If you remove the front fork (with a written warning/disclaimer noting the front fork damage, and have the Buyer sign it), and sell the bike for parts, whatever the Buyer does with it is on him/her.
Maybe do some research to find out what the value is for a bike without problems, and what it's worth as a parts donor. You may decide that it would not be economical to fix the bike before selling it, and to sell it without the front fork for use as parts. Or, you may decide that it's worth dumping money in the bike to fix it before selling it. If it's only worth $200-$300 as a running bike, I would not think it would be worth the cost of replacing the front fork before selling it.
On the other hand, if you took the time to check with Cannondale, they might be willing to replace the front fork under the frame warranty, not as cosmetic, or crash damage, but because it's a question of safety if they decide that the damage is a manufacturing problem/defect.
If you remove the front fork (with a written warning/disclaimer noting the front fork damage, and have the Buyer sign it), and sell the bike for parts, whatever the Buyer does with it is on him/her.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 1,538
Bikes: Lynskey Twisted Helix Di2 Ti, 1987 Orbea steel single speed/fixie, Orbea Avant M30, Trek Fuel EX9.8 29, Trek Madone 5 series, Specialized Epic Carbon Comp 29er, Trek 7.1F
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Looks like bike rack damage to me.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
It rides in a Yakima rack that wouldn't have a place for that kind of damage. But for sure the front fork looks scuffed in a number of spots. I just don't know why or how. I will say that most of our bikes do not look pristine (other than my CF Madone) so we probably are not as careful as we could be.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,800
Bikes: Lots of English 3-speeds, a couple of old road bikes, 3 mountain bikes, 1 hybrid, and a couple of mash-ups
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 335 Times
in
225 Posts
I don't have a carbon bike - all of mine are either steel or aluminum. If I did want to buy a carbon bike, or one with a carbon fork, it would not be yours. Sorry.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Will any threadless fork for a 26 inch wheeled bike work as a replacement?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 700
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD10 Team, Giant TCR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To me, it just looks that the clear lacquer was scratched off, just cosmetic damage. It's fine and hasn't compromised the integrity of the carbon underneath.
If the fork has pretty deep gouges (run a finger over the exposed area), then I'd start to worry.
If the fork has pretty deep gouges (run a finger over the exposed area), then I'd start to worry.
#17
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
Carbon forks are of "iffy" in the first place, it looks like an accident waiting to happen. Remember carbon forks "plastic forks" dont crack or bend like a metal fork, they shatter and put you on the ground.
Last edited by rydabent; 07-28-14 at 06:08 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: socal
Posts: 4,265
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 883 Post(s)
Liked 823 Times
in
622 Posts
Considering the ramifications of front fork failure, I wouldn't sell it as is even with a disclaimer. Either remove the fork and sell it or purchase an inexpensive fork (Check Nashbar today - 21% off and free shipping).
#21
Banned
Will any threadless fork for a 26 inch wheeled bike work as a replacement?
.. taller, longer blades, different rake , No.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Well, we drove the distance to the Cannondale dealer. They said the fork is just fine, it is cosmetic peeling of the paint or whatever they call the thick clear coat. Of course, it is outside the warranty period for paint. They said nail polish to neaten it up is fine.
So, I'll sell it and tell people what they said and what I did.
So, I'll sell it and tell people what they said and what I did.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,331
Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
One hour of an attorney's time will cost more than you are going to be able to sell that bike for. After getting dragged into Family Court on a monthly basis for twenty years by my ex-wife, I'm probably more sensitive to legal action risks/threats than most other people.
So to me, any extra money you might get selling the bike whole (what, $50?), vs as parts, without the front fork is not worth the potential legal risk.
Just because you tell a potential Buyer that you had the bike inspected, and what the shop said (who knows for sure, it's carbon fiber), will not protect you if the buyer gets hurt. You're still going to get dragged into Court.
So to me, any extra money you might get selling the bike whole (what, $50?), vs as parts, without the front fork is not worth the potential legal risk.
Just because you tell a potential Buyer that you had the bike inspected, and what the shop said (who knows for sure, it's carbon fiber), will not protect you if the buyer gets hurt. You're still going to get dragged into Court.
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
One hour of an attorney's time will cost more than you are going to be able to sell that bike for. After getting dragged into Family Court on a monthly basis for twenty years by my ex-wife, I'm probably more sensitive to legal action risks/threats than most other people.
So to me, any extra money you might get selling the bike whole (what, $50?), vs as parts, without the front fork is not worth the potential legal risk.
Just because you tell a potential Buyer that you had the bike inspected, and what the shop said (who knows for sure, it's carbon fiber), will not protect you if the buyer gets hurt. You're still going to get dragged into Court.
So to me, any extra money you might get selling the bike whole (what, $50?), vs as parts, without the front fork is not worth the potential legal risk.
Just because you tell a potential Buyer that you had the bike inspected, and what the shop said (who knows for sure, it's carbon fiber), will not protect you if the buyer gets hurt. You're still going to get dragged into Court.
Keep in mind, you admittedly know nothing about carbon parts and you suggested the inspection:
Not knowing much of anything about carbon fiber parts, and being paranoid about part failure, I would not be comfortable riding the bike in the condition until after it was inspected by a Cannondale Dealer.
Looks to me like it could be a manufacturing defect, or crash damage, not just cosmetic damage. It should be inspected before anymore riding on it.
Looks to me like it could be a manufacturing defect, or crash damage, not just cosmetic damage. It should be inspected before anymore riding on it.
BTW, I am a retired lawyer.
Last edited by goldfinch; 07-28-14 at 05:00 PM.