Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

82/83mm BB compatability

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

82/83mm BB compatability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-14 | 09:12 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne

Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.

82/83mm BB compatability

Another simple (dumb) question, but BBs are not a specialty...

I'm trying to replace the BBs on my Burley tandem, the internet lists the BBs as 82x121mm (but I will double check any markings when I pull the units, especially as it seems like the front BB shell measures 73mm wide). I'm not finding any google listings for 82mm, but I am finding 83s. Since they are threaded into the shell, is this a big deal? Am I mistaken in thinking the 82x121mm refers to a 82mm shell width and not the diameter of the shell?

* Reprinted in the Tandem Bikes forum*
LastKraftWagen is offline  
Reply
Old 09-06-14 | 01:20 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,687
Likes: 301
In 82x121 the 82 is the width/length of the BB shell, measured across the bike, along the axle. Not the diameter. It's officiellt called width as opposed to length as the effect it has on the finished frame is width.
The 121 is the effective axle length. If it's an old square taper with threaded stumps sticking out, don't measure the stumps.
I wouldn't worry about being 1 mm off on BB shell width. At worst, if you're 1mm short you can use a spacer/washer to get the BB cup further out.
An 82 mm BB shell diameter would be huge. Maybe if you have an eccentric in there to adjust chain tension.

Last edited by dabac; 09-06-14 at 01:26 AM.
dabac is offline  
Reply
Old 09-06-14 | 12:07 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
From: Wind Tunnels of Cheyenne

Bikes: Burley Duet [of some unknown year] (the guinea pig); 2001 Ventana ECDM (the project); And always one less than I think I really need.

Yeah, 82mm diameter sounded a little huge, but being blind the measurement process is, well, involved, and I just hadn't done it yet.

"A mm short" can be resolved with a spacer, but what about a mm long, as this is the situation I think I'm running into. If I read correctly (and chances are I didn't), the English thread is 29 TPI (aprox 1.14 threads/mm), so I'm guessing about half a thread too long per side isn't a concern???
LastKraftWagen is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jessejoshua
Classic & Vintage
3
07-23-18 09:59 AM
fastbike
Bicycle Mechanics
5
02-11-16 10:44 AM
rideone
Classic & Vintage
2
07-08-10 12:42 PM
JoeF45
Bicycle Mechanics
8
06-19-10 09:07 AM
Amoxicillin
Bicycle Mechanics
2
06-08-10 06:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.