De Rosa 1976
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Whiefish, Montana
Posts: 286
Bikes: 1970 Cilo Pacer, 1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professional, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2015 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
De Rosa 1976
I don't know the brand/models, but know they're cherished.
Here are some newer photos.
Frame is straight, no dents, ripples, rust is surface only. Probably deserves a repaint.







Here are some newer photos.
Frame is straight, no dents, ripples, rust is surface only. Probably deserves a repaint.
__________________
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti
Last edited by american psycho; 03-05-15 at 12:39 PM.

#4
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,230
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 338 Times
in
171 Posts
I don't think it's original either, and I hate the repaint, but if it's a 76' De Rosa it will go far higher than indicated above (assuming buyers can verify it is a mid-70s De Rosa). A 70's De Rosa doesn't play by the normal rules - they're so rare and prized. A 60s one even more so.

#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 14,100
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 100 Times
in
73 Posts
I don't think it's original either, and I hate the repaint, but if it's a 76' De Rosa it will go far higher than indicated above (assuming buyers can verify it is a mid-70s De Rosa). A 70's De Rosa doesn't play by the normal rules - they're so rare and prized. A 60s one even more so.
OP, do some leg work to determine it's approximate year and authenticity. I'm not a derosa expert by any stretch of the imagination but the 3 I've owned all had 'DeRosa' engraved into the fork crown. Maybe the older ones didn't.

#6
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,230
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 338 Times
in
171 Posts
I'm not an expert either, but I think that engraving is correct for the period. I don't know the time lines, and I'm not even sure there is 100% consistent usage, but I do think they used different engravings before the one you mention.

#7
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Whiefish, Montana
Posts: 286
Bikes: 1970 Cilo Pacer, 1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professional, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2015 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
I dated it using the pictures I found on Classic Rendezvous, although I may be off by a year, since the one I posted has long drop outs, and no cable-guides.
The fork crown matches, in any case.
I really don't need a restoration project, but I've snagged the pantographed stem and the shifting parts, and have the rest of the parts in the basement - just don't want to paint anymore...
Here's the 76 on CR
The fork crown matches, in any case.
I really don't need a restoration project, but I've snagged the pantographed stem and the shifting parts, and have the rest of the parts in the basement - just don't want to paint anymore...
Here's the 76 on CR
__________________
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti

#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 14,100
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 100 Times
in
73 Posts
Who says you have to restore it? It you have all the parts to complete the build and the price matches condition go for it. Something like that will always holds value.

#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,169
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3018 Post(s)
Liked 2,196 Times
in
1,581 Posts
For me the chain stays will help define its year. At this point I would be inclined to push it earlier. Appears to be a 56-57 center to top.
Condition of the fork crown chrome will also have a bearing on the value.
To me a 56 would be worth $1,000. Given no major foibles. A repainted always brings questions.
Condition of the fork crown chrome will also have a bearing on the value.
To me a 56 would be worth $1,000. Given no major foibles. A repainted always brings questions.

#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,755
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 555 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 127 Times
in
74 Posts
You know, that could be repainted. But maybe not. Is there evidence of an earlier color under the blue on that top tube rusty bare patch? Paint looks like it has some age to it for sure. And if it's an earlier model, perhaps it's right.
Just trying look on the half-full side.
which is out of character for me. :>
Just trying look on the half-full side.
which is out of character for me. :>

#11
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Whiefish, Montana
Posts: 286
Bikes: 1970 Cilo Pacer, 1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professional, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2015 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
More Photos
I'd say paint is original by the looks of it.







__________________
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti

#12
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,230
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 338 Times
in
171 Posts
This is now being flipped on the CR list at the suggested $1000 price for frame. I really hope the OP didn't come to us for advice so he could flip to the community.
Also - for the record, the OP edited out some verbiage asking others not to bid because he wanted it so much.
Also - for the record, the OP edited out some verbiage asking others not to bid because he wanted it so much.
Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 03-06-15 at 05:01 PM.

#13
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Whiefish, Montana
Posts: 286
Bikes: 1970 Cilo Pacer, 1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professional, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2015 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
It's a rare bike, I don't have time to restore, and you should keep your opinions to yourself.
If the frame doesn't sell, I'll get it repainted, build it up, and sell it for even more, but only if KonAaron Snake is OK with my pricing ;-)
__________________
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti
Last edited by american psycho; 03-07-15 at 06:40 AM.

#14
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,230
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 338 Times
in
171 Posts
No - I won't keep my opinion to myself in this case. What you did was tacky as hell. I'm no communist, and I've certainly flipped my share of bikes, but when I ask for advice, I explain I'm flipping it on the front end. I don't come back and flip it to the people that helped me. I also don't edit out the post to try and hide that's what I did.
SLIMEY
SLIMEY

#15
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Whiefish, Montana
Posts: 286
Bikes: 1970 Cilo Pacer, 1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professional, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2015 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
1 Post
I think tacky would be to put it on ebay.
i didn't edit to hide anything but rather to add info.
your accusations strike me as paranoid, and your slander as immaturity.
The purpose of this forum is to establish value, for purchasing or selling, get a life.
i didn't edit to hide anything but rather to add info.
your accusations strike me as paranoid, and your slander as immaturity.
The purpose of this forum is to establish value, for purchasing or selling, get a life.
__________________
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti
1972 Colnago Super, 1972 Bianchi Specialissima Professionale, 1998 Colnago Monotitan, 2014 Salsa Horsethief, 2015 Salsa Mukluk Ti

#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 15,220
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 819 Post(s)
Liked 246 Times
in
139 Posts
No - I won't keep my opinion to myself in this case. What you did was tacky as hell. I'm no communist, and I've certainly flipped my share of bikes, but when I ask for advice, I explain I'm flipping it on the front end. I don't come back and flip it to the people that helped me. I also don't edit out the post to try and hide that's what I did.
SLIMEY
SLIMEY

#19
Senior Member
That's pretty shoddy workmanship, something I would not associate with De Rosa...and the non-drive pantographing seems slightly crooked and it would seem that the "D" is shallower than the "A", at lewst from the photo displayed here.

#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,169
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3018 Post(s)
Liked 2,196 Times
in
1,581 Posts
Indeed. This bike was built after DeRosa became known, so volumes were increasing.
The seat stay caps are just identification stamped, so the variation is an unsquare hit or variable thickness, I don't know if these frames got plugs or caps.
This frame is still pretty rare, but later than my primary interest. A '73 or '74 would be the one to really pursue, but would fetch more too.
Not shown is the seatpost lug slot, for a time the slot was just an unfinished saw cut, no attempt to provide a stress relief at the root.
Ugo was obviously in transition from small builder to manufacturer.
I don't think it should be of any surprise that this frame is being flipped, history provides adequate precedent.
Not part of the CR group, so no comments from me there.
The seat stay caps are just identification stamped, so the variation is an unsquare hit or variable thickness, I don't know if these frames got plugs or caps.
This frame is still pretty rare, but later than my primary interest. A '73 or '74 would be the one to really pursue, but would fetch more too.
Not shown is the seatpost lug slot, for a time the slot was just an unfinished saw cut, no attempt to provide a stress relief at the root.
Ugo was obviously in transition from small builder to manufacturer.
I don't think it should be of any surprise that this frame is being flipped, history provides adequate precedent.
Not part of the CR group, so no comments from me there.

#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 15,220
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 819 Post(s)
Liked 246 Times
in
139 Posts
Indeed. This bike was built after DeRosa became known, so volumes were increasing.
The seat stay caps are just identification stamped, so the variation is an unsquare hit or variable thickness, I don't know if these frames got plugs or caps.
This frame is still pretty rare, but later than my primary interest. A '73 or '74 would be the one to really pursue, but would fetch more too.
Not shown is the seatpost lug slot, for a time the slot was just an unfinished saw cut, no attempt to provide a stress relief at the root.
Ugo was obviously in transition from small builder to manufacturer.
I don't think it should be of any surprise that this frame is being flipped, history provides adequate precedent.
Not part of the CR group, so no comments from me there.
The seat stay caps are just identification stamped, so the variation is an unsquare hit or variable thickness, I don't know if these frames got plugs or caps.
This frame is still pretty rare, but later than my primary interest. A '73 or '74 would be the one to really pursue, but would fetch more too.
Not shown is the seatpost lug slot, for a time the slot was just an unfinished saw cut, no attempt to provide a stress relief at the root.
Ugo was obviously in transition from small builder to manufacturer.
I don't think it should be of any surprise that this frame is being flipped, history provides adequate precedent.
Not part of the CR group, so no comments from me there.
I have seen that particular bicycle on several occasions and it doesn't have these slips.
Suggests to me that there was some range of finish/QC benchmarks.
I would guess this pictured example would still be a pretty sweet rider.

#23
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,230
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 338 Times
in
171 Posts
You indicated you were excited to add this to your collection in your post. You asked others not to bid because you were excited to own it. You edited it out afterwards. You implied in your sales post that you bought as a collector and were kindly moving it on.
How about this - you've acted like a dishonest sleaze ball who behaved poorly. You know you did because you edited it afterwards.
Had you been honest and said you wanted to flip it and wanted to know what it cost, there'd be no issue. The issue is that you were dishonest seeking advice and your sale ad, where you pretend it's part of your collection, is dishonest.
That's the last I'll say about it. At the end of the day you have to look in the mirror and deal with it.
Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 03-07-15 at 12:23 PM.

#24
Senior Member
There is a 1976 De Rosa in Minnetonka, MN that I will likely pick up in the next year or so.
I have seen that particular bicycle on several occasions and it doesn't have these slips.
Suggests to me that there was some range of finish/QC benchmarks.
I would guess this pictured example would still be a pretty sweet rider.
I have seen that particular bicycle on several occasions and it doesn't have these slips.
Suggests to me that there was some range of finish/QC benchmarks.
I would guess this pictured example would still be a pretty sweet rider.
Does anyone have photos of similar slip-ups on a De Rosa from this period?
I still find it hard to believe that Ugo would have let a bike with his name on it leave the shop in such a state.

#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 15,220
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 819 Post(s)
Liked 246 Times
in
139 Posts
FWIW The fellow I am buying it from is one of the most private bike collectors I have yet to meet.
I sold him three bicycles over the last eight years after we met at a local bike shop.
I have been invited to see the bikes from time to time and it is always a joy.
He has a very nice collection that ranges from the early 1960s up to the early 1990s.
Mainly racing bicycles.
