![]() |
F = ma
|
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 17965001)
Unfortunately, my mechanic seems to be spending all of his time these days riding rather than wrenching.
This engineer can't be bothered. He's about to make ladies uncomfortable at a party. |
You might be able to have the best of both worlds. Can you position the FD so the chain rubs and the crankarm hits it?
|
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 17965001)
Unfortunately, my mechanic seems to be spending all of his time these days riding rather than wrenching.
Sounds like a smart mechanic :innocent:. |
Originally Posted by jimmuller
(Post 17965114)
Consider the time duration of each of the rubbing events. The crank arm thickness is maybe equivalent to two chain links. The ring was, what, a 52T? The constant rubbing would be in effect for 26 times longer. Both would be at approximately the same radius to the spindle. So unless the derailleur-strike event applied 26 times more ******ing force, the rubbing would definitely produce more drag.
Originally Posted by USAZorro
(Post 17965153)
You might be able to have the best of both worlds. Can you position the FD so the chain rubs and the crankarm hits it?
|
Energy loss due to friction, rubbing and grinding on a bike is not a tolerable question......regarding the fairer sex? There are special forums for that :rolleyes:
But seriously, no one believes you'd ride more than a few hundred feet with a rub or a click, just impossible. |
It might depend on how hard you ride. If you ride hard, the chain rubbing against the derailleur could cause a greater loss of energy than the banging of the crank against the derailleur. The friction from the chain rubbing is likely to increase as your effort increases. On the other hand, the crank bangs the derailleur when you're applying more power to the opposite crank, so the crank banging the derailleur is probably not banging it hard. And that force decreases as your pedaling effort increases.
So if you're tooling around, let the chain rub. If you're mashing hard, let the crank bang. |
Originally Posted by noglider
(Post 17965355)
crank bang.
|
Let's see...
71 plus six times 99 divided by 2 or 3 Added on to 360. 32. |
Originally Posted by Velognome
(Post 17965347)
But seriously, no one believes you'd ride more than a few hundred feet with a rub or a click, just impossible.
Originally Posted by noglider
(Post 17965355)
It might depend on how hard you ride. If you ride hard, the chain rubbing against the derailleur could cause a greater loss of energy than the banging of the crank against the derailleur. The friction from the chain rubbing is likely to increase as your effort increases. On the other hand, the crank bangs the derailleur when you're applying more power to the opposite crank, so the crank banging the derailleur is probably not banging it hard. And that force decreases as your pedaling effort increases.
So if you're tooling around, let the chain rub. If you're mashing hard, let the crank bang.
Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
(Post 17965521)
32.
|
.
...has anyone yet considered the weight savings gained in comparing the two different mechanical interference mechanisms as a function of time ? |
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
(Post 17965656)
.
...has anyone yet considered the weight savings gained in comparing the two different mechanical interference mechanisms as a function of time ? |
For that matter, isn't the terrain around Boston rather flat? Could probably go with a single ring up front and remove the FD entirely. :p
|
Originally Posted by rhm
(Post 17964162)
I assume your derailleur has the safety lip on the front of the cage? I'd switch it out to one with a flat outer plate.
|
Okay, I'm convinced this FD is a POC. Anyone want to trade me a lip-less Campy NR or SR for this post-CPSC SR model? (and, yes, I'm serious--straight trade.)
|
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 17965823)
Okay, I'm convinced this FD is a POC. Anyone want to trade me a lip-less Campy NR or SR for this post-CPSC SR model? (and, yes, I'm serious--straight trade.)
Great book, sorry I loaned it out. Anyone knows a Record front derailleur has less friction than a Super Record as there are no holes to catch the chain pins on from classic 3/32" derailleur chains. Why do you think Campagnolo went from 4 cage holes to 3? Surely not for aesthetics. |
The constant rub will reduce material, achieving a lower mass, at the same time, the rider exerting additional force to overcome said fricture will convert mass to energy at a higher rate........maybe it's good they rub?
|
Originally Posted by southpawboston
(Post 17964299)
For Neal to pose a mechanical inquiry indicates a serious problem given his Mad Mechanix Skilz.
I don't think the resistance caused by either rub scenario is significant enough to worry about. I would be more concerned about the annoying rubbing noise and eventual wear on the cage (or crank arm). As Rudi suggested, an FD with flatter cage will solve the problem (and there are plenty of flat-cage FDs out there to choose from), but so might using a slightly longer BB spindle. You could also file away that lip on the front of the cage, but then it might start rusting. |
Originally Posted by 3alarmer
(Post 17965656)
.
...has anyone yet considered the weight savings gained in comparing the two different mechanical interference mechanisms as a function of time ? |
Originally Posted by old's'cool
(Post 17966050)
What I would do, if I were paid commensurately that is, is conducted a controlled experiment with both configurations, with careful weighing of the affected parts before and after. The parts with the greatest loss of mass will be on the configuration with the most net drag.
|
Originally Posted by nlerner
(Post 17965823)
Okay, I'm convinced this FD is a POC. Anyone want to trade me a lip-less Campy NR or SR for this post-CPSC SR model? (and, yes, I'm serious--straight trade.)
|
I think the answer is to drink more and listen less.
That's what I do when encountering physics. |
This is clearly the result of the Greek banking crisis. Since you can only take 60 euro's at a time from the atm, you will have to wait a couple of days to gather the funds to buy a new FD.
|
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
(Post 17966381)
There's nothing wrong with your SR front derailleur; it's just not designed to work with pre-CPSC cranks. As I have a number of vintage cranks that need the pre-CSPC version, I'm reluctant part with any usable front derailleurs. Other front derailleurs that will work include Zeus Criterium, 1st edition Dura-Ace, SunTour Compe, SL, or 1st edition Cyclone, and Simplex Super LJ, among others.
Originally Posted by RobbieTunes
(Post 17966438)
I think the answer is to drink more and listen less.
That's what I do when encountering physics.
Originally Posted by fender1
(Post 17966452)
This is clearly the result of the Greek banking crisis. Since you can only take 60 euro's at a time from the atm, you will have to wait a couple of days to gather the funds to buy a new FD.
|
I think I have something for you, Neal, but it will be some days before I can check, and I will have forgotten by then, so: good luck with that! :thumb:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.