Estimate size for this Bianchi
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Estimate size for this Bianchi
This vintage Bianchi has 24 inch wheel, 50cm seat tube and 53cm top tube. I have not seen the bike, just images. Any idea what size person it would suit?
Last edited by joehayes999; 10-13-15 at 05:33 AM.
#4
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Thanks for the info.
A couple of inches too short for me. I find it difficult to get vintage bikes in my size, I am 5'7ish and inseam is 30". Most vintages I have seen are way bigger. I was looking at a 54x54 Motobecane but the standover height was 31" so it wouldn't work for me. Modern bikes work ok because of the sloping top tube. So I guess I am looking at a 52 seat tube and 52 - 54 Top tube or thereabouts, but I'm not finding any.
A couple of inches too short for me. I find it difficult to get vintage bikes in my size, I am 5'7ish and inseam is 30". Most vintages I have seen are way bigger. I was looking at a 54x54 Motobecane but the standover height was 31" so it wouldn't work for me. Modern bikes work ok because of the sloping top tube. So I guess I am looking at a 52 seat tube and 52 - 54 Top tube or thereabouts, but I'm not finding any.
#5
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
#6
Thrifty Bill

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,642
Likes: 1,106
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Thanks for the info.
A couple of inches too short for me. I find it difficult to get vintage bikes in my size, I am 5'7ish and inseam is 30". Most vintages I have seen are way bigger. I was looking at a 54x54 Motobecane but the standover height was 31" so it wouldn't work for me. Modern bikes work ok because of the sloping top tube. So I guess I am looking at a 52 seat tube and 52 - 54 Top tube or thereabouts, but I'm not finding any.
A couple of inches too short for me. I find it difficult to get vintage bikes in my size, I am 5'7ish and inseam is 30". Most vintages I have seen are way bigger. I was looking at a 54x54 Motobecane but the standover height was 31" so it wouldn't work for me. Modern bikes work ok because of the sloping top tube. So I guess I am looking at a 52 seat tube and 52 - 54 Top tube or thereabouts, but I'm not finding any.
Also, vintage bikes tended to take bigger jumps between sizes. Many brands went 2 full inches between sizes, which equals 5cm! Your target is way too narrow. And I don't see 52cm ST very often at all. Much more common is the 21 inch frame size, which is 53cm. I've owned well over 600 bikes, probably 100 were 53cm seat tube. I don't recall ever owning a single 52cm seat tube bike (sure, they are out there, but not very common). I find a lot of 23 inch seat tube bikes, some 21 inch, some 22 and 24 inch (some manufacturers went 22/24/26 inch frame sizes). Then a handful of 25 inch/25.5 inch and 19 inch. I've had three 18 inch (really rare).
Seat tube sizing by most manufacturers measured center to top.
And on TT length, realize you can play around with stem length to compensate for too long or too short TT. Sure, you want to be close, but a 2cm range is only about 3/4 of an inch.
FWIW, my inseam is 30 inches and I ride a 56/57. I pretty much have negative standover on every road bike I own, but I have a long torso and arms. I have a dual sport motorcycle with a 36 inch seat height. Talk about a stretch!
Size via TT length and you will find plenty.
Last edited by wrk101; 10-13-15 at 07:51 AM.
#7
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Learn to IGNORE stand over on sizing. Get a top tube length that fits you and you will do fine.
Also, vintage bikes tended to take bigger jumps between sizes. Many brands went 2 full inches between sizes, which equals 5cm! Your target is way too narrow. And I don't see 52cm ST very often at all. Much more common is the 21 inch frame size, which is 53cm. I've owned well over 600 bikes, probably 100 were 53cm seat tube. I don't recall ever owning a single 52cm seat tube bike (sure, they are out there, but not very common). I find a lot of 23 inch seat tube bikes, some 21 inch, some 22 and 24 inch (some manufacturers went 22/24/26 inch frame sizes). Then a handful of 25 inch/25.5 inch and 19 inch. I've had three 18 inch (really rare).
Seat tube sizing by most manufacturers measured center to top.
And on TT length, realize you can play around with stem length to compensate for too long or too short TT. Sure, you want to be close, but a 2cm range is only about 3/4 of an inch.
FWIW, my inseam is 30 inches and I ride a 56/57. I pretty much have negative standover on every road bike I own, but I have a long torso and arms. I have a dual sport motorcycle with a 36 inch seat height. Talk about a stretch!
Size via TT length and you will find plenty.
Also, vintage bikes tended to take bigger jumps between sizes. Many brands went 2 full inches between sizes, which equals 5cm! Your target is way too narrow. And I don't see 52cm ST very often at all. Much more common is the 21 inch frame size, which is 53cm. I've owned well over 600 bikes, probably 100 were 53cm seat tube. I don't recall ever owning a single 52cm seat tube bike (sure, they are out there, but not very common). I find a lot of 23 inch seat tube bikes, some 21 inch, some 22 and 24 inch (some manufacturers went 22/24/26 inch frame sizes). Then a handful of 25 inch/25.5 inch and 19 inch. I've had three 18 inch (really rare).
Seat tube sizing by most manufacturers measured center to top.
And on TT length, realize you can play around with stem length to compensate for too long or too short TT. Sure, you want to be close, but a 2cm range is only about 3/4 of an inch.
FWIW, my inseam is 30 inches and I ride a 56/57. I pretty much have negative standover on every road bike I own, but I have a long torso and arms. I have a dual sport motorcycle with a 36 inch seat height. Talk about a stretch!
Size via TT length and you will find plenty.
#8
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,398
Likes: 1,865
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Thanks for the info.
A couple of inches too short for me. I find it difficult to get vintage bikes in my size, I am 5'7ish and inseam is 30". Most vintages I have seen are way bigger. I was looking at a 54x54 Motobecane but the standover height was 31" so it wouldn't work for me. Modern bikes work ok because of the sloping top tube. So I guess I am looking at a 52 seat tube and 52 - 54 Top tube or thereabouts, but I'm not finding any.
A couple of inches too short for me. I find it difficult to get vintage bikes in my size, I am 5'7ish and inseam is 30". Most vintages I have seen are way bigger. I was looking at a 54x54 Motobecane but the standover height was 31" so it wouldn't work for me. Modern bikes work ok because of the sloping top tube. So I guess I am looking at a 52 seat tube and 52 - 54 Top tube or thereabouts, but I'm not finding any.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheMad_Arrow
Classic and Vintage Bicycles: Whats it Worth? Appraisals.
8
07-22-16 02:06 AM









