Alternatives to Panaracer Paselas
#26
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,014
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 281 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2200 Post(s)
Liked 4,631 Times
in
1,773 Posts
Those Continentals look pretty nice and are $34 at Ribble. But like IT said, only in 25 width.
If you want a Pasela higher quality alternative with with more volume, say 28, 32, 35, are you down to the Compass or Riv tires, or am I missing something?
[edit] I probably should have reiterated, with a tan sidewall.
If you want a Pasela higher quality alternative with with more volume, say 28, 32, 35, are you down to the Compass or Riv tires, or am I missing something?
[edit] I probably should have reiterated, with a tan sidewall.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,925
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4815 Post(s)
Liked 3,945 Times
in
2,566 Posts
Those are very different tires for different purposes. If you commute at night through a rainy (non-ice/snow) winter and you want a compromise tire that doesn't cost too much (so the flats, tears etc that happen riding all winter don't break the bank), doesn't flat too often, handles OK and OK in the wet and is available in all sizes so you can ride the biggest that fits on your bike, the Paselas aren't a bad tire at all. Compromise, yes, Good compromise? A lot of us think so.
Ben
Ben
#29
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
Panaracers don't flat often for you? That has not been my experience. The ribmos/t-servs are another matter...those are tough.
My gripe about Panaracers is that they really don't do anything well (other than look the part); they flat the same as Veloflex, if not worse, while not offering much road feel/performance.
For my money the best compromise tire is the GP 4 seasons. YMMV
My gripe about Panaracers is that they really don't do anything well (other than look the part); they flat the same as Veloflex, if not worse, while not offering much road feel/performance.
For my money the best compromise tire is the GP 4 seasons. YMMV
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,925
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4815 Post(s)
Liked 3,945 Times
in
2,566 Posts
Panaracers don't flat often for you? That has not been my experience. The ribmos/t-servs are another matter...those are tough.
My gripe about Panaracers is that they really don't do anything well (other than look the part); they flat the same as Veloflex, if not worse, while not offering much road feel/performance.
For my money the best compromise tire is the GP 4 seasons. YMMV
My gripe about Panaracers is that they really don't do anything well (other than look the part); they flat the same as Veloflex, if not worse, while not offering much road feel/performance.
For my money the best compromise tire is the GP 4 seasons. YMMV
Ben
Last edited by 79pmooney; 11-02-15 at 12:53 PM.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,541
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 935 Post(s)
Liked 1,325 Times
in
492 Posts
Compass has very nice tires, but you might find them pricey:
https://www.compasscycle.com/product...ts/tires/700c/
Still, they should tick the other checkboxes: performance and C&V look.
https://www.compasscycle.com/product...ts/tires/700c/
Still, they should tick the other checkboxes: performance and C&V look.
One point made in the OP was that the Paselas "don't seem to roll as nice as the Conti's". Based on Jan Heine's tire testing work that seems to show quantitatively that low pressure wider tires in general roll better than high pressure skinnier tires, I think that the "seem to" in that sentence often has more to do with perception than reality (although I can't really comment on whether the Contis are faster or slower than Paselas since I haven't used Paselas). When I switched to 32 mm Compass tires from my 23/25 mm Contis they certainly "seemed" slower because they were so cushy and comfortable. However, in coast down tests with my usual riding partners I am now actually faster than I used to be. Also, they are much more sure-footed when descending and cornering on roads full of hairpin turns. My point is that we perceive a hard riding tire to be faster, but our perceptions may be wrong.
#32
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,827 Times
in
1,709 Posts
DD
#33
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,630
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times
in
1,579 Posts
Another vote for Compass tires.
One point made in the OP was that the Paselas "don't seem to roll as nice as the Conti's". Based on Jan Heine's tire testing work that seems to show quantitatively that low pressure wider tires in general roll better than high pressure skinnier tires, I think that the "seem to" in that sentence often has more to do with perception than reality (although I can't really comment on whether the Contis are faster or slower than Paselas since I haven't used Paselas). When I switched to 32 mm Compass tires from my 23/25 mm Contis they certainly "seemed" slower because they were so cushy and comfortable. However, in coast down tests with my usual riding partners I am now actually faster than I used to be. Also, they are much more sure-footed when descending and cornering on roads full of hairpin turns. My point is that we perceive a hard riding tire to be faster, but our perceptions may be wrong.
One point made in the OP was that the Paselas "don't seem to roll as nice as the Conti's". Based on Jan Heine's tire testing work that seems to show quantitatively that low pressure wider tires in general roll better than high pressure skinnier tires, I think that the "seem to" in that sentence often has more to do with perception than reality (although I can't really comment on whether the Contis are faster or slower than Paselas since I haven't used Paselas). When I switched to 32 mm Compass tires from my 23/25 mm Contis they certainly "seemed" slower because they were so cushy and comfortable. However, in coast down tests with my usual riding partners I am now actually faster than I used to be. Also, they are much more sure-footed when descending and cornering on roads full of hairpin turns. My point is that we perceive a hard riding tire to be faster, but our perceptions may be wrong.
#34
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,630
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times
in
1,579 Posts
A buddy of mine has those on his 70's Falcon. They look the part and he likes the ride. It's cool that Continental is again making tires in that amber skinwall that used to be their trademark. I'm considering a pair for my go-fast Bianchi when these Paselas wear out.
Or Grand Bois Cerfs, can't decide.
Or Grand Bois Cerfs, can't decide.
#35
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,509
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7354 Post(s)
Liked 2,488 Times
in
1,443 Posts
For what it's worth, Compass tires are made by Panaracer. I do realize that there are different models which probably ride differently.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#36
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,480
Mentioned: 93 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1361 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 424 Times
in
283 Posts
I'm 'flat' out 'tired' of Paselas. Not worth discussing further other than was frustrated.
Have seen the Conti GP Classic at an LBS. Good looking but have not yet tried.
Have seen the Conti GP Classic at an LBS. Good looking but have not yet tried.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 3,333
Bikes: '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '72 Gitane tandem, '72 Raleigh Super Course, '73 Raleigh Gran Sport, '73 Colnago Super, '76 Fiorelli Coppi, '78 Raleigh SBDU Team Pro, '78 Trek 930, '81 Holdsworth Special 650B, '86 Masi GC, ’94 Bridgestone RB-T
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 787 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
282 Posts
Panaracer also makes these Fairweather tires in natural rubber:
Fairweather Traveler Tire, 700x28c, Black - Tires, Tubes & Rim Tape - Components
They ride nice, but I don't have a lot of miles in them yet. I think they are a little lighter than Paselas: 240g for the Fairweather vs. 280g for the Pasela 28 PT folding. Not sure the TPI.
Fairweather Traveler Tire, 700x28c, Black - Tires, Tubes & Rim Tape - Components
They ride nice, but I don't have a lot of miles in them yet. I think they are a little lighter than Paselas: 240g for the Fairweather vs. 280g for the Pasela 28 PT folding. Not sure the TPI.
__________________
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511
Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Paselas are terrible. However, I prefer Panaracer TourGuard Plus over Schwalbe Marathon Plus tires in EVERY size I've ever used (622-38, 622-35, 622-40). My favorite tyres are Contis. Strangely Conti doesn't do a 622-35 like the others for touring tyres. Only 'cross in that size.
Panaracer Tourguard Plus tires are higher quality and have a better ride than the Schwalbe Marathon AND M Plus tires (even comparing belted to non-belted). I still prefer Contis but it's not because of quality or ride. Have Contis on the car.
Paselas have a poor reputation in the tandem community. They really aren't tandem rated though lots of people use them. Very thin sidewall prone to constant posts about sidewall failures. I don't really understand the point of the Pasela other than on paper they are light. Love Panaracer tires just not Paselas, and that's from a devoted Conti guy.
Panaracer Tourguard Plus tires are higher quality and have a better ride than the Schwalbe Marathon AND M Plus tires (even comparing belted to non-belted). I still prefer Contis but it's not because of quality or ride. Have Contis on the car.
Paselas have a poor reputation in the tandem community. They really aren't tandem rated though lots of people use them. Very thin sidewall prone to constant posts about sidewall failures. I don't really understand the point of the Pasela other than on paper they are light. Love Panaracer tires just not Paselas, and that's from a devoted Conti guy.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511
Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Compass had some problems with their specs. They weren't seating properly. May have cleared out all the problem inventory by now.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 257 Times
in
142 Posts
I ordered a set of Soma Supple Vitesse for my Hollands.
Happy to report on these to the board.
In the meantime, I'm sticking with Compass and Veloflex.
Nothing but quality. imho
@op I've tried Panaracer Gravel Kings and I sure like those better than any Pasela I have ridden.
They out handle a lot of straight road tires I have ridden over the years and they seem quite durable.
Just something to think about.
Happy to report on these to the board.
In the meantime, I'm sticking with Compass and Veloflex.
Nothing but quality. imho
@op I've tried Panaracer Gravel Kings and I sure like those better than any Pasela I have ridden.
They out handle a lot of straight road tires I have ridden over the years and they seem quite durable.
Just something to think about.
Last edited by gomango; 11-02-15 at 03:42 PM.
#41
Senior Member
I have a set of Michelin Dynamic Classics, 700c x 23 on my Falcon... not enough miles to make a judgement yet, but they look the part.
Have you considered Gatorskins? They have the tan sidewall kinda and IMO are smooth rolling, if a bit heavy. I'd go one side smaller, as they tend to run larger
than their stated size.
Have you considered Gatorskins? They have the tan sidewall kinda and IMO are smooth rolling, if a bit heavy. I'd go one side smaller, as they tend to run larger
than their stated size.
#43
Senior Member
Someone mentioned them earlier, but anyone have any experience with Clement Strada LGG's? I've been considering a pair, but am interested in how they compare to many of the other options listed in this thread (Paselas, Grand Prix Classics, Veloflex, Vittoria, etc.)
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 3,448
Bikes: are fun!
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 466 Post(s)
Liked 864 Times
in
273 Posts
I'm curious to hear how well the Soma tires work on the road - they're an attractive option on paper. The Conti GP Classics are a good tire (they're on the bike I rode earlier today in fact). I wouldn't rank them with Veloflex in terms of handling/feel, but they're leagues ahead of Pasaelas. I have a set of Paselas on a 27" wheeled bike and would only consider them for that size as options are more limited.
On 23mm rims, one (~2yr old?) Conti Classic measures 28mm, a fresh Classic measures 27.5mm.
Compass tires are great in my experience, though I've only ever run one set in 650b x 38mm, so a bit of an orange when comparing to skinnier 700c apples.
I was able to tear the sidewall on the Conti Classics in some large gravel pretty quickly (within a few hundred feet), but I went into that situation knowing I was pushing it with those tires. Just a word of caution to anyone considering them for use in gravel. They do as well as you could expect for a 25mm in med/fine gravel.
On 23mm rims, one (~2yr old?) Conti Classic measures 28mm, a fresh Classic measures 27.5mm.
Compass tires are great in my experience, though I've only ever run one set in 650b x 38mm, so a bit of an orange when comparing to skinnier 700c apples.
I was able to tear the sidewall on the Conti Classics in some large gravel pretty quickly (within a few hundred feet), but I went into that situation knowing I was pushing it with those tires. Just a word of caution to anyone considering them for use in gravel. They do as well as you could expect for a 25mm in med/fine gravel.
Last edited by Sir_Name; 11-02-15 at 04:59 PM.
#46
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,630
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times
in
1,579 Posts
At least with 650B, the issues were more due to rims than the tires: https://janheine.wordpress.com/2012/...th-deep-wells/
Since that blog post in 2012, Grand Bois has redesigned their rim for better tire seating, and there are new alternatives that work really well.
Unfortunately, several common rims for wider tires, including the Velocity Synergy, several Velo-Orange models, and the no-longer-available Grand Bois, have overly deep wells. This makes mounting tires difficult. The sole advantage is that the tires come off the rim easily.
On their 650B rims, Synergy tried to “fix” the problem of poorly seating tires by increasing the overall rim diameter. In my experience, this has made things worse, because now the hook is in the wrong place. There is nothing to locate the tire: The well still is too deep, so the tire cannot sit on the well bed. And the hook is too high, so the tire cannot sit underneath the hook.
On their 650B rims, Synergy tried to “fix” the problem of poorly seating tires by increasing the overall rim diameter. In my experience, this has made things worse, because now the hook is in the wrong place. There is nothing to locate the tire: The well still is too deep, so the tire cannot sit on the well bed. And the hook is too high, so the tire cannot sit underneath the hook.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hurricane Alley , Florida
Posts: 3,903
Bikes: Treks (USA), Schwinn Paramount, Schwinn letour,Raleigh Team Professional, Gazelle GoldLine Racing, 2 Super Mondias, Carlton Professional.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 78 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times
in
22 Posts
Veloflex master twin pack, even with shipping they're still a great price.
Veloflex Master Folding Twinpack (2), TYRES ROAD/TRI/TRACK FOLDING
Veloflex Master Folding Twinpack (2), TYRES ROAD/TRI/TRACK FOLDING
#48
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,226
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Veloflex Masters in 25 mm are very nice tires. Fast. They are more like a 23mm in size. I just took off the rear with almost 2000 miles on it. No flats. Tons of night riding. I just wish it had more volume.
Compass EL and Challenge PR are the only competitors in a classic tan side walled tire. I prefer Vittoria EVO but also use Continental GP 4000 si suffering the lack of comfort and crappy sidewalls accepting the speed..
Compass EL and Challenge PR are the only competitors in a classic tan side walled tire. I prefer Vittoria EVO but also use Continental GP 4000 si suffering the lack of comfort and crappy sidewalls accepting the speed..
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: STP
Posts: 14,491
Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 257 Times
in
142 Posts
Veloflex master twin pack, even with shipping they're still a great price.
Veloflex Master Folding Twinpack (2), TYRES ROAD/TRI/TRACK FOLDING
Veloflex Master Folding Twinpack (2), TYRES ROAD/TRI/TRACK FOLDING
Great value and performance though.
#50
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 15,944
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times
in
174 Posts
Paselas are terrible. However, I prefer Panaracer TourGuard Plus over Schwalbe Marathon Plus tires in EVERY size I've ever used (622-38, 622-35, 622-40). My favorite tyres are Contis. Strangely Conti doesn't do a 622-35 like the others for touring tyres. Only 'cross in that size.
Panaracer Tourguard Plus tires are higher quality and have a better ride than the Schwalbe Marathon AND M Plus tires (even comparing belted to non-belted). I still prefer Contis but it's not because of quality or ride. Have Contis on the car.
Paselas have a poor reputation in the tandem community. They really aren't tandem rated though lots of people use them. Very thin sidewall prone to constant posts about sidewall failures. I don't really understand the point of the Pasela other than on paper they are light. Love Panaracer tires just not Paselas, and that's from a devoted Conti guy.
Panaracer Tourguard Plus tires are higher quality and have a better ride than the Schwalbe Marathon AND M Plus tires (even comparing belted to non-belted). I still prefer Contis but it's not because of quality or ride. Have Contis on the car.
Paselas have a poor reputation in the tandem community. They really aren't tandem rated though lots of people use them. Very thin sidewall prone to constant posts about sidewall failures. I don't really understand the point of the Pasela other than on paper they are light. Love Panaracer tires just not Paselas, and that's from a devoted Conti guy.
I like the Panaracer T-serv and Ribmos as commuter tires...but the Pasela is crap IME.