25mm & 27mm a little too plush for pavement?
#1
Veteran, Pacifist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,334
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3901 Post(s)
Liked 4,844 Times
in
2,233 Posts
25mm & 27mm a little too plush for pavement?
I bought into the current trend of fatter tires with my last purchase. Veloflex Arenburg (25) & Vlaanderen (27). My first impression is that they change the feel of a lightweight race bike toward too soft on pavement. Think I'll stick with 22/23 on these bikes in the future. Wider tires are for white roads.
edit: More rides needed for a complete/final opinion.
edit: More rides needed for a complete/final opinion.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 02-08-16 at 10:47 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,317
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
313 Posts
I'm totally sold on 23's for nimble handling and acceleration. To me, feel is everything and there is a difference. No 25's for me.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,065
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1217 Post(s)
Liked 187 Times
in
118 Posts
Depends on how nice the roads are and if they're wet.
If I were riding the 13+ foot wide, recently lain roads up in Gwinnett county I'd be more than happy with 23/25s. If I'm down in Atlanta duking it out with SUVs on roads that are barely 9 feet wide dodging potholes and steel grates I'll take 32s and most often 42s.
If I were riding the 13+ foot wide, recently lain roads up in Gwinnett county I'd be more than happy with 23/25s. If I'm down in Atlanta duking it out with SUVs on roads that are barely 9 feet wide dodging potholes and steel grates I'll take 32s and most often 42s.
#4
Senior Member
This is really a ymmv subject. I doubt I will ever buy tires again that are smaller than 25. I find the pressure necessary in a 23 makes the ride harsher than I prefer, with no discernible upside. Mind you, that's discernible by me.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,909
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,933 Times
in
2,558 Posts
The tires themselves have a lot to do with this. If you ride good enough tires, there is no downside to the fatter ones. (Well, OK, a little weight and a little air resistance.) And if you have to corner on steep wet roads that might have gravel, there is a big upside.
Ben
Ben
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
I am not convinced it is only related to tire width. Overall tire construction can impact the ride quality to the point where there is a significant range of performance within a tire width.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 386
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Replying to the question in the thread title:
It all depends on your pavement. There's a big variety between cities, hell, within Los Angeles there's a HUGE difference between PARTS of the city. Where I do my fast training rides of course has nice pavement. Where I ride if I'm commuting or running errands can go from a fresh laid bike lane to "is this cyclocross?"
I think this is more about your definition of "pavement" =)
It all depends on your pavement. There's a big variety between cities, hell, within Los Angeles there's a HUGE difference between PARTS of the city. Where I do my fast training rides of course has nice pavement. Where I ride if I'm commuting or running errands can go from a fresh laid bike lane to "is this cyclocross?"
I think this is more about your definition of "pavement" =)
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I think you may have nicer pavement than we do. I have a buddy who does road races on 27mm tubulars due to the terrible condition of the roads we race on.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,539
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 932 Post(s)
Liked 1,317 Times
in
491 Posts
Definitely skinnier tires "feel" more lively (aka bouncier, skittish, uncomfortable) whereas wider tires are plusher and don't feel as fast. However, based on bike quarterly's testing and on my own experience, the skinnies are slower than the fatties given equivalent construction. Also, there is no doubt whatsoever that the fatties give much more secure cornering. I got sucked into the "skinny tires are fastest" hype for decades, but now I have been completely converted back to more reasonably sized tires. Given that I weigh 185, I will not be running anything less than 25 mm ever again and in general I will stick to 28+ mm.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,065
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1217 Post(s)
Liked 187 Times
in
118 Posts
What size tires have you compared? I've found my 650bx42 set-up to be exactly 0.5 mph slower than 700x28 on the same bike. What I've been wondering is if that's due to the tires or to the significantly wider fenders required?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,593
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 79 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
As a single data point, I will just say that my 28mm Grand Bois Cerfs and 27mm Challenge Paris-Roubaix (which stretch to wider than their listed size) feel every bit as communicative and fast as my 23mm Vittoria Open Corsa SC IIs and Veloflex Masters. Good tires, all of them, and I believe that plus appropriate tire pressure are the key differentiators versus tire width.
#12
Senior Member
I bought into the current trend of fatter tires with my last purchase. Veloflex Arenburg (25) & Vlaanderen (27). My first impression is that they change the feel of a lightweight race bike toward too soft on pavement. Think I'll stick with 22/23 on these bikes in the future. Wider tires are for white roads.
edit: More rides needed for a complete/final opinion.
edit: More rides needed for a complete/final opinion.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,597
Bikes: Too many 3-speeds, Jones Plus LWB
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 265 Times
in
119 Posts
How much weight is on the tire is a big deal. I got tired of the pinch flats that were unavoidable with 23mm on the road. Going to 25mm was not much better. I can imagine someone doing well with them if they weigh maybe 50 pounds less than me. I found that I could go a lot faster on 28mm as I could handle what the road was throwing at me with much greater ease.
#14
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 467
Bikes: 84 Coppi - 94 Hujsak - 82 Colnago Superissimo - 78 Ciöcc - 70's Galmozzi - 73 Lambert - 78 Motobecane Grand Record - 87 Peugeot Triathlon - 66 Peugeot H-40 - 78 Peugeot U08 - 85 Raleigh C-40 - 82 miyata 310 - 82 Univega - 85 Sterling SIS Mixte
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times
in
14 Posts
The tires themselves have a lot to do with this. If you ride good enough tires, there is no downside to the fatter ones. (Well, OK, a little weight and a little air resistance.) And if you have to corner on steep wet roads that might have gravel, there is a big upside.
Ben
Ben
25mm Continental GP4000s II at 100psi - fast and forgiving - my go to.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,160
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3811 Post(s)
Liked 6,717 Times
in
2,614 Posts
I have found dialing in the right psi is key. And it varies from tire to tire, even among those with the same width.
#16
Senior Member
How much weight is on the tire is a big deal. I got tired of the pinch flats that were unavoidable with 23mm on the road. Going to 25mm was not much better. I can imagine someone doing well with them if they weigh maybe 50 pounds less than me. I found that I could go a lot faster on 28mm as I could handle what the road was throwing at me with much greater ease.
I've taken a bike and swapped wheelsets on back-to-back around-the-neighborhood test rides, changing between 23mm and 32mm. The difference in handling was unbelievable.
#17
Senior Member
25s are faster than 23s according the research (the contact patch for 23s and 25s is the same and given that speed has more to do with the shape of the contact patch) but, these findings are based on 'actual' sizes, not what's marked on the sidewall (tubulars are more accurate in this regard). You have to measure tires to know what you're really riding on. My OEM 25s are more like ~27s. I rode 23s for years and thought they were great but it would not surprise to learn that they were actually 25s (especially when riding on wider as opposed to narrower rims).
#19
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,506
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7352 Post(s)
Liked 2,479 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I still prefer 28-32 mm for most kinds of riding. It's largely a matter of taste.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 7,639
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Mentioned: 146 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
31 Posts
With 25 mm I use 90-100 front, 110-120 rear. Lower gives more pinch flats and requires frequent re-inflation. Ride quality is fine on smooth roads. On bad roads, comfort suffers.
#21
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,847
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2298 Post(s)
Liked 2,055 Times
in
1,255 Posts
I like fat tires on fat bikes, skinnys on fast bikes. Pinch flat = low psi (ususally)
#22
Senior Member
25mm tires feel every bit as fast and provide more cornering security for me than 23's do--some of it is psychological, but as mentioned elsewhere, research also supports this. On my modern bike, it's Michelin Pro 4 endurance... But I'm no lightweight, so definitely ymmv.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,435
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5888 Post(s)
Liked 3,472 Times
in
2,079 Posts
YMMV for sure on this issue. I never liked 23c s all that much though. I used to ride 25c a lot; lately I've been riding 28c tires. I think some of it has to do with speed. If going fast, some of the weight will move off your butt and to your hands and feet; going a bit slower a wider tire is better. I don't race anymore and the 28c tires work for me now well.
#25
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4682 Post(s)
Liked 5,803 Times
in
2,286 Posts
From a weight perspective, if you were doing a test from a standing start on a hill, the wheel with higher angular momentum (typically the heavier wheel, if the radii where the same) will take longer to get up to the same speed. If you were testing over a certain distance downhill, it will be faster. In addition, wider tires will be less aerodynamic. On the other hand, at the same speed, the higher angular momentum wheel will coast you up farther on that hill.
On another note, I'll race you up the Iron Horse Trail between North Bend and Cle Elum, WA on your 28's, uphill or down, your choice.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.