New aero brake levers or vintage aero?
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Bikes: 1985 Peugeot PGN-10, a '90's specialized MTB
New aero brake levers or vintage aero?
I'm making the switch from non-aero to aero brake levers. There's vintage dura-ace on ebay or, for about the same price and with brake cables included, I could get something like new shimano L-R400 levers.
I wondered if ergonomically speaking, if the newer ones are more comfortable. I'm not racing so I don't need the latest and greatest type-r superfast levers. I'm looking to just clean up the front and something that's comfortable. I wasn't sure if newer designs had changed so much that new aero are certainly better over vintage aero.
I wondered if ergonomically speaking, if the newer ones are more comfortable. I'm not racing so I don't need the latest and greatest type-r superfast levers. I'm looking to just clean up the front and something that's comfortable. I wasn't sure if newer designs had changed so much that new aero are certainly better over vintage aero.
#2
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,410
Likes: 1,876
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
For me, the best brake handles are the ones which best fit my hands. I tend to favor Weinmanns, DiaCompes, and Shimanos and to avoid Modolos, Campagnolos, and Mafacs, all of which I find difficult to grab quickly and securely for a sudden panic stop. I do appreciate the additional 10% leverage the aero brake handles offer.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,643
Likes: 68
From: Portland OR
Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997
Newer levers tend to have longer, flatter, wider upper surfaces on the hoods. They may be more comfortable to ride on. They may stretch you out a little bit. Some of them look very non-C&V.
#6
The new Tektros are more comfortable for me with a bigger "platform". I tend to ride a lot with my hands on the brakes or bend of the bar.
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1991 GT Karakoram, 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, 1989 Spectrum Titanium,
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1991 GT Karakoram, 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, 1989 Spectrum Titanium,
#7
I would look for good spring action and a quick release. Most good aero levers from mid-to-late 80s should be fine for that.
If you want the latest and greatest, check out TRP RRL SR levers. Very ergonomic and function wonderfully. I think they look really nice, even though they are shaped somewhat differently than vintage levers. TRP is Tektro's high-end brand/branch.
If you want the latest and greatest, check out TRP RRL SR levers. Very ergonomic and function wonderfully. I think they look really nice, even though they are shaped somewhat differently than vintage levers. TRP is Tektro's high-end brand/branch.
#8
Previous posters have already got it: modern levers tend to be slightly wider, making them a tad more comfortable under most riders' palms (note that opinions may vary depending on hand size and riding posture). But between the two OP mentioned there's not much difference, the R400 levers are made on the same pattern as Shimano's older levers, I'm not sure if they're any wider than the average late 80's/early 90's Shimano lever or not. I would advise against picking the old DA levers unless you're matching an old DA group though, not because of how they function/feel, but because of the difficulty of finding matching replacement hoods in the future.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 2
From: Williamsburg, Tennesse.
Bikes: All have flats.
Love the Tektros. The lever curves back considerably, making a nicer reach when on the drops. The only drawback is how deep the bolt is located, so you need a long hex wrench when adjusting them. But they do have a nice big platform.
#10
Senior Member



Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 5,836
Likes: 3,421
From: Los Angeles
Bikes: 82 Medici, 85 Ironman, 2011 Richard Sachs
As mentioned a couple times above, whatever your choose, make sure you can get hoods that fit. I find that my hands will get used to anything -- even hoodless levers.
#12
Banned.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,816
Likes: 29
From: on the beach
Bikes: '73 falcon sr, '76 grand record, '84 davidson
I'm making the switch from non-aero to aero brake levers. There's vintage dura-ace on ebay or, for about the same price and with brake cables included, I could get something like new shimano L-R400 levers. I wondered if ergonomically speaking, if the newer ones are more comfortable. I'm not racing so I don't need the latest and greatest type-r superfast levers. I'm looking to just clean up the front and something that's comfortable. I wasn't sure if newer designs had changed so much that new aero are certainly better over vintage aero.
long story short, i ended up going back to vintage campy non-aeros on two of these conversions (keepers). not only did the aero levers look wholly out of place after i had gathered enough of an eye in experience, but i actually now like the feel of non-aeros much more. it helps to use non-aero hoods that look good and are comfortable. for me, that's dia-compe 204s.
it was an expensive way to learn about levers, but the experience taught me a lot.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 287
From: Magnolia State, 100° with 110% humidity
Bikes: American, Italian, and Japanese.. in no particular order.
I too am fond of the late 80s Shimano 1051 aero levers.
#14
It's MY mountain

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,184
Likes: 4,248
From: Mt.Diablo
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
Another vote for Tektros. I tried the skinny pointy little Shimano things for a while but they just didn't feel good.

Can't believe this is the best photo I have of them:
Can't believe this is the best photo I have of them:
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 28
From: Boston, MA
Bikes: Bianchi Volpe, ANT 3-speed roadster, New Albion Privateer singlespeed, Raleigh One Way singlespeed, Raleigh Professional "retro roadie" rebuild, 198? Fuji(?) franken-5-speed, 1937 Raleigh Tourist, 1952 Raleigh Sports, 1966 Raleigh Sports step-through


Last edited by agmetal; 03-30-16 at 11:36 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 17
From: Upstate NY
Bikes: Bianchi San Mateo and a few others
I put Tektro RL340's on my '72 Peugeot UO-8 and I liked 'em so much I bought them for two other bikes. Really comfy, and it's easy to reach and pull the levers from either the hoods or the drops. The Campy-style quick release button on the lever is a handy touch as well, especially if your calipers don't have a QR.
#17
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Bikes: 1985 Peugeot PGN-10, a '90's specialized MTB
I am liking these. I'm having trouble finding them with brown hoods. I can find the brown hoods sold separately however.
https://www.tektro.com/_english/01_pr...r&sort=1&fid=3
https://www.tektro.com/_english/01_pr...r&sort=1&fid=3
Last edited by Sammie1; 03-30-16 at 05:12 PM.
#18
Junior Member

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
I am having issues - please help...
Have those Tektros on my 84 Guerciotti now and like how I can run the cable and housing through the brake hoods for that sleek look. However I wanted the look with campy so I bought campy "victory" levers from (circa mid 80's) and they don't have the hole in the back of housing. I don't really want to have the "loop" look..
Please help..
Have those Tektros on my 84 Guerciotti now and like how I can run the cable and housing through the brake hoods for that sleek look. However I wanted the look with campy so I bought campy "victory" levers from (circa mid 80's) and they don't have the hole in the back of housing. I don't really want to have the "loop" look..
Please help..
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 762
Likes: 56
I am having issues - please help...
Have those Tektros on my 84 Guerciotti now and like how I can run the cable and housing through the brake hoods for that sleek look. However I wanted the look with campy so I bought campy "victory" levers from (circa mid 80's) and they don't have the hole in the back of housing. I don't really want to have the "loop" look..
Please help..
Have those Tektros on my 84 Guerciotti now and like how I can run the cable and housing through the brake hoods for that sleek look. However I wanted the look with campy so I bought campy "victory" levers from (circa mid 80's) and they don't have the hole in the back of housing. I don't really want to have the "loop" look..
Please help..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pukeskywalker
Classic & Vintage
18
05-13-16 04:25 PM
jambon
Classic & Vintage
8
01-24-15 09:15 AM






