Classic Bike Identification Chart
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 77
Bikes: '16 Fuji Tread 1.7, '96 Cannondale R400, '88 Miyata 112
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Classic Bike Identification Chart
I am just beginning to look at classic bikes. I've learned a couple of brand names, but the difference between a desirable frame and entry-level baffles me. I really wish someone would make a chart like this for classic bikes:

#2
Senior Member
Maybe not a chart, but randyjawa (who posts here frequently) built and catalogued a website for your exact purpose: FREE SITE 1
The site has a whole resource on what to look for when trying to find quality vs. garbage.
My apologies in advance for erasing the rest of your free time for the weekend.
The site has a whole resource on what to look for when trying to find quality vs. garbage.
My apologies in advance for erasing the rest of your free time for the weekend.
#3
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
Posts: 2,717
Bikes: '74 Raleigh International utility; '98 Moser Forma road; '92 Viner Pro CX upright
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 939 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Italy actually made some pretty good airplanes.

did you know they still wear feathered helmets today? (rhetorical question)
did you know they still wear feathered helmets today? (rhetorical question)

Last edited by bulldog1935; 12-03-16 at 04:04 PM.
#4
Youngman Grand
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,129
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 118 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2052 Post(s)
Liked 1,363 Times
in
887 Posts
For every airplane model there's likely 1000 bikes so your chart will be a little unwieldy. Quality begins in the frame details so start studying, taking pics and use search engines to do your research. It's often said it takes 10,000 hours to become an expert or truly adept at any discipline so start now!
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Prior Lake
Posts: 637
Bikes: 1989 Tommasini Super Prestige, 1985 Chris Kvale, 1977 Colnago Super, 1992 Serotta Colorado, 1984 Schwinn Cimarron
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
15 Posts
I have a couple of family members on my side and the gal's side that do quite a bit of garage sale-ing(?).
I've made them a quick guide of things to look for when looking at a vintage road bike. Side by side pictures of stamped/forged dropouts, 1-piece/3-piece crank, shifter locations, etc. If something hits most or all of the boxes, text me.
I've made them a quick guide of things to look for when looking at a vintage road bike. Side by side pictures of stamped/forged dropouts, 1-piece/3-piece crank, shifter locations, etc. If something hits most or all of the boxes, text me.
Likes For toavii:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 1,684
Bikes: 1980 Koga-Miyata Gentsluxe-S, 1998 Eddy Merckx Corsa 01, 1983 Tommasini Racing, 2012 Gulf Western CAAD10, 1980 Univega Gran Premio
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 600 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Signs of vintage entry level bikes: turkey levers (extensions off the normal brake levers), stem shifters, big metal or plastic dork disks (between freewheel and spokes on rear wheel), protective rim outside of big chain ring. Lots of exceptions, and those things can be removed fairly easily, but usually original owners, and lazy bike flippers, leave those things alone.
If it has a sticker on the seat tube (usual location) that states the tubing type (531, Columbus, Champion, etc), then that's a good sign. The list of quality tubesets is much shorter than the list of quality bike models.
The components are a whole additional huge topic. Generally Campagnolo was on the better bikes, but again that stuff can be stripped off, so a great frame may end up with lesser components.
It's a deep subject. Probably the quickest way to learn is post on the appraisals C&V forum whatever cool bikes you see on Craigslist, and read all the threads you see like that. But do a quick search here first, you'll start figuring out a lot of it on your own.
Save
#11
Senior Member
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Soviet of Oregon or the NW Florida Redoubt
Posts: 5,180
Bikes: Still have a few left!
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 417 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
160 Posts
Just look for these "Axle Adjusting Screws" on the rear drop outs. Almost always found on a quality frame, but I did once see them on a Sekai Hi Ten steel frame, so not a foolproof guide. Don
Last edited by ollo_ollo; 12-03-16 at 08:08 PM. Reason: missing "
#13
Senior Member
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,729
Mentioned: 604 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4476 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2,544 Times
in
1,617 Posts
The friend vs. foe airchaft charts were intended to train ground and air crews in quick and proper identification of aircraft types. The charts give no indication of the abilities of the aircraft which were established in combat situations and became a matter of reputation. As such, the charts provide no more information than knowing the brand and model of a bicycle.
#17
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,140
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1225 Post(s)
Liked 227 Times
in
131 Posts
Here's some quick identifiers to let you know it's probably something of decent quality...
Unscientific - but lift it up. Lighter is usually better.
Forged drop outs are a pretty good indicator.
The lugs and details.
The parts on the bike can be a good indicator - learn your levels of Shimano, campagnolo, etc.
Tubing says a lot. Learn your Reynolds, Columbus, tange and Ishiwata stickers...most 531 is quality, but there's a big difference between a Raleigh supercourse and an Ephgrave.
Generally (not always) a kick stand, suicide levers, and turkey stems come on lower end bikes.
Brand/model preferences are often biases from nostalgia, or they can be based on experience. Some brands/models are more prestigious than others, but it's always debateable. You have folks with bikes that are distinctly less desireable who love them...price/demand isn't always quality. We all have biases, and there are a LOT of bikes out there that may be good for different people. I have bikes I like.
Unscientific - but lift it up. Lighter is usually better.
Forged drop outs are a pretty good indicator.
The lugs and details.
The parts on the bike can be a good indicator - learn your levels of Shimano, campagnolo, etc.
Tubing says a lot. Learn your Reynolds, Columbus, tange and Ishiwata stickers...most 531 is quality, but there's a big difference between a Raleigh supercourse and an Ephgrave.
Generally (not always) a kick stand, suicide levers, and turkey stems come on lower end bikes.
Brand/model preferences are often biases from nostalgia, or they can be based on experience. Some brands/models are more prestigious than others, but it's always debateable. You have folks with bikes that are distinctly less desireable who love them...price/demand isn't always quality. We all have biases, and there are a LOT of bikes out there that may be good for different people. I have bikes I like.
#18
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: downtown Bulverde, Texas
Posts: 2,717
Bikes: '74 Raleigh International utility; '98 Moser Forma road; '92 Viner Pro CX upright
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 939 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Actually forged dropouts are good starting point
not that every bike with stamped dropouts is a dog, either - it's just usually the first step up in quality.
Choice of lugs picked for the frame is a little more subtle.
The choice of steel tubing affects the weight and performance of the frame. There's straight gage and butted (thicker at the joined ends than in the center of the tube length), and grades of butted (double, triple, quad). If you're looking for a lightweight quality bike, you're looking for butted tubing.
Some like Tange made it very obvious by giving you 5 thickness grades and numbering them. Others like Columbus can be a little strange with names that changed every 4 or 5 years.
A sport-touring bike built with the heavy gage tubing is going to on the low-cost end, but a touring bike with one of heavier butted grades was built that way to haul a substantial load. (Think of it as a Lancaster and you're the 4 Rolls Merlins)
Picking the frame probably depends on what you want to do with it - lightweight road bike (classic racer) vs. utility bike and load hauler - there are geometric differences in the frame and fork that makes these two types of frames handle differently, and a sport-touring bike tends to fall in between the two geometric extremes, may be light weight and sporty and good at handling a front load. Within any of these styles of bikes, there are quality levels and extremes.
Again, I'm going to throw out my old Raleigh Grand Prix that I kept rebuilding for 40 years as a well-designed economical frame.
Fast and sporty, stable with a load, certainly heavy.
But even today people hunt these bikes out to build them into tour bikes (especially tall people because of the sizes available).
Yes, stamped dropouts and straight-gage steel, but Carlton geometry and a stable low-trail fork.
Though the fit is very similar, it's not going to compare to the turn-in quickness and acceleration of a good Italian road bike, but you'd be hard pressed to find a better load-hauling utility bike. And still, this is a fast bike - it's just heavy.
If your goal is not bulletproof load hauler, you should be looking at lighter, sportier frames.
not that every bike with stamped dropouts is a dog, either - it's just usually the first step up in quality.
Choice of lugs picked for the frame is a little more subtle.
The choice of steel tubing affects the weight and performance of the frame. There's straight gage and butted (thicker at the joined ends than in the center of the tube length), and grades of butted (double, triple, quad). If you're looking for a lightweight quality bike, you're looking for butted tubing.
Some like Tange made it very obvious by giving you 5 thickness grades and numbering them. Others like Columbus can be a little strange with names that changed every 4 or 5 years.
A sport-touring bike built with the heavy gage tubing is going to on the low-cost end, but a touring bike with one of heavier butted grades was built that way to haul a substantial load. (Think of it as a Lancaster and you're the 4 Rolls Merlins)
Again, I'm going to throw out my old Raleigh Grand Prix that I kept rebuilding for 40 years as a well-designed economical frame.
Fast and sporty, stable with a load, certainly heavy.
But even today people hunt these bikes out to build them into tour bikes (especially tall people because of the sizes available).
Yes, stamped dropouts and straight-gage steel, but Carlton geometry and a stable low-trail fork.
Though the fit is very similar, it's not going to compare to the turn-in quickness and acceleration of a good Italian road bike, but you'd be hard pressed to find a better load-hauling utility bike. And still, this is a fast bike - it's just heavy.
If your goal is not bulletproof load hauler, you should be looking at lighter, sportier frames.

Last edited by bulldog1935; 12-03-16 at 10:56 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,520
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1815 Post(s)
Liked 564 Times
in
385 Posts
Nice job with the painting some of us can barely draw stick people.
Last edited by Wileyone; 12-04-16 at 08:12 AM.
#20
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,005
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1164 Post(s)
Liked 704 Times
in
495 Posts
No boat anchors, but I have an otherwise full gamut, from a humble, very common, basic entry level frame of ordinary carbon steel (Peugeot UO-8) to a rare and highly collectible frame made with double-butted Reynolds 531 (Capo Sieger). I find that riding pleasure and overall utility depend more on frame geometry than anything else, and every bike in my stable fills a valuable niche for me. Above all else, make sure whatever you buy fits you properly, or can be made to with judicious adjustment of saddle position and stem reach.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#21
Senior Member
A chart, that's pretty simple. 
Italian bikes.

French bikes.

English bikes.

Belgian bikes.

Spanish bikes.

American bikes.

Japanese bikes.

Rest of the world bikes.

Italian bikes.

French bikes.

English bikes.

Belgian bikes.

Spanish bikes.

American bikes.

Japanese bikes.

Rest of the world bikes.

#22
Standard Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 2,972
Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 774 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
47 Posts
Whatever works. Don't believe the nay-sayers. Take it for a ride and see how you like it.
Last edited by 1989Pre; 05-05-18 at 06:09 PM.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,729
Mentioned: 604 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4476 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2,544 Times
in
1,617 Posts
Speaking of the Soviets, I see no mention of the Yakolev Yak-3, which was arguably the best dogfighter of WWII. Their kill ratio was so impressive that the Luftwaffe issued orders to avoid combat with them at altitudes below 5000m. The Free French squadrons operating in Russia reportedly turned down Spitfires and Mustangs in favour of the Yak-3.