Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Effect of lessening the lower headset stack height?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Effect of lessening the lower headset stack height?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-17 | 09:00 PM
  #26  
Thread Starter
Full Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 484
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by SJX426
I never considered that there would be 7mm of difference between lower stack of HS's. My expectation for C&V HS (non integrated or hidden) would be no more than 3mm. Having said that, I really don't know what the range of differences are.
Threaded headset for 1981= mostly in the high 30s in millimeters. My Galli is 19mm on the lower portion.
Threaded headset with the lowest stack height now=? I see some claims of a 12 mm lower stack height, but have not verified.

Last edited by avhed; 01-10-17 at 09:14 PM.
avhed is offline  
Reply
Old 01-10-17 | 10:42 PM
  #27  
drewellison's Avatar
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 32
From: Everett, Wa.

Bikes: Cinelli Nuovo SuperCorsa, Cinelli SuperStar, Raseza, Bike Friday, Litespeed Classic, Fondriest X-Status, Trek Checkpoint ALR

Originally Posted by avhed
How far from horizontal is your top tube now?
It was on a bike with a sloping top tube, so it's a little less sloping now. To tell you the truth, I'm not sure I could tell the difference by looking. But if the TT were horizontal, I could imagine you'd notice a visual difference.

My thought is that the fork I took off was too tall to begin with. It is an Italian steel frame which had an American carbon fork. In researching a-c lengths, it seemed that Italian a-c lengths were shorter than most American made forks or at least the one which was on there, so that affirmed my thought that the frame was built with the intention of a shorter fork.
drewellison is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-17 | 11:29 AM
  #28  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,171
Likes: 6,396
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by drewellison
But if the TT were horizontal, I could imagine you'd notice a visual difference.
I very much doubt most people can detect a 0.4º change in angle! This is whether the original angle was horizontal or not. It's a tiny amount.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ajerichos
Bicycle Mechanics
10
12-31-18 07:41 AM
jambon
Bicycle Mechanics
3
10-04-14 12:46 PM
guadzilla
Road Cycling
0
02-20-11 05:46 AM
scionsound5
Bicycle Mechanics
1
03-25-10 02:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.