Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Tips for getting a front rando rack level?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Tips for getting a front rando rack level?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-17 | 06:02 AM
  #1  
Scottybigs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 268
Likes: 8
From: Toronto

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur SP | Sekine SHS-271 | Wabi Special

Tips for getting a front rando rack level?

My winter project has been these awesome '83 Schwinn Voyageur, and I recently installed a Velo Orange Pass Hunter front rack onto it (the one with the integrated decaleur). Since installing new Shimano CX70 cantilever brakes on it, though, the rack now sits noticeably un-level.

I tried using a spacer and a brake bracket on the front of the fork, which brought it down a little bit--but I can't add any more because then I won't have enough thread off the back of the fork to mount the fender.

So am I doomed to have a rack that's forever angled slightly up? Am I a product of vintage narrow cantilever posts and a modern production rack? If you've solved this problem before, I'm all ears!



Scottybigs is offline  
Reply
Old 03-25-17 | 06:29 AM
  #2  
Grand Bois's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,392
Likes: 40
From: Pinole, CA, USA
That's not a rack, it's a bag support and that's how it is designed to fit. The bag should lean back. Your cables may interfere.
Grand Bois is offline  
Reply
Old 03-25-17 | 06:43 AM
  #3  
Scottybigs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 268
Likes: 8
From: Toronto

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur SP | Sekine SHS-271 | Wabi Special

...I mean, you're not wrong. VO calls it a rack, Nitto calls their's a rack, Compass refers to their's as a rack too...but they'd be better off calling it bag support to get it right, I guess.

The cables bend easily and smoothly beneath the bag support when the bag is mounted, so no harm there.

Full disclosure: my plight is not a matter of function, and is strictly a matter of aesthetic.
Scottybigs is offline  
Reply
Old 03-25-17 | 07:11 AM
  #4  
The Golden Boy's Avatar
Extraordinary Magnitude
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,081
Likes: 2,135
From: Waukesha WI

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

I was going to say "mount to the lower braze on on the fork end instead of the top one."

But, never mind.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-26-17 | 08:04 AM
  #5  
drewellison's Avatar
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 32
From: Everett, Wa.

Bikes: Cinelli Nuovo SuperCorsa, Cinelli SuperStar, Raseza, Bike Friday, Litespeed Classic, Fondriest X-Status, Trek Checkpoint ALR

Move washers

You could move that large rear concave washer from the rear to the front. Then you'd probably have to trim the top end of the fender bracket to get it to fit underneath the headset. It's not ideal, but it might be a solution.

Or just ride with your bag on all the time and you won't notice the angle. Or get help with your OCD.
drewellison is offline  
Reply
Old 03-26-17 | 09:22 AM
  #6  
The Golden Boy's Avatar
Extraordinary Magnitude
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 14,081
Likes: 2,135
From: Waukesha WI

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Originally Posted by Scottybigs


So am I doomed to have a rack that's forever angled slightly up? Am I a product of vintage narrow cantilever posts and a modern production rack?



After a bit of thinking and looking at the pix... I think it's a result of the cantilever bosses being placed 4mm higher than the rack was designed for.

The difference between the a 27" 630 and a 700c 622 rim.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-26-17 | 09:33 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 6,280
Likes: 611
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

I agree with previous poster. You can get away without the concave washer in the back, especially since this is a rack and not a brake. Another possibility is to use a fork crown daruma instead of the rack bolt to mount the fender. That will only gain you a little space but it's something. Additional advantage is that it looks neater and it's a little easier to get the fenders on and off for sunny days if you ever need to do that.

Lastly, I'd guess that those racks are made from 304 or similar steel, which is fairly ductile. It wouldn't bug me to bend that strut a little bit if needed. However, no harm in a slight back tilt, as others have said. It's really pretty much level enough right now.

Last edited by Salamandrine; 03-26-17 at 09:37 AM.
Salamandrine is offline  
Reply
Old 03-26-17 | 02:49 PM
  #8  
Scottybigs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 268
Likes: 8
From: Toronto

Bikes: Schwinn Voyageur SP | Sekine SHS-271 | Wabi Special

Originally Posted by The Golden Boy
After a bit of thinking and looking at the pix... I think it's a result of the cantilever bosses being placed 4mm higher than the rack was designed for.

The difference between the a 27" 630 and a 700c 622 rim.
Yep, that definitely explains the angle, as the frame was designed for 27 1-1/4 wheels. That, combined with squeezing the rack arms inwards (raising the platform higher) to reach the narrow canti bosses, is likely what's driving it upwards.

re: using a daruma bolt: the trouble with that setup is that you lose quite a bit of tire clearance beneath the fork crown vs. using the brake bolt tab. I agree though that it's a superior system, so I'll try mounting 35c tires (currently have 32c), check the clearance, and see if it's possible to go that route. That would allow me to add more spacers to the rack bolt on the front of the fork, and get it level.

re: trimming tab to clear headset: I've got it folded back now, but ya could try cutting the top off it, especially if the daruma bolt setup doesn't allow enough tire clearance.

re: bending the bolt a bit: that may be my last resort. It's stainless steel, which can handle a bit of shaping. I know people bend Nitto racks to fit, although I'll wager those are better quality material.

re: my OCD--let's be honest, if you're regularly posting in the C&V section of BikeForums, chances are you've got a bit of OCD! But ya, once the bag is mounted you really can't notice it.

Thanks everyone, I've got a few options to consider.
Scottybigs is offline  
Reply
Old 03-26-17 | 03:27 PM
  #9  
gugie's Avatar
Bike Butcher of Portland
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 12,447
Likes: 7,981
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: It's complicated.

Ideally your rack should be level, and attach to the front fender.

From my friends at Norther Cycle:


The backstop (or "tombstone") is where you slide your handlebar bag over, and is typically the same angle as your head tube (~73 degrees) from horizontal.

The problem is that none of the off-the-shelf bikes fit on any bikes to make the above happen. When you see those two conditions met, it's almost always a custom rack. I've modified VO racks a few times by cutting off the centerbolt portion and rebrazing a new piece in, but it still required some long spacers to connect to the fender.

On the other hand, it's not a big deal using it just like you have it.

Re: daruma bolts-Yeah, not a great fan. A better alternative is to have a bit brazed onto the fork crown to directly attach the fender by feeding a bolt from under the fender.

OCD? I think you're right, most of us are here to some degree or another! Especially those of us with several bikes, when you can only ride one at a time!
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Reply
Old 03-26-17 | 04:10 PM
  #10  
USAZorro's Avatar
Seņor Member
Titanium Club Membership
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18,473
Likes: 1,557
From: Hardy, VA

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

I have to laugh. Several bikes ago, I bought a V.O. decaleur without reading carefully enough. I mean, I really screwed up and ordered one meant for 26" wheels and cantilever brake mounts when I wanted a rack for a bike with 700c wheels and road brakes. Rather than try to send it back, I held onto it until I had a project for it. I was excited to put it on my Giant Iguana conversion, but it was off a little too far for me to feel comfortable muscling it into place. Fortunately, Mark Ball (at my LBS) got a fit that works with it. It has a slight angle, but it's close enough.

The point? Sorta what gugie said. These are manufacture using a bunch of presumptions about bike geometry, and if yours doesn't exactly match theirs, some creativity is necessary.

Observation - my OCD is different from the OPs. The angle of the flat of the decaleur doesn't bother me a bit. The curve of the attachment near the fork on the other hand... (hope I didn't set off fresh discontent)
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline  
Reply
Old 03-26-17 | 04:44 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 6,280
Likes: 611
From: Los Angeles

Bikes: 78 Masi Criterium, 68 PX10, 2016 Mercian King of Mercia, Rivendell Clem Smith Jr

It's true a daruma eats up clearance. I just mention it because it is an option. I've got one on my PX10 and the clearance is pretty tight, though it does work. Practically speaking I guesstimate it would limit you to ~28c tires, 32 if you push it. I think I could pick up another 2-3mm by grinding the end and using a flatter nut and loctite instead of a nylock.

A threaded boss under the fork crown is really the best way, but of course it will screw up your paint. Another way would be to countersink your fork crown as if for recessed nut brakes, and make or acquire an L bracket that clears your headset. That would give you plenty of room to space out the front.
Salamandrine is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
unterhausen
Framebuilders
12
08-24-18 02:58 PM
BillP
Commuting
8
07-07-11 09:15 AM
Road Fan
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
7
04-06-11 08:26 AM
madscot13
Touring
30
11-22-10 03:39 PM
meyers66
Touring
0
09-30-10 02:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.