sizing for old flat bar bikes
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 61
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
sizing for old flat bar bikes
Hey so with old steel bikes that predate the mtb but are flat bars do I use mtb sizing or road?
#2
Senior Member
Are you referring to the hybrids that first cam out?
My take... I can ride an 18-20" hybrid, MTB but have to have a 21-23" road bike.
Which bike are you looking at?
My take... I can ride an 18-20" hybrid, MTB but have to have a 21-23" road bike.
Which bike are you looking at?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 705
Bikes: 1974 Copper Raleigh International, 1975 Olive Green Raleigh Grand Prix, 1974 Raleigh Europa Custom
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 104 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
If it's an old steel bike 80's or earlier, I'd use road sizing.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,089
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4206 Post(s)
Liked 3,870 Times
in
2,314 Posts
I don't think the Op's question has a real answer. Or one which others can answer. Handle bar shape and width are like saddles or shoes a personal issue.
Sure one can make some kind of associative argument for this or that based on era "standards" but these don't mean anything to a non era body (and that is a bit of a tongue in cheek...) Andy
Sure one can make some kind of associative argument for this or that based on era "standards" but these don't mean anything to a non era body (and that is a bit of a tongue in cheek...) Andy
#5
Bicyclerider4life
As long as you have at least an inch of clearance between the top bar and the family jewels ...
#6
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
If you mean horizontal top tube mountain bikes, yup, pretty much, sorta like road bike sizing. At least in crotchal clearance.
Last year I snagged an early '90s rigid mountain bike, horizontal top tube, 58cm frame. Univega Via Carisma, pretty much their early concept of a hybrid, minus the serious off-pavement wheels and stuff they put on their Alpina with pretty much the same frame. Technically my size, but if I'd intended to do any serious single track or downhill, well... first of all, I wouldn't because I'm too old and haz no skilz. But a 56, maybe even a 54, would have been better for that, mostly to protect to boys in the event of unplanned forward dismount.
The top tube is probably a bit longer than a typical 58cm road bike frame of that era. Combined with the original flat bar it was darned uncomfortable for me, at least last year when I was still trying to get back into shape. Hurt my neck trying to ride more than a few miles.
I swapped the 2" riser bar from another bike, which put the height and reach right where I needed for my rides on pavement, gravel, etc. It's basically like a current model sporty hybrid -- feels pretty much like a flat bar Trek 8.something FX I test rode last year.
I've considered putting on some lower all purpose drop bars, but I'd probably need to replace the stem as well. We'll see. A couple of riding buddies like the mustache bars they put on their rigid mountain bikes for gravel rides. Gets them a bit lower when needed, with enough flare in the drops to retain plenty of room for manuvering.
Last year I snagged an early '90s rigid mountain bike, horizontal top tube, 58cm frame. Univega Via Carisma, pretty much their early concept of a hybrid, minus the serious off-pavement wheels and stuff they put on their Alpina with pretty much the same frame. Technically my size, but if I'd intended to do any serious single track or downhill, well... first of all, I wouldn't because I'm too old and haz no skilz. But a 56, maybe even a 54, would have been better for that, mostly to protect to boys in the event of unplanned forward dismount.
The top tube is probably a bit longer than a typical 58cm road bike frame of that era. Combined with the original flat bar it was darned uncomfortable for me, at least last year when I was still trying to get back into shape. Hurt my neck trying to ride more than a few miles.
I swapped the 2" riser bar from another bike, which put the height and reach right where I needed for my rides on pavement, gravel, etc. It's basically like a current model sporty hybrid -- feels pretty much like a flat bar Trek 8.something FX I test rode last year.
I've considered putting on some lower all purpose drop bars, but I'd probably need to replace the stem as well. We'll see. A couple of riding buddies like the mustache bars they put on their rigid mountain bikes for gravel rides. Gets them a bit lower when needed, with enough flare in the drops to retain plenty of room for manuvering.
#7
Senior Member
I've found that the first most important measurement for me is the height of the crank. Recently sold an extremely nice mountain bike with the same size frame as my road bike, but the mountain bike crank was almost 2 inches higher.
Impossible for me to get proper leg extension and still mount. it would have caused me great pain to stop without swinging one leg over the top tube and "jumping" off the bike.
Impossible for me to get proper leg extension and still mount. it would have caused me great pain to stop without swinging one leg over the top tube and "jumping" off the bike.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,089
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4206 Post(s)
Liked 3,870 Times
in
2,314 Posts
Well I see that I assumed the OP was asking about fat bars as in "handle bars". Guess I never heard the "flat bars" reference applied to frame tubes. Andy
#9
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
I'm with you, Andy! And since OP has not clarified, I'm staying with you.
As far as handlebar diameters go, there are two places to measure, namely the clamp and the bar itself.
The bar itself generally has one of two diameters, best considered as inches: 7/8" (22.2 mm) for flat or upright (including steel drop bars), 15/16" (23.8 mm) for aluminum drop bars. The metric (French) equivalents are 22mm and 24 mm. The reason for this is mostly historical.
As far as handlebar diameters go, there are two places to measure, namely the clamp and the bar itself.
The bar itself generally has one of two diameters, best considered as inches: 7/8" (22.2 mm) for flat or upright (including steel drop bars), 15/16" (23.8 mm) for aluminum drop bars. The metric (French) equivalents are 22mm and 24 mm. The reason for this is mostly historical.
#10
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,647
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,703 Times
in
937 Posts
I've found that the first most important measurement for me is the height of the crank. Recently sold an extremely nice mountain bike with the same size frame as my road bike, but the mountain bike crank was almost 2 inches higher.
Impossible for me to get proper leg extension and still mount. it would have caused me great pain to stop without swinging one leg over the top tube and "jumping" off the bike.
Impossible for me to get proper leg extension and still mount. it would have caused me great pain to stop without swinging one leg over the top tube and "jumping" off the bike.
The length of the seat tube is dependent on the height of the bottom bracket. Which is why a 20" bike can be really tiny or really huge.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#12
bicyclatte!
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 501
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yeah, this is along the lines of what I was going to say. As long as the frame isn't too large to be safe, the next thing I'd want to check is the top tube length for comparison against my desired reach to the bars.
__________________
If someone can pour a Guinness with a cycle instead of a shamrock on top, I'll update my profile pic.
If someone can pour a Guinness with a cycle instead of a shamrock on top, I'll update my profile pic.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
estasnyc
Classic & Vintage
32
09-24-19 12:18 AM
9speed123
General Cycling Discussion
22
06-03-18 06:10 PM