Flange Grandi or Flange Piccole?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,710
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 513 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3171 Post(s)
Liked 3,671 Times
in
1,379 Posts
Flange Grandi or Flange Piccole?
I'm building a new set of wheels for my 1973 DeRosa. I bought some NOS Campagnolo Epsilon tubular rims (yes, I know, they're too new). Now I just need to decide what hubs to pair them with. I've got a set of low flange NR hubs in great condition that I could use. I also have a high flange NR front hub and I could probably find a rear to match it. So I'm seeking opinions.
Which would you use and how strong would your preference be?
Which would you use and how strong would your preference be?
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#2
Cat 6
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountain Brook, AL
Posts: 7,509
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 498 Post(s)
Liked 170 Times
in
112 Posts
I'd build them to match the rims, ie Piccole.
That way when you decide to go period correct on the wheelset (rims included), you'll still have this complete wheelset to use on another frame.
[I kind of made the same decision on my '74 Italvega]
That way when you decide to go period correct on the wheelset (rims included), you'll still have this complete wheelset to use on another frame.
[I kind of made the same decision on my '74 Italvega]
__________________
72 Frejus (for sale), Holdsworth Record (for sale) & special CNC / 74 Italvega NR (for sale) / c80 ?French? / 82 Raleigh Intl MkII (for sale)/ 83 Trek 620 (for sale)/ 84 Bruce Gordon Chinook (for sale)/ 85 Ron Cooper / 87 Centurion IM MV (for sale) / 03 Casati Dardo / 08 BF IRO / 09 Dogma FPX / 10 Vassago Fisticuff
72 Frejus (for sale), Holdsworth Record (for sale) & special CNC / 74 Italvega NR (for sale) / c80 ?French? / 82 Raleigh Intl MkII (for sale)/ 83 Trek 620 (for sale)/ 84 Bruce Gordon Chinook (for sale)/ 85 Ron Cooper / 87 Centurion IM MV (for sale) / 03 Casati Dardo / 08 BF IRO / 09 Dogma FPX / 10 Vassago Fisticuff
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,710
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 513 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3171 Post(s)
Liked 3,671 Times
in
1,379 Posts
That's an interesting thought on keeping the rims and hubs period-matched.
This bike is giving me all kinds of things to think about in terms of period-correctness versus my other matchy-matchy preferences. I've got a set of wheels with red label Fiamme rims that I think may be period correct for the frame, but their laced to Gipiemme hubs. The Gipiemme hubs look good and I'm sure they'd be functionally satisfactory, but I really wanted to move everything to Campy. The rims I bought are from the mid-80's but they've got an orange stripe that matches the paint on the bike perfectly.
I kind of feel like with this bike getting things period correct holds a bit more weight than usual (though for me "usual" is "almost none"). On the other hand, rims are a consumable, right? Decisions, decisions....
This bike is giving me all kinds of things to think about in terms of period-correctness versus my other matchy-matchy preferences. I've got a set of wheels with red label Fiamme rims that I think may be period correct for the frame, but their laced to Gipiemme hubs. The Gipiemme hubs look good and I'm sure they'd be functionally satisfactory, but I really wanted to move everything to Campy. The rims I bought are from the mid-80's but they've got an orange stripe that matches the paint on the bike perfectly.
I kind of feel like with this bike getting things period correct holds a bit more weight than usual (though for me "usual" is "almost none"). On the other hand, rims are a consumable, right? Decisions, decisions....
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#4
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,508
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1283 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4591 Post(s)
Liked 5,473 Times
in
2,190 Posts
Picolle - stylistic match.
As far as strength between the two goes, there are some who would argue vehemently for one vs the other. If there is a difference, it's so minor compared to so many other things as to be akin to religious dogma.
As far as strength between the two goes, there are some who would argue vehemently for one vs the other. If there is a difference, it's so minor compared to so many other things as to be akin to religious dogma.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#5
vintage motor
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tepic, Nayarit, Mexico
Posts: 1,567
Bikes: 48 Automoto, 49 Stallard, 50 Rotrax, 62 Jack Taylor, 67 Atala, 68 Lejeune, 72-74-75 Motobecanes, 73 RIH, 71 Zieleman, 74 Raleigh, 78 Windsor, 83 Messina (Villata), 84 Brazzo (Losa), 85 Davidson, 90 Diamondback, 92 Kestrel
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 88 Times
in
68 Posts
Rims are a consumable but they're also hi-viz, so I always try to find something that matches visually even if it's not a vintage part.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,710
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 513 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3171 Post(s)
Liked 3,671 Times
in
1,379 Posts
I was really expecting a lot more support for the high flange hubs. Going with the low flange certainly would be the easier option. Hmmm....
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#7
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,734
Mentioned: 228 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2100 Post(s)
Liked 3,181 Times
in
1,132 Posts
Go with the setup that will make you want to ride them. Couple of years ago I built up a set of high flange hubs to new Pacenti wide polished box section rims. Great wheels. They have been run extensively on pavement as well as at L'Eroica CA and Cino Heroica. Nobody has ever mentioned the age disparity between the hubs and rims, in fact they'll gotten a lot of compliments.
I really dig the looks of the high flange hubs but wanted a super strong versatile freewheel wheelset that could take anything from 25's to 32's.
I really dig the looks of the high flange hubs but wanted a super strong versatile freewheel wheelset that could take anything from 25's to 32's.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever
Posts: 16,755
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 555 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 130 Times
in
76 Posts
But I have a set of low flange too, laced to Red Labels, and they're fine wheels.
How's that for non-commital? I sound like a politician....
#10
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,848
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 578 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1904 Post(s)
Liked 561 Times
in
332 Posts
#11
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,451
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
232 Posts

I'd have to see the bike and the hubs and rims. But I bet if you build them well strength won't be an issue.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,639
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1360 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,703 Times
in
919 Posts
From a functional point of view, it really does not matter all that much, in my opinion. But I do love the look of high flange hubs and, given the choice, would go high flange every time, as is the case on most of my vintage steeds, including my PX10E...

__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,794
Mentioned: 127 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3235 Post(s)
Liked 2,499 Times
in
1,782 Posts
The Pro Peloton that year was mainly low flange.
It is a Pro Bike, low flange.
On bikes with half chrome forks and stays...High Flange. Styling.
It is a Pro Bike, low flange.
On bikes with half chrome forks and stays...High Flange. Styling.
#14
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,451
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
232 Posts
When I bought my first lightweight bike way back in the tail end of last millennium, before the 3/4ths point of last century, the affordable Peugeots were the UO-8 and the even more affordable AO-8. Their catalogs and every published thing I could find seemed to proclaim proudly that the UO-8 had the desirable high-flange hubs and the AO-8 had the desirable low-flange hubs. I never did sort out the difference other than one was high and the other low. Okay, those low-flange hubs had nutted axles, but it was a feature seemingly not related to the flange size.
I saw almost no high-performance bikes at the time. Years later and transplanted to a different city and region I began to see nicer bikes. They invariably had low-flange hubs so I associate(d) low-flange with performance. Not that it made any difference, but was just a visual association. Even later I began to see high-flange high-performance hubs, invariably on vintage'y 70's bikes. So I guess it's just as style thing, and perhaps temporal feature too.
So go with what looks right to you. If that doesn't settle the question, go with what looks good (which isn't necessarily the same was what looks right). If that doesn't settle the question, go with what you already or is least expensive.
I saw almost no high-performance bikes at the time. Years later and transplanted to a different city and region I began to see nicer bikes. They invariably had low-flange hubs so I associate(d) low-flange with performance. Not that it made any difference, but was just a visual association. Even later I began to see high-flange high-performance hubs, invariably on vintage'y 70's bikes. So I guess it's just as style thing, and perhaps temporal feature too.
So go with what looks right to you. If that doesn't settle the question, go with what looks good (which isn't necessarily the same was what looks right). If that doesn't settle the question, go with what you already or is least expensive.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#15
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,577
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3856 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,555 Posts
Go with the setup that will make you want to ride them. Couple of years ago I built up a set of high flange hubs to new Pacenti wide polished box section rims. Great wheels. They have been run extensively on pavement as well as at L'Eroica CA and Cino Heroica. Nobody has ever mentioned the age disparity between the hubs and rims, in fact they'll gotten a lot of compliments.
I really dig the looks of the high flange hubs but wanted a super strong versatile freewheel wheelset that could take anything from 25's to 32's.
I really dig the looks of the high flange hubs but wanted a super strong versatile freewheel wheelset that could take anything from 25's to 32's.

#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,710
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 513 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3171 Post(s)
Liked 3,671 Times
in
1,379 Posts
This is pretty solid advice. I thought just having the discussion would help me figure out what I actually wanted, like when you flip a coin and while it's in the air you realize which way you're hoping it will come down. Not this time, though. I think I've firmly decided which way I wanted to go four or five different times as I read through this thread. If I go with low flange I can save myself the trouble of hoping something I get on eBay is as good as it looks. That's today's decision. Maybe I should take measurements and order spokes before I change my mind again.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,233
Mentioned: 649 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4717 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,019 Times
in
1,863 Posts
I'd go with low flange. They're appropriate for high grade, lightweight, road bicycles of all eras. High flange, on the other hand, has a narrower range of application.
However, I have been somewhat influenced on this matter. When I first became seriously involved in cycling, all the top models from the mass manufacturers came equipped with high flange hubs. Conversely, the first examples that I saw from small volume craftsmen like Colnago, Cinelli, De Rosa and Masi, all had low flange hubs. It left a subliminal impression at the time, that low flange hubs were just a little more prestigious.
However, I have been somewhat influenced on this matter. When I first became seriously involved in cycling, all the top models from the mass manufacturers came equipped with high flange hubs. Conversely, the first examples that I saw from small volume craftsmen like Colnago, Cinelli, De Rosa and Masi, all had low flange hubs. It left a subliminal impression at the time, that low flange hubs were just a little more prestigious.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,794
Mentioned: 127 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3235 Post(s)
Liked 2,499 Times
in
1,782 Posts
I'd go with low flange. They're appropriate for high grade, lightweight, road bicycles of all eras. High flange, on the other hand, has a narrower range of application.
However, I have been somewhat influenced on this matter. When I first became seriously involved in cycling, all the top models from the mass manufacturers came equipped with high flange hubs. Conversely, the first examples that I saw from small volume craftsmen like Colnago, Cinelli, De Rosa and Masi, all had low flange hubs. It left a subliminal impression at the time, that low flange hubs were just a little more prestigious.
However, I have been somewhat influenced on this matter. When I first became seriously involved in cycling, all the top models from the mass manufacturers came equipped with high flange hubs. Conversely, the first examples that I saw from small volume craftsmen like Colnago, Cinelli, De Rosa and Masi, all had low flange hubs. It left a subliminal impression at the time, that low flange hubs were just a little more prestigious.
My first road bike had Campagnolo Record High Flange, first race wheels also as I found a pair of hubs for $32.50, price won the day. Money was very dear. After I got a bike shop job, low flange for race wheels save for the track and a high flange pair of Nuovo Tipos I won in a race.
Then came 32 hole… felt like 36's with less weight and more cool factor.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,257
Bikes: 1964 Legnano Roma Olympiade, 1973 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Raleigh Super Course, 1978 Peugeot PR10, 2002 Specialized Allez, 2007 Specialized Roubaix, 2013 Culprit Croz Blade
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 816 Times
in
420 Posts
I would go with whichever hubs the bike came with. Rims are replaceable items, so if they aren't exactly a match, oh well. That being said, I run high flange on both of my vintage bikes, and love the look. Be careful, though. I got a wheelset from a friend when building my Super Course. After around 1200 miles, while cleaning, I found two cracks in the web between the holes on the flange on the rear. The bike rode fine, no wheel wobble, but I found a hub on ebay and had it respoked. All good now.
Last edited by Slightspeed; 11-18-17 at 12:11 PM.
#23
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,547
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2555 Post(s)
Liked 1,578 Times
in
871 Posts
Polished high flange!
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#24
Banned
#25
Senior Member
De Rosa + low flange ftw. On certain other bikes high flange look better to me.
__________________
I.C.
I.C.