26x2.35 tires. Schwalbe Fat Frank or Big Apple?
#1
Thread Starter
Sunshine
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 10,282
From: Des Moines, IA
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
26x2.35 tires. Schwalbe Fat Frank or Big Apple?
Anyone have experience with both?
The Fat Frank is $8.50 and 15g less per tire. Yup, i just used a 1.8% weight difference as a way to separate thr two. I get the weight difference is meaningless.
So are Big Apple tires worth the extra $17? Just trying to jnderstand why there are 2 offerings by Schwalbe which sem so similar(balloon 2.35 width, similar weight).
Tread is different, for what its worth.
Any opinions to separate the two?...otherwise i guess ill just go with the cheaper option.
The Fat Frank is $8.50 and 15g less per tire. Yup, i just used a 1.8% weight difference as a way to separate thr two. I get the weight difference is meaningless.
So are Big Apple tires worth the extra $17? Just trying to jnderstand why there are 2 offerings by Schwalbe which sem so similar(balloon 2.35 width, similar weight).
Tread is different, for what its worth.
Any opinions to separate the two?...otherwise i guess ill just go with the cheaper option.
#2
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,492
Likes: 269
From: STP
My wife and I use the Fat Franks on her Stumpjumper and my Miyata.
Fantastic tires for an el-cheapo price.
Mom's day by gomango1849, on Flickr
Untitled by gomango1849, on Flickr
In addition, I use Big Apples on my Fargo. Again, they have been great tires.
I personally can't tell the difference between the two. The Big Apples may roll a bit better, but that might just be the sizing, air pressure etc.
Where did you see the Fat Franks for $8.50?
I'm cooking up another inexpensive mtb project and I could use a set.
TIA
Fantastic tires for an el-cheapo price.
Mom's day by gomango1849, on Flickr
Untitled by gomango1849, on FlickrIn addition, I use Big Apples on my Fargo. Again, they have been great tires.
I personally can't tell the difference between the two. The Big Apples may roll a bit better, but that might just be the sizing, air pressure etc.
Where did you see the Fat Franks for $8.50?
I'm cooking up another inexpensive mtb project and I could use a set.
TIA
#3
Pretty sure he meant $8.50 cheaper per tire.
I haven’t used the FF but I do like Big Apples and don’t have anything bad to say about them.
Running Kojaks on our tandem now and like them too. They are lighter. But I saw a review recently that said they have high rolling resistance. Not sure why and I didn’t notice, but we are not a fast team.
I haven’t used the FF but I do like Big Apples and don’t have anything bad to say about them.
Running Kojaks on our tandem now and like them too. They are lighter. But I saw a review recently that said they have high rolling resistance. Not sure why and I didn’t notice, but we are not a fast team.
#4
Thread Starter
Sunshine
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 10,282
From: Des Moines, IA
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Sorry for the poor wording on prices, i meant Fat Frank tires are $8.50 less per tire than the Big Apple tire.
#5
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,492
Likes: 269
From: STP
Dont think ive seen the miyata before- nice! Thats similar to what im doing- single speed mtb conversion with a chrome ross mt hood(with chainatray brake) frame i picked up from the forum.
Sorry for the poor wording on prices, i meant Fat Frank tires are $8.50 less per tire than the Big Apple tire.
Sorry for the poor wording on prices, i meant Fat Frank tires are $8.50 less per tire than the Big Apple tire.
No worries on the $8.50. I thought I was going to get some on the cheap.

FWIW I found the Fat Franks recently for $28.95 a while ago on Amazon.
Seemed like a decent price.
#7
Sempiternal Newb
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 636
Likes: 17
From: Panama City, FL
Bikes: '92 Trek 750, '85 Univega Gran Turismo, '95 Stumpjumper,

I've used Fat Franks for several builds for friends, and one build with Big Bens, but haven't spent much time on them myself. I felt that Fat Franks were a little more plush, but couldn't assert that with any scientific confidence. I used Fat Franks more purely because they were the least expensive 2.35" option.
Big Ben:

Fat Franks:
#8
Thread Starter
Sunshine
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 10,282
From: Des Moines, IA
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Fat Franks are in the mail and should be here Monday. Thanks all! Its nice when the cheaper option is still a great one.
#10
Thread Starter
Sunshine
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 18,729
Likes: 10,282
From: Des Moines, IA
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Interested?...FS- 2 Schwalbe 26x2.35" Fat Frank tires. $35 shipped to lower 48
#11
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,492
Likes: 269
From: STP
They were great. I pulled em off the bike and sold the frame since I barely used it. Maybe 15 miles over 18 months. But the tires were awesome. Months between tiding and I wouldnt even pump the tires up- the size is great!
Interested?...FS- 2 Schwalbe 26x2.35" Fat Frank tires. $35 shipped to lower 48
Interested?...FS- 2 Schwalbe 26x2.35" Fat Frank tires. $35 shipped to lower 48
They might fit an old Moots frameset my kids have sitting here.







