Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

20th Century bike, 21st century tubes (and tires)

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

20th Century bike, 21st century tubes (and tires)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-18, 01:13 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,438

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 635 Times in 405 Posts
20th Century bike, 21st century tubes (and tires)

OK, I decided to try something more "modern" and decided to replace the 23mm Vredstein Fortezza tires (running at 145psi) with a set of Continental 4000S in 28mm (to run at 115PSI, apparently the max) after reading on-line about lowered rolling resistance. Installed them and also decided on Vittoria latex tubes. Installed them and the bike sat for over a week due to being sick (still am, actually). Went for a ride finally on Wednesday. These seemed to be at least as fast as what I took off, subjectively, and I can get used to not having the boneshaker ride, I guess. Well, 10 miles into an 18 mile ride, lost air in the front tire. Swapping in a spare (butyl) tube, could not locate the hole but I installed anyway and made it home. Looking closer at the holed tube, it looks like a spoke-head 'nick', I could not find the offending spoke but the rim strips seem to be original equipment, 1980 vintage. Went to the LBS and bought "plastic" replacement rim bands, and am cleaning up the rims to install -- stalling because the spoke ends and nipples are recessed enough that I need a small Dremel bit to grind anything down, so off to Big Orange I'll go before proceeding further.

Meanwhile, a question. I've been reading about Presta tubes with removable cores to install sealant "goop". Of course, right now, that sounds interesting. Looking closely at the Presta valve, right below the usual loosen-to-inflate-knurled knob, the uppermost part of the rest of the valve is a silver color and might have faint "flats" where the rest of the valve (51mm) is smooth brass with no threads. Is this where the core removes and, if so, what kind of tool? Should I install "goop"?

BTW, these tires really look fat, and I read on-line that the 28's are in truth even wider than that, they clear the chain stays but not by a huge amount, perhaps I should have bought 25's.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 10-12-18, 01:24 PM
  #2  
In the wind
 
mercator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 1,338

Bikes: Giant TCR Advanced Team, Lemond Buenos Aires, Giant TCX, Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 172 Post(s)
Liked 120 Times in 54 Posts
You really run 145psi? Do you mind if I ask what you weigh?
mercator is online now  
Old 10-12-18, 04:37 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,846

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,823 Times in 1,541 Posts
nice is the park tool..... but my tufo sealant for tubulars came with a little plastic job...... I can say to let the pressure out first....I am still looking for my part tool in the garage after not doing so
,
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  
Old 10-12-18, 04:41 PM
  #4  
Ellensburg, WA
 
scozim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ellensburg, WA
Posts: 3,755

Bikes: See my signature

Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 458 Times in 160 Posts
Originally Posted by mercator
You really run 145psi? Do you mind if I ask what you weigh?
That's the first thing that struck me too except for the weight thing. I normally run at 120 psi and only went higher with some tubulars in a hill climb race
__________________
1984 Gitane Tour de France; 1968 Peugeot PL8; 1982 Nishiki Marina 12; 1984 Peugeot PSV; 1993 Trek 950 mtb; 1983 Vitus 979; Colnago Super, mid-80's Bianchi Veloce, 1984 or 85 Vitus 979




scozim is offline  
Old 10-12-18, 04:49 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,438

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 635 Times in 405 Posts
Thanks for the input!

Originally Posted by mercator
You really run 145psi? Do you mind if I ask what you weigh?
150PSI indicated on my Park pump seems to work out to 145PSI on my digital gauge, so, yeah. Weight? I retired at 209LB, currently 184.2LB, won't relent until I am at least in the upper 160's.

Originally Posted by squirtdad
I can say to let the pressure out first...
Hence the user name "squirtdad"? I can imagine that qualifies and "hardest lessons, best learned"
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 10-12-18, 04:53 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,269
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1979 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by tiger1964
Weight? I retired at 209LB, currently 184.2LB, won't relent until I am at least in the upper 160's.
If I were you, I'd ride those 28s considerably softer than 115PSI. Maybe somewhere in the 85-100 range for the rear tire.
HTupolev is offline  
Old 10-12-18, 05:05 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
davester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,536

Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 1,292 Times in 488 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
If I were you, I'd ride those 28s considerably softer than 115PSI. Maybe somewhere in the 85-100 range for the rear tire.
Ditto. You weigh the same as I do. By pretty much any tire pressure guideline out there you are way over the recommended pressure for your weight and tire width. You're losing out on the advantages (comfort, lowered rolling resistance, cornering grip) of running a wider tire by overinflating. I'd suggest something like 90 rear/75 front.

Also, overinflating the tire will make the tire fatter.
davester is online now  
Old 10-12-18, 05:12 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
masi61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682

Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times in 315 Posts
The Set up of latex tubes and the type of rim tape you use is pretty important. Plastic rim strips often have sharp edges that can lead to spontaneous internal punctures. I still use Velox cotton canvas tape which seems to work well with the Vittoria tubes. I have heard that tubeless rim tape, which is quite thin, can be better yet. Apparently it works not just for tubeless but tubed applications as well.
I have been running Michelin Power Endurance tires (700 x 25) with Vittoria latex tubes on my Velocity A23 polished rims for about 3,000 miles this year to good effect. They do lose 10 to 20 psi per day, so checking pressure and pumping up before each ride is a requirement. Everybody has their own optimal pressure based on their body weight, the width of the tire and the quality of roads but for me I have been exploring the results from running less pressure. I weigh #195 and ride a stiff aluminum frame over chip seal type roads a lot. So 90 front and 100 rear is a little more comfortable than the 100 front, 110 rear that I used to run. I’m going to try 85 front, 95 rear next...

I was thinking that the 21st century part of this thread was going to involve tubeless tire content. Just yesterday I dropped off some used Dura Ace 7800 hubs at my LBS along with some DT Swiss R460 rims (24 front, 28 rear). These will go on one of my older road bikes with rim brakes, 130mm rear spacing and 10 speed rear cassette max. I bought Panaracer 700x25 tubeless tires from Excelsports Boulder for a good price ($52 each). I’m real excited to try them out. My suspicion is that really nicely designed tubeless tires like this when laced up on vintage hubs to modern tubeless ready rims - could be a game changer.
masi61 is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 06:33 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,438

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 635 Times in 405 Posts
Any thought on the tube cores?

Originally Posted by davester
Ditto. You weigh the same as I do. By pretty much any tire pressure guideline out there you are way over the recommended pressure for your weight and tire width. You're losing out on the advantages (comfort, lowered rolling resistance, cornering grip) of running a wider tire by overinflating. I'd suggest something like 90 rear/75 front.

Also, overinflating the tire will make the tire fatter.
Interesting, although this website https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...0s-ii-23-25-28 shows a steady decline in rolling resistance with increasing PSI. This is what drove me to change tire brands in the first place.

Originally Posted by masi61
The Set up of latex tubes and the type of rim tape you use is pretty important. Plastic rim strips often have sharp edges that can lead to spontaneous internal punctures. I still use Velox cotton canvas tape which seems to work well with the Vittoria tubes. I have heard that tubeless rim tape, which is quite thin, can be better yet. Apparently it works not just for tubeless but tubed applications as well.
I have been running Michelin Power Endurance tires (700 x 25) with Vittoria latex tubes on my Velocity A23 polished rims for about 3,000 miles this year to good effect. They do lose 10 to 20 psi per day, so checking pressure and pumping up before each ride is a requirement.
Shoot! Might need to drive 1 hour round trip to the LBS to exchange the strips -- I was given a choice and chose the plastic over tape. Was told basically no difference. You know, on my rims, the spoke tips and the heads of the nipples are recessed pretty far below the level of where the rim strip resides -- you'd think I wouldn't be having any issues at all.

I was topping off the old tires before every ride anyway, I've just noticed it's a few more pumps with the new ones, I figure between the latex tubes and the fact that the fat tires have more cc's of space in them anyway...
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 07:01 AM
  #10  
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,940
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 974 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 352 Posts
"The 28s seem really fat". I've never had 28s, but most reports on BF say they are wider, maybe 30 or even 32mm. But some have measured them as close to 28mm. Wider rims will let the tires be wider.
Search google: site:bikeforums.net GP4000 28 measured actual width

"...at 115 psi..."
Wow, that's way too high pressure.
Unless your roads are extremely smooth, very high pressures aren't faster, the bumps and vibrations use up energy, too. Let the tire sidewalls flex over rough roads, it'll be way more comfortable and at least as fast.

Try lowering the pressure 10 psi per ride -- it will take a few rides to get used to it. It'll likely feel weird at first.
Davester is right, try 75 psi front, 90 psi rear! (perhaps even a little lower.)

I'm at 170 pounds, and have very wide rims, so the 25mm GP4000S measure 29mm.
I use 65 psi front, 80 psi rear. For smooth roads and a very fast paced group ride, I'll go about 70 psi front, 85 psi rear. It might be marginally faster.
That's about 15% less pressure on the front, which is correct for a 45% front - 55% rear weight distribution.

Even on 23mm on standard width rims, I used 105-110 psi rear, 95-100 psi front, and probably could have lowered it.

~~~~

Originally Posted by tiger1964
Any thought on the tube cores?



Interesting, although this website https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...0s-ii-23-25-28 shows a steady decline in rolling resistance with increasing PSI. This is what drove me to change tire brands in the first place.
...snip...
The big advantage of tires like the GP4000S are the overall lower rolling resistance (and better grip, too), compared to stiffer, puncture resistant tires. These good tires are still fast at reasonable pressures.

The chart shows the 28mm at:
120 psi: 11.6 watts
100 psi: 12.0 watts
080 psi: 12.7 watts

Just one watt higher at 80 psi.


Last edited by rm -rf; 10-13-18 at 07:31 AM.
rm -rf is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 07:16 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 247 Posts
Some still unanswered questions here. Valve cores are not hard to remove. Needle nose pliers are fine. It would take a while to name the improvised tools that work. Sealant in clincher innertubes is not standard practice, but interesting enough to experiment with. If you want to give it a try, Orange Seal does not dry out for years.

The less clearance you have from tire to frame the more likely you are to have problems. Question is how bad you want the fat tires and how much would you risk for that. Jan Heine says 3mm is enough, my bikes I don't use less than 5mm, the 50s and 60s bikes I ride would have had more like 10mm as original. Others would see 10mm clearance as just an opportunity to stuff in some big tires.

Conti GP4000 iiS in 28mm nominal size will be in the range of 31mm wide when inflated on the current standard 23mm rims. On older standard 20mm rims the tires are more like 29mm wide. But there are enough other factors that you don't know unless you measure. At 31mm wide and your weight 60-70psi would be enough. At 29mm 70-80psi. They are very good tires and will tolerate a wide range of inflation pressures without ill effect. You will not experience sudden catastrophic loss of braking traction. You will wear the tires out faster. The rims are overstressed.

The bicyclerollingresistance website puts tires through a fixed protocol and tests lots of pressures no one would ever use. The drum tests only test what they test. Real world performance is different.

You lost 25 pounds? Wish I could. Congratulations.
63rickert is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 07:24 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 247 Posts
One more. Don't travel to LBS just to change rim strips. Lots of things work. For the past 30 years my wheels mostly get fibered strapping tape. There are plastic strips with a sharp edge and plastic strips that never cause problems. If using latex tubes this little stuff might matter. Or it might not.
63rickert is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 07:37 AM
  #13  
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,940
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 974 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 352 Posts
Latex tubes
I've considered using latex, but decided against them. They seem just too fragile, and lose air fast, too. I think they'd only save a couple of watts. (The rolling resistance tests show these tires at around 10-15 watts per tire, how much lower could it go by switching tubes to latex?)

Instead, I use the "ultralight" tubes, which are in the 80 grams range instead of around 100 grams. I expect these thinner tubes will be a bit more comfortable, too.
The rolled up spare tube in my saddle bag takes up less space, too!

Last edited by rm -rf; 10-13-18 at 07:42 AM.
rm -rf is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 12:58 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
masi61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682

Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times in 315 Posts
Originally Posted by tiger1964
Any thought on the tube cores?



Interesting, although this website https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...0s-ii-23-25-28 shows a steady decline in rolling resistance with increasing PSI. This is what drove me to change tire brands in the first place.



Shoot! Might need to drive 1 hour round trip to the LBS to exchange the strips -- I was given a choice and chose the plastic over tape. Was told basically no difference. You know, on my rims, the spoke tips and the heads of the nipples are recessed pretty far below the level of where the rim strip resides -- you'd think I wouldn't be having any issues at all.

I was topping off the old tires before every ride anyway, I've just noticed it's a few more pumps with the new ones, I figure between the latex tubes and the fact that the fat tires have more cc's of space in them anyway...
Maybe you could share what brand of plastic rim tape they sold you.

We're mostly postulating that the sharp edges of the the plastic rim tape contributed to the latex inner tube puncture but there are other possibilities to rule out as well.

1) It could have been a minor pinch under the tire bead during installation. It is especially important with latex tubes to go all the way around once installed with just slight pressure, pressing in the sidewalls all 360 degrees of rotation (valve stem until valve stem comes around again) and if you visualized any pink colored inner tube under the bead, let some air out and manipulate the bead until it is no longer visible. Using talc or baby powder during installation helps for some (I use Rema Tiptop talc and like it). Others say talc is unnecessary.

2) check the tire and rim for any burrs or sharp protrusions. Sometimes butyl tubes will go along fine when there is a shard of glass partly penetrating the tire casing. The same small protrusion could be enough to create a puncture.
masi61 is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 02:24 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,438

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 635 Times in 405 Posts
Originally Posted by rm -rf
Try lowering the pressure 10 psi per ride -- it will take a few rides to get used to it. It'll likely feel weird at first.
Davester is right, try 75 psi front, 90 psi rear! (perhaps even a little lower.)
I'm willing to try that, except I've only been able to get off the toilet once in the past ten days long enough to ride -- I've found a malady that causes me to lose weight faster than the cycling does. Anyway, already was willing to get outside my comfort zone of the 145PSI pizza-cutters to try these. I'll attempt a baseline and then see what inflation results in best performance. Most of my time is on paved trails, I'm not really "bouncing", the rock-hard tires were already working OK.

Originally Posted by 63rickert
Some still unanswered questions here. Valve cores are not hard to remove. Needle nose pliers are fine. It would take a while to name the improvised tools that work. Sealant in clincher innertubes is not standard practice, but interesting enough to experiment with. If you want to give it a try, Orange Seal does not dry out for years.

The less clearance you have from tire to frame the more likely you are to have problems. Question is how bad you want the fat tires and how much would you risk for that.(SNIP)

You lost 25 pounds? Wish I could. Congratulations.
I might try the Park PC1 tool and Orange Seal. Who knows? As for clearance, I'll admit the rear wheel was a wee bit out of true, I spent some time on it and it looks better now, hopefully the tire won't drag on the chain stays not the rim on the rear brake. Hopefully, at 25LB lost, I have not hit a "wall" and I continue to lose weight, especially once I get away from flatlander riding and hit real hills.

Originally Posted by 63rickert
One more. Don't travel to LBS just to change rim strips. Lots of things work. For the past 30 years my wheels mostly get fibered strapping tape. There are plastic strips with a sharp edge and plastic strips that never cause problems. If using latex tubes this little stuff might matter. Or it might not.
Guess what I found as a rear rim tape on this bike? Strapping tape. Ugh, a mess to get off, either the previous owner did that, or I did 20 years ago when I bought the bike, I cannot remember. The LBS gladly exchanged the plastic strips for tape, time to go install it.

Originally Posted by rm -rf
Latex tubes
I've considered using latex, but decided against them. They seem just too fragile, and lose air fast, too. I think they'd only save a couple of watts.
Fair enough, but mere seconds on a one-hour ride is proving to be a good motivator, or otherwise I'd simply ride a 1950's newsboy bike.

Originally Posted by masi61
We're mostly postulating that the sharp edges of the the plastic rim tape contributed to the latex inner tube puncture but there are other possibilities to rule out as well.

1) It could have been a minor pinch under the tire bead during installation.
This is what drove me to exchange the rim strips. Plus, I spent a chunk of time trying to ensure I did not have any pinches -- think I did OK there.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 10-13-18, 05:16 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
davester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,536

Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 1,292 Times in 488 Posts
Originally Posted by tiger1964
Interesting, although this website https://www.bicyclerollingresistance...0s-ii-23-25-28 shows a steady decline in rolling resistance with increasing PSI. This is what drove me to change tire brands in the first place.
Unfortunately, the testing protocol on that website measures only one of the two main components of rolling resistance. It measures the component that results from tire deformation, which consistently decreases with higher pressures. There's been a ton of work in the last decade or so on the other main component, which is the energy lost to vibration (i.e. lifting of the bike up and down over road irregularities. Even over relatively smooth roads this component is significant and increases with higher pressures, which is why racers have been switching to wider tires and lower pressures than were used ten years ago.
davester is online now  
Old 10-15-18, 05:03 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1090 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 247 Posts
Not so much switching to wider and lower than ten years ago as reverting to what was used 50 or more years ago. Skinny and hard was a blind alley that lasted too long.
63rickert is offline  
Old 10-15-18, 09:53 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,438

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 635 Times in 405 Posts
Originally Posted by davester
There's been a ton of work in the last decade or so on the other main component, which is the energy lost to vibration (i.e. lifting of the bike up and down over road irregularities.
Any of that info available on-line?

Regardless, feeling well enough now to at least work on the bike a bit. The replacement rim tape is Velox brand, 16mm width. Alas, my rims (Super Champion "Gentleman") really did not want to accommodate the width, so I've been narrowing the tape to about 9mm with scissors... very tedious. About to remount the tires and if the weather clears tomorrow, venture out again. Wish me luck. Once I establish a baseline, I'll try lower pressures; as I still have a faint memory of the 70PSI Michelins on my 1971 Gitane, which felt like pedaling through pudding, this should be interesting.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 10-16-18, 07:12 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,438

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 635 Times in 405 Posts
Originally Posted by tiger1964
if the weather clears tomorrow, venture out again. Wish me luck. Once I establish a baseline, I'll try lower pressures.
Did my usual 18.06 miles today; elapsed time just a whicker of my usual at 1h 1m 5s. As that's only my 2nd ride in two weeks and I presume I'm still weak, I guess OK; not enough to establish a baseline, perhaps average of 3 rides? Then maybe I'll try, eh, 105PSI.

On my Q in post #1 , right now on one latex tube w/removable core and one butyl w/out, so I cannot try goop even if I had some and the tool. Something to try later.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 10-16-18, 08:05 PM
  #20  
Clark W. Griswold
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,523

Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26

Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4357 Post(s)
Liked 3,994 Times in 2,665 Posts
Dude that is crazy PSI! I am quite a bit heavier than you and run my 28s max at 90 PSI and frequently a little lower. I wouldn't load up with any goop or sealant just lower your pressure a bit and you will probably be in better shape. Extreme high pressures like that is for pro riders with a team car or neutral service tailing behind or in front. They also are happy to punish themselves day in and day out for glory, we don't have to do that.
veganbikes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bikeforumuser0011
Commuting
7
08-14-13 06:15 PM
jowilson
Bicycle Mechanics
6
06-27-13 04:09 AM
Podagrower
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
7
06-24-13 07:57 AM
njlonghorn
Bicycle Mechanics
11
06-23-12 09:37 PM
FixedAgenda
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
6
01-19-11 05:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.