Uncaged bottom bracket bearings?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,979
Likes: 2,158
From: Evanston, IL
Bikes: many
Uncaged bottom bracket bearings?
I bought a Sugino MW-68 bottom bracket to use with an early Superbe crank on my Griffon. The cups and spindle are in good shape. It came with loose bearings. Is there any reason to prefer caged bearings over loose other than the challenge of keeping loose bearings in place during assembly?
__________________
My bikes
My bikes
#2
~>~
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,929
Likes: 187
From: TX Hill Country
No there is not, but I've never seen a Japanese OEM BB from the '60's onward w/ loose bearings.
Used I'd be very careful to get the bearing size/number correct.
-Bandera
Used I'd be very careful to get the bearing size/number correct.
-Bandera
Last edited by Bandera; 06-11-19 at 07:42 PM.
#6
Caged bearings are superior to loose and there is no point unless you just want to be really really old school . Lots of conjecture about being able to install more loose balls versus a cage , but that is all that it is. Those cages arent there for a cost savings, they maintain properly spacing
#7
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 1,155
From: Down Under
Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.
Caged bearings are superior to loose and there is no point unless you just want to be really really old school . Lots of conjecture about being able to install more loose balls versus a cage , but that is all that it is. Those cages arent there for a cost savings, they maintain properly spacing
Cartridge type roller bearings (except for full complement) have cages because of the way they are assembled. The balls are placed together in the outer race, the inner race inserted then the balls evenly distributed and the cage fitted to maintain spacing so the bearing doesn't fall apart. This is a different situation to a bottom bracket. Full complement bearings have indents in the side of the races so the balls can be inserted one by one with the indents lined up.
#9
[MENTION=410984]Trevtassie[/MENTION]
I am going to assume you are aware that many engineering studies have been performed concerning this very topic. Yes there is definitely manufacturing efficiency and cost savings in using caged balls , however they are also better at what they do.
There is a lot of information available out there concerning this very topic. As I said earlier if you want to use them because it makes you feel better being a traditionalist fine, there is no performance benefit to be realized however .
I am going to assume you are aware that many engineering studies have been performed concerning this very topic. Yes there is definitely manufacturing efficiency and cost savings in using caged balls , however they are also better at what they do.
There is a lot of information available out there concerning this very topic. As I said earlier if you want to use them because it makes you feel better being a traditionalist fine, there is no performance benefit to be realized however .
#10
Senior Member


Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,169
Likes: 1,798
From: Madison, WI USA
+1; keyword sticky. For those who like to use waterproof marine grease, I found (by chance) that Liquid Wrench brand marine grease (reddish [almost Shimano] color) is definitely stickier than the other brands you typically find at a FLAPS or home store.
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,979
Likes: 2,158
From: Evanston, IL
Bikes: many
Thanks for all the responses. The spacing argument seemed like it would be worth investigating, so I hunted around a bit to see what Jobst Brandt had to say about the topic. In this rec.bicycles.tech thread, he wrote:
Hmmm. Sir Sheldon disagrees:
Unfortunately, we can't ask either Jobst or Sheldon. 
I do have some Campy caged bearings, not in front of me, though what I've read suggests they probably hold 11 bearings. The reason for buying the Sugino was that I lacked a suitable Campy spindle. This bb was cheap enough that even if I didn't use the cups and bearings, I'd have a spindle I could use. I think I will try 11 loose bearings and see how it goes. Unless the ride is so magical that I sell every other bike I own and start riding 20k miles per year, based on what I've read I rather suspect there will be little effective lifetime wear difference between 9 caged, 11 caged or 11 loose bearings.
Full complement ball bearings, as I mentioned, can also have cages,
whose purpose is ease and reliability of assembly rather than to alter
friction or wear characteristics.... The reason for ball or roller cages in
bearings is for assembly rather than a load related one except in ones
where the cage allows using fewer balls for economic effect.
whose purpose is ease and reliability of assembly rather than to alter
friction or wear characteristics.... The reason for ball or roller cages in
bearings is for assembly rather than a load related one except in ones
where the cage allows using fewer balls for economic effect.
Most newer bicycles come with "caged" bearing balls-the balls are held in a metal or plastic retainer. This makes it easier to install the balls, but usually at a cost in performance. A standard three-piece type bottom bracket takes 11 loose 1/4-inch balls per side. Most retainers hold fewer balls, so each ball and its contact points with the cup and cone are more heavily stressed. This causes higher friction and more rapid wear.

I do have some Campy caged bearings, not in front of me, though what I've read suggests they probably hold 11 bearings. The reason for buying the Sugino was that I lacked a suitable Campy spindle. This bb was cheap enough that even if I didn't use the cups and bearings, I'd have a spindle I could use. I think I will try 11 loose bearings and see how it goes. Unless the ride is so magical that I sell every other bike I own and start riding 20k miles per year, based on what I've read I rather suspect there will be little effective lifetime wear difference between 9 caged, 11 caged or 11 loose bearings.
__________________
My bikes
My bikes
#13
~>~
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,929
Likes: 187
From: TX Hill Country
#14
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,383
Likes: 5,304
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

https://www.biketoolsetc.com/index.c...m_id=US-GR1411
#15
Bike Butcher of Portland


Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 12,475
Likes: 8,033
From: Portland, OR
Bikes: It's complicated.
Sealed.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#16
Senior Member




Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 21,823
Likes: 5,777
From: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Campagnolo bottom bracket bearing retainers hold 11 balls each. Other companies also used 11-ball retainers, and replacements are available. These will work with pretty much any bottom bracket that uses 1/4" balls:

https://www.biketoolsetc.com/index.c...m_id=US-GR1411

https://www.biketoolsetc.com/index.c...m_id=US-GR1411
#19
Classic, Vintage Mechanic

Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 118
Likes: 42
From: Vancouver B.C. Canada
Bikes: '65 Legnano Gran Primeo || '76 Holdsworth Mistral || '82 Specialized Stumpjumper
[MENTION=410984]Trevtassie[/MENTION]
I am going to assume you are aware that many engineering studies have been performed concerning this very topic. Yes there is definitely manufacturing efficiency and cost savings in using caged balls , however they are also better at what they do...
I am going to assume you are aware that many engineering studies have been performed concerning this very topic. Yes there is definitely manufacturing efficiency and cost savings in using caged balls , however they are also better at what they do...
#20
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 1,155
From: Down Under
Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.
There are advantages in high speed bearings, especially to do with grease retention and friction between the balls when centripetal forces come into play . There aren't any high speed bearings on a bicycle, derailleur pulleys maybe get into the bottom end of medium speed bearings. There's probably not even that much point using ceramic bearings, they are actually designed for extremely high speeds, where the lightness of the rolling elements means less angular forces on the outside race.
#21
Thread Starter
Senior Member


Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,979
Likes: 2,158
From: Evanston, IL
Bikes: many
OK, I installed the Sugino MW-68 with Campagnolo caged bearings. Thanks for the inputs. I suppose next time I need to replace the bottom bracket on this bike I can go "full [MENTION=381793]gugie[/MENTION]" and source a Phil bottom bracket.
#22
Will the Vice President of engineering at a company which builds precision manufacturing equipment do?
Caged balls are widely deployed in motion systems throughout industry. Whether used in ball bearings, linear guides, or ball screw actuators, caged balls bring both performance and practicality. The addition of the cage minimizes wear, reduces noise, and extends maintenance intervals. The technology also significantly boosts the lifetime of the device compared to non-cage versions. These attributes have made caged balls the go-to technology for a variety of applications.
all cages provide a number of benefits, including:
- Minimizing metal-to-metal contact
- Ensuring orderly ball movement
- Improving high-speed performance
- Retaining grease for longer lifetime
The ability to retain lubricant reduces maintenance, decreases unscheduled downtime, and enhances performance. It is also useful from a business standpoint. OEMs typically specify lubrication intervals for their equipment, but end-users often don’t comply. Designing in caged balls means that even if the asset owner doesn’t follow proper maintenance procedures, the OEM can still have confidence that the equipment will operate as expected.
Caged balls are not always a perfect fit, of course. In a few cases, non-caged balls may be a better fit:
Caged balls are not always a perfect fit, of course. In a few cases, non-caged balls may be a better fit:
- Applications with temperatures over 80°C
- High-vacuum applications
- Extreme-radiation environments
- Applications with extremely light loads, for which the friction introduced by ball cages can present issues
I have read countless articles and technical studies and have yet to find a single one that advocates loose bearings as being superior for most applications where caged bearings are used. I am not against you or anyone else using loose balls because it makes you feel better, but it does not outperform quality caged ball bearings .
#24
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,409
Likes: 1,875
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Best of both worlds -- full-complement caged bearings. Sounds like a winner all around.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#25






