Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Motobecane bottom bracket confusion...

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Motobecane bottom bracket confusion...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-20 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 1,526
From: Tucson, AZ
Motobecane bottom bracket confusion...

There is some discussion on this in a sale thread but figure it could use its own thread rather than be lost in the sales forum.

Building up a 1976 Motobecane Super Mirage mixte for someone. I've got a frame and no BB. I was told here that if it's not french threaded it is likely Swiss. Either way, not English. At a LBS they checked it out and told me that an english threaded BB would work. I was very skeptical and told them its likely french or Swiss. They didnt know what Swiss threading was. They tested it and said it was all good. This picture if the result. Drive side went in just fine counter clockwise. NDS went in fine clockwise up to a point. This is how much threading is left sticking out. I know a little is bound to show, but this seems like a whole lot to me. They told me it was normal.

The crankset is Stronglight 93, on which I will only be using the 45t ring. This BB is 68x103.

As this bike is for someone else I want to make sure it's all done correctly and safely. Thoughts?



Last edited by polymorphself; 09-02-20 at 06:14 PM.
polymorphself is online now  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 06:03 PM
  #2  
juvela's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,369
Likes: 4,393
From: Alta California
-----

if you are confident of the date then it could not be BSC unless someone has altered it

people at bike shop sound uninformed

BSC cups will start to go in to a CH shell because their pitch diameter is 34.85 and metric/CH thread is 35.0mm pitch diameter

-----
juvela is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 06:07 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 1,526
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by juvela
-----

if you are confident of the date then it could not be BSC unless someone has altered it

people at bike shop sound uninformed

BSC cups will start to go in to a CH shell because their pitch diameter is 34.85 and metric/CH thread is 35.0mm pitch diameter

-----
Is there a chance damage has been done to the threading at this point? And I'm not 100% on the date but at least 80%. It's between 1975 and 1977 for sure.

Last edited by polymorphself; 09-02-20 at 06:15 PM.
polymorphself is online now  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 07:03 PM
  #4  
juvela's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,369
Likes: 4,393
From: Alta California
-----

those dates are definitely too early for BSC shell for MB

damage to shell:

one thing which could always be done is to run a set of CH taps through to clear/reform threads and then fit a CH bottom bracket assembly


-----
juvela is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 07:12 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 1,526
From: Tucson, AZ
I swear this is the last french single speed conversion I take on for anyone

Looking to pick up this which nlerner used in a similar era Moto, but unsure if 110 is an ok size or single speed with the Stronglight crank: https://www.amazon.com/Sunlite-Threa...NXM?th=1&psc=1

Last edited by polymorphself; 09-02-20 at 07:15 PM.
polymorphself is online now  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 07:21 PM
  #6  
juvela's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,369
Likes: 4,393
From: Alta California
-----

the OEM Stronglight spindle used with the model 93 chainset would have been either model 118 or 120 for a two plateau drive train

since you are going single plateau one would expect an ideal chainline to be achieved with a spindle several mm shorter than the 118-120 size

the design of the cartridge you linked to appears not to permit one to fine tune their chainline as is possible with a system such as the Phil Wood


-----

Last edited by juvela; 09-02-20 at 07:29 PM.
juvela is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 07:27 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 1,526
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by juvela
-----

the OEM Stronglight spindle used with the model 93 chainset would have been either 118 or 120 for a two plateau drive train

since you are going single plateau one would expect an ideal chainline to be achieved with a spindle several mm shorter than the 118-120 size


-----
Which may also make the 103mm that the LBS gave me far too short. I just threw an arm on and it's mighty close to the chain stay in rotation...

Would you recommend 116 or 110?
polymorphself is online now  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 07:58 PM
  #8  
juvela's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,369
Likes: 4,393
From: Alta California
-----

Me "guesstimate" would be that the 110 would be the better size.

One jumbo caveat: have no experience converting two plateau drive trains to single plateau.


-----
juvela is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 08:24 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Sheldon Brown Memorial - Titanium
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 18,822
Likes: 11,676
In that other thread, you mentioned using a mod. 93 crankset with a single ring. Those need a fair amount of clearance because of the “shoulders” that hold the inner ring. I’d probably opt for the 116 though maybe you can get away with the 110 if you use a couple of 1mm spacers on the drive side.
nlerner is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 08:58 PM
  #10  
rustystrings61's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 3,409
From: Greenwood SC USA

Bikes: 2002 Mercian Vincitore, 1982 Mercian Colorado, 1976 Puch Royal X, 1973 Raleigh Competition, 1971 Gitane Tour de France and others

Stronglight used a 113 mm spindle for their track bottom bracket setups - I ran one for years with a mod. 93 that I shaved down the inner ledges - the Trek I was using it with was tight on clearances. I ran the chainring in the outside position with good chainline that way.

i am currently running a Phil Wood unit I snagged used with French rings - but I would be better served with a 107 Phil.
rustystrings61 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-02-20 | 09:10 PM
  #11  
juvela's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,369
Likes: 4,393
From: Alta California
-----

that reminds me -

the T.A. spindle for single plateau is Nr. 314

the Phil Nr. 1 has an overall length of 108

and the Nr. 2 and overall length of 113

-----
juvela is offline  
Reply
Old 09-03-20 | 10:17 AM
  #12  
due ruote's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,474
Likes: 559
Originally Posted by polymorphself
Which may also make the 103mm that the LBS gave me far too short. I just threw an arm on and it's mighty close to the chain stay in rotation...

Would you recommend 116 or 110?
Does “threw it on” Include torqueing? If it was properly torqued and not hitting the stay, I wouldn’t go much longer for the spindle.
due ruote is offline  
Reply
Old 09-03-20 | 11:01 AM
  #13  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,411
Likes: 1,876
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Swiss threading is very likely on a Motobecane of that vintage. They stayed with hard metric threading, but finally got the fixed cup thread direction right (actually left). Peugeot belatedly caught up a few years later -- I was surprised to discover that my 1980 PKN-10 is Swiss-threaded, rather than French.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 09-03-20 | 12:57 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 1,526
From: Tucson, AZ
Originally Posted by due ruote
Does “threw it on” Include torqueing? If it was properly torqued and not hitting the stay, I wouldn’t go much longer for the spindle.
This is where it's at. So if this is 103, I'm thinking the 106 above will be ok. The 110 will likely be too much.

polymorphself is online now  
Reply
Old 09-03-20 | 02:26 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 1,526
From: Tucson, AZ
Welp, time is very much of the essence so I’m ordering the pricey one from VO as the 106 on amazon has sold out and the shipping time is several weeks anyways

The last time I did a similar build (Peugeot mixte early 70s with the same single ring Stronglight 93) it looks like I used a 113 (just went back and looked at that order), which is surprising...but it worked.

So based on the photo above which is 103, should I go with that or 110?

Last edited by polymorphself; 09-03-20 at 02:48 PM.
polymorphself is online now  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.