Hey Miyata people, help me out!
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: New York City
Posts: 141
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Interval TG
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hey Miyata people, help me out!
Hi,
I just came across a NOS 1999 Team Miyata in my size and I'm buying it!! I could go on and on about how excited I am, but there is one piece I'm not thrilled about. The Team Miyata from that year has an aluminum fork. I'm sure some might feel it's lame to think about switching it out for steel or carbon, but it's crossed my mind. So, what would you do?
I just came across a NOS 1999 Team Miyata in my size and I'm buying it!! I could go on and on about how excited I am, but there is one piece I'm not thrilled about. The Team Miyata from that year has an aluminum fork. I'm sure some might feel it's lame to think about switching it out for steel or carbon, but it's crossed my mind. So, what would you do?
#2
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,809
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista Vitus 979
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3141 Post(s)
Liked 6,851 Times
in
3,917 Posts
I have never seen a 99 Team Miyata. Can you post some pictures?
__________________
#3
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 942 Times
in
504 Posts
So, what would you do?
Ride it and see if I like it.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,794
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 157 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2355 Post(s)
Liked 5,323 Times
in
1,854 Posts
Yep, ride it first and see how it feels. The aluminum one on my 1999 Schwinn Circuit was harsh unless the road surface was perfectly smooth, the one on my Vitus Argal was downright scary at speed because it felt vague and was all over the place. The one on my Bridgestone Mile 112 was divine. Solid and precise yet not too harsh on the rough chipseal.
You can't expect them all to be the same or to ride like junk. You need to ride them and see how it works for you and your style of riding.
You can't expect them all to be the same or to ride like junk. You need to ride them and see how it works for you and your style of riding.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
Last edited by jamesdak; 04-18-21 at 07:04 PM.
Likes For jamesdak:
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: New York City
Posts: 141
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Interval TG
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yep, ride it first and see how it feels. The aluminum one on my 1999 Schwinn Circuit was harsh unless the road service was perfectly smooth, the one on my Vitus Argal was downright scary at speed because it felt vague and was all over the place. The one on my Bridgestone Mile 112 was divine. Solid and precise yet to harsh on the rough chipseal.
You can't expect them all to be the same or to ride like junk. You need to ride them and see how it works for you and your style of riding.
You can't expect them all to be the same or to ride like junk. You need to ride them and see how it works for you and your style of riding.
wow i had no idea there was that much variance between those forks, thanks for the input.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,319
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 660 Post(s)
Liked 601 Times
in
314 Posts
I have an ‘88 Cannondale Criterium with an aftermarket Sakae FX Litage aluminum fork. On busted up cracked asphalt it is a bit rough but I’m rather used to it. On new pavement nothing compares to the road feel I get, very smooth and controllable.
#8
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,439
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 1,304 Times
in
708 Posts
I'd say ride it and consider adding a carbon fork later. You're the one riding it and I have heard many people enjoy the change on a vintage steel frame.
If they made compatible touring forks with discs I would even consider it on some of my bikes.
If they made compatible touring forks with discs I would even consider it on some of my bikes.
#9
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 451
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 236 Post(s)
Liked 171 Times
in
104 Posts
Hi,
I just came across a NOS 1999 Team Miyata in my size and I'm buying it!! I could go on and on about how excited I am, but there is one piece I'm not thrilled about. The Team Miyata from that year has an aluminum fork. I'm sure some might feel it's lame to think about switching it out for steel or carbon, but it's crossed my mind. So, what would you do?
I just came across a NOS 1999 Team Miyata in my size and I'm buying it!! I could go on and on about how excited I am, but there is one piece I'm not thrilled about. The Team Miyata from that year has an aluminum fork. I'm sure some might feel it's lame to think about switching it out for steel or carbon, but it's crossed my mind. So, what would you do?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 656 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,049 Times
in
1,884 Posts
Agreed, you really should ride them for an extended period of time to see if you like them. They appear to be from Tange's Fusion series.
#11
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Seattle
Posts: 389
Bikes: Davidson ’81
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 233 Times
in
122 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
WHat exactly is your concern? Miyata is/was a reputable and highly regarded builder who sold many thousands of bikes. What makes you think they made a mistake on this bike?
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: New York City
Posts: 141
Bikes: 1991 Diamondback Interval TG
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Just don't see much aluminum on road bike forks is all. Based on steel and carbon fiber being used so much more I tend to think they're better for the task, but I'm no expert on this.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 669
Bikes: Especialy Alan, but also Empella, Cascarsi, Gazelle, Bianchi, CJV, Sirocco, Berkers etcetera
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 188 Post(s)
Liked 997 Times
in
355 Posts
Suddenly I had this thought...., maybe heard about 'the death fork'? In that case, do not worry. Only Viscount and Lambert had these, for a short time.
Last edited by fabiofarelli; 04-19-21 at 09:45 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
Bikes were primarily steel from ~1880-1995 or so. THis was just the traditional method for constructing frames and forks. By 2000 or so, steel was much less common and Aluminum was more popular in frames and forks, but not long after, carbon forks became the standard. I think this was as much of a marketing decision as anything else - a carbon fibre fork on an otherwise mundane bike seems like an upgrade. The truth was, however, that many carbon forks only had the mid part of the legs made from carbon and the rest of the fork - steerer, crown, top part of legs, and dropouts, were aluminum.
#17
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 451
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 236 Post(s)
Liked 171 Times
in
104 Posts
Yep, you definitely have a '93. Very nice Miyata 'STB' tubing with, unfortunately, a crappy aluminum fork that Miyata switched to in the early 90s to save money. Personally I'd try to find a late 80s/early 90s Japanese steel fork to replace it with. You can find out what they looked like in the late 80s miyata catalogs.
#18
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,439
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 1,304 Times
in
708 Posts
Here is the 1993 Koga-Miyata FullPro which, if I'm not mistaken, is basically the same frame. That year came with an Alfrex Alloy 6000 A.P.A. bonded fork with partial polishing.
The scan seam is unfortunately right around the top of the fork but the similar models all have the same fork and look exactly like yours.
Pretty sweet splined triple butted chromoly frames and probably came with 8-speed Dura Ace groupset.
Check out the Koga-Miyata thread for more info and specs.
Now that I have read about the bonded fork I am even more inclined to replace it. It was a cool technology but after almost 30 years that epoxy can have a tendency to fail.
Pretty sweet effect with the polished and clear coated aluminum though. Looks a lot like chrome socks.
The scan seam is unfortunately right around the top of the fork but the similar models all have the same fork and look exactly like yours.
Pretty sweet splined triple butted chromoly frames and probably came with 8-speed Dura Ace groupset.
Check out the Koga-Miyata thread for more info and specs.
Now that I have read about the bonded fork I am even more inclined to replace it. It was a cool technology but after almost 30 years that epoxy can have a tendency to fail.
Pretty sweet effect with the polished and clear coated aluminum though. Looks a lot like chrome socks.
Last edited by JaccoW; 04-19-21 at 10:22 AM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,779
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1643 Post(s)
Liked 2,746 Times
in
1,275 Posts
A lot of the bikes were using aluminum forks in the early 90's. Maybe people just didn't trust the carbon option? I wouldn't hesitate putting one on.
#20
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,439
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 1,304 Times
in
708 Posts
The fork on this Miyata is very likely a bonded aluminum fork. At the very least I would suggest checking the sharp edges for cracks in the paint, which can indicate the epoxy failing.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 656 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,049 Times
in
1,884 Posts
This definitely isn't 1989, as it has the fastback stays and vertical dropouts that first appeared circa 1993. Miyata was definitely still in business in 1999, though they had closed their USA sales/distribution division by that time. We still had them in Canada in 1999 and they were also available in Europe (as Koga-Miyata). There may have have been some USA dealers that were independently importing Miyata.
#22
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,222
Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.
Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1574 Post(s)
Liked 1,317 Times
in
877 Posts
I've never seen any statistics suggesting that bonded forks from Tange (I believe the world's largest and most-trusted fork manufacturer for many years) were less reliable than steel forks.
And I've heard of no tendency for good bonded frames/forks from the early 90's to suffer higher rates of failure than steel.
I've re-bent crashed aluminum forks and can tell you that they were very strong in terms of the force required to re-bend(!!!), and that no failure of bonding ensued.
Just like forks made from steel or from carbon or from carbon/aluminum, a fork can be made more or less noodly than an average fork.
Aluminum forks saved about a half-pound in most cases versus a steel fork, hence their popularity!
Miyata certainly knew what they were doing when it came to making quality frames/bicycles, made rather few mistakes over the years though I seem to be recalling one early-90's model, a few of which suffered top tube failure at the rear cable port(?).
And I've heard of no tendency for good bonded frames/forks from the early 90's to suffer higher rates of failure than steel.
I've re-bent crashed aluminum forks and can tell you that they were very strong in terms of the force required to re-bend(!!!), and that no failure of bonding ensued.
Just like forks made from steel or from carbon or from carbon/aluminum, a fork can be made more or less noodly than an average fork.
Aluminum forks saved about a half-pound in most cases versus a steel fork, hence their popularity!
Miyata certainly knew what they were doing when it came to making quality frames/bicycles, made rather few mistakes over the years though I seem to be recalling one early-90's model, a few of which suffered top tube failure at the rear cable port(?).
Likes For dddd:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,266
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,207 Times
in
703 Posts
OP -- yes, just ride it and see what you think first. I've fallen victim to upgrade fever before, but you're starting out with an excellent bike, so I would start with the bike as designed first.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,542
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1649 Post(s)
Liked 1,872 Times
in
1,040 Posts
I replaced the aluminum fork on my Performance Focus bike with a carbon fork, and it improved the ride significantly.
Having said that, I think the first thing to try would be to switch to 28mm tires (or whatever widest tire will fit in the frame). That will probably soften the ride enough to make it acceptable. CF seatpost and handlebars also help soften the ride.
Having said that, I think the first thing to try would be to switch to 28mm tires (or whatever widest tire will fit in the frame). That will probably soften the ride enough to make it acceptable. CF seatpost and handlebars also help soften the ride.
#25
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,439
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 1,304 Times
in
708 Posts
I've never seen any statistics suggesting that bonded forks from Tange (I believe the world's largest and most-trusted fork manufacturer for many years) were less reliable than steel forks.
And I've heard of no tendency for good bonded frames/forks from the early 90's to suffer higher rates of failure than steel.
I've re-bent crashed aluminum forks and can tell you that they were very strong in terms of the force required to re-bend(!!!), and that no failure of bonding ensued.
And I've heard of no tendency for good bonded frames/forks from the early 90's to suffer higher rates of failure than steel.
I've re-bent crashed aluminum forks and can tell you that they were very strong in terms of the force required to re-bend(!!!), and that no failure of bonding ensued.
Then again, that's on the frames with carbon/titanium tubing in cast aluminum lugs. The different materials almost always mean some oxidation occurs over time and the frame fails. It's usually the aluminum. Technically the epoxy isn't the bit that fails. It's the layer underneath that it is bonded to.
I think aluminum is a wonderful material but I have broken enough aluminum parts that I am wary about it in certain applications and I sure as hell wouldn't bend it back.
I have had handlebars, cranks and forks fail suddenly without warning. Fortunately the crank was the only one that failed catastrophically but even that one nearly killed me. The handlebar just folded over when I pulled my bike from the rack and I noticed my fork was broken when my wheeel was at a weird angle when I stopped at a traffic light.
Anyway, I am going off-topic.
OP check the fork for frame damage. If it's clear it will probably be a wonderful ride. Otherwise there are tons of excellent options for carbon forks and from what I've heard