Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Record hubs?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Record hubs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-21 | 11:04 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 114
Likes: 20
Record hubs?

Good day, I am rebuilding, general clean and polish, a set of 6 speed 36 hole record hubs. Is, are there, any upgraded bearings that we use? I thought I read somewhere something about bearing upgrade. Best Robert;
road195 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 11:29 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 159
Likes: 34

Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium

Could you post a picture?

If you are talking about 1970s/1980s Record hubs (as used with the Nuovo Record and Super Record gruppos), most (not all!) of them use 3/16 balls on the front hub and 4/16 balls on the rear. Grade is G 25, I think.
Nuovo Record is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 11:37 AM
  #3  
steelbikeguy's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,305
Likes: 4,801
From: Peoria, IL
Originally Posted by road195
..... Is, are there, any upgraded bearings that we use? I thought I read somewhere something about bearing upgrade. Best Robert;
you may be thinking of ceramic bearings, but these don't have any practical value for bikes. Grade 25 steel bearings are the standard and plenty good.

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 11:48 AM
  #4  
bulgie's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 5,487
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by Nuovo Record
Could you post a picture?

If you are talking about 1970s/1980s Record hubs (as used with the Nuovo Record and Super Record gruppos), most (not all!) of them use 3/16 balls on the front hub and 4/16 balls on the rear. Grade is G 25, I think.
Old Record hubs used 7/32" in front, not 3/16".

Nuovo Tipo (usually called just Tipo for short) used 3/16"

Both models used 1/4" in back.

The original Campy bearings might be even finer than grade 25, though I agree grade 25 is good enough.

With most used hubs of unknown provenance, you don't know what balls may have been swapped in over the years, so I wouldn't fret over rescuing the original Campy balls which are likely long gone. Just get grade 25 steel and be happy.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 12:10 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 159
Likes: 34

Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium

Originally Posted by bulgie
Old Record hubs used 7/32" in front, not 3/16".
Mark is right, I was wrong. Sorry.
Nuovo Record is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 12:53 PM
  #6  
Pedal to the medal
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 330
From: The Arsenal of Democracy

Bikes: 1991 Team Miyata Track, 1992 Lemond Alpe d'Huez, 19?? Schwinn High Serra, 1982 Trek 614, 198X Raleigh Alyeska

Originally Posted by bulgie
Old Record hubs used 7/32" in front, not 3/16".
Nuovo Tipo (usually called just Tipo for short) used 3/16"
Both models used 1/4" in back.
Mark B
What's the rationale for using different-sized balls in the front and back?
romperrr is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 01:26 PM
  #7  
Narhay's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,699
Likes: 581
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Originally Posted by romperrr
What's the rationale for using different-sized balls in the front and back?
Different sized axle, less weight required on the front. I'm not sure to be honest.
Narhay is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 01:46 PM
  #8  
Ex Pres's Avatar
Cat 6
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,522
Likes: 236
From: Mountain Brook, AL
Back in the 70s [I've read] Campy ball bearings were only Grade 100, so 25 is plenty good. Though you can find grade 10 balls at a reasonable price. I use G10.
Ex Pres is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 03:07 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 114
Likes: 20
Okay I will take apart identity the bearings and repack, polish up and get two next step. Thanks
road195 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 03:08 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Titanium Club Membership
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 114
Likes: 20
I will have to get a picture later, just received in post today
road195 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 03:54 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 159
Likes: 34

Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium

Originally Posted by Ex Pres
Back in the 70s [I've read] Campy ball bearings were only Grade 100, so 25 is plenty good. Though you can find grade 10 balls at a reasonable price. I use G10.
What does it mean in regard to the cone surfaces if you use balls of a different grade?
Nuovo Record is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 03:58 PM
  #12  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 5,235
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by Nuovo Record
If you are talking about 1970s/1980s Record hubs (as used with the Nuovo Record and Super Record gruppos), most (not all!) of them use 3/16 balls on the front hub and 4/16 balls on the rear. Grade is G 25, I think.
Grade 25 is the proper grade for replacement balls. Record rear hubs take nine 1/4" balls on each side; Record front hubs take nine 7/32" balls on each side.

Gran Sport ("Tipo") hubs use nine 1/4" balls on each side for the rear, and ten 3/16" balls on each side for the front.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 04:01 PM
  #13  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 5,235
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by romperrr
What's the rationale for using different-sized balls in the front and back?
The rear hub carries more load, so larger balls are used. Record hubs were used for professional racing, thus less tolerant of failure, so the front hub uses larger balls than other front hubs.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 04:05 PM
  #14  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 5,235
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by Nuovo Record
What does it mean in regard to the cone surfaces if you use balls of a different grade?
Nothing, really. As long as you use the proper diameter ball, the cone will be happy. A grade 25 ball will (in principle, at least) be slightly closer tolerance for roundness and therefore run smoother than a grade 100 ball. And grade 25 balls aren't that much more expensive than grade 100 balls.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 04:06 PM
  #15  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 159
Likes: 34

Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Record rear hubs take nine 1/4" balls on each side; Record front hubs take nine 7/32" balls on each side.
I am thinking of "Record S-U" hubs as the last evolutionary step of 1980s Record hubs (before C-Record), with both front and rear hubs using 7/32 balls. Am I very much mistaken?

Oh, and C-Record hubs use 7/32 balls on both front and rear, right...?

How about Triomphe?

Last edited by Nuovo Record; 06-23-21 at 04:12 PM.
Nuovo Record is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 04:34 PM
  #16  
Pedal to the medal
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 330
From: The Arsenal of Democracy

Bikes: 1991 Team Miyata Track, 1992 Lemond Alpe d'Huez, 19?? Schwinn High Serra, 1982 Trek 614, 198X Raleigh Alyeska

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
The rear hub carries more load, so larger balls are used. Record hubs were used for professional racing, thus less tolerant of failure, so the front hub uses larger balls than other front hubs.
Thanks for the feedback. Why not just use large balls for both the front and rear then?

Obligatory AC/DC reference:
romperrr is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 04:37 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,804
Likes: 3,707
Ceramicspeed.

just Spin baby
repechage is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 04:54 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 159
Likes: 34

Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium

Thanks for that, but I don´t find velobase too reliable a source.
Nuovo Record is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 05:24 PM
  #19  
jethin's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 379
I wish someone had a definitive answer to the grade of Campy bearings in these hubs. Not that it matters much, but I’ve read comments ranging from just ok to very high quality.
jethin is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 05:25 PM
  #20  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,324
Likes: 5,235
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by Nuovo Record
I am thinking of "Record S-U" hubs as the last evolutionary step of 1980s Record hubs (before C-Record), with both front and rear hubs using 7/32 balls. Am I very much mistaken? Oh, and C-Record hubs use 7/32 balls on both front and rear, right...? How about Triomphe?

According to Sutherland's 6th Edition, the "S - U" Record hubs use nine 7/32" balls in each front race, and C-Record uses ten 3/16" balls in each front race. Triomphe and Victory hubs were cosmetic variations on Gran Sport ("Tipo") hubs and used nine 1/4" balls in each rear race and ten 3/16" balls in each front race. AFAIK, all Campagnolo rear hubs used nine 1/4" balls in each race, including the "S - U" and C-Record versions.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
s-u-hubs.jpg (80.3 KB, 62 views)
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 05:28 PM
  #21  
P!N20's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 2,393
From: Wurundjeri Country
Originally Posted by romperrr
What's the rationale for using different-sized balls in the front and back?
Just to annoy us.
P!N20 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 06:04 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,959
Likes: 2,139
From: Evanston, IL

Bikes: many

I have heard of people switching out the cup-and-cone setup with cartridge bearings. I have no idea how much (if any) machining is required, what specific parts are required for the conversion, or if the conversion is actually an improvement. Something to poke around the net during your morning coffee time.
__________________
My bikes
smontanaro is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 07:01 PM
  #23  
bulgie's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 5,487
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by smontanaro
I have heard of people switching out the cup-and-cone setup with cartridge bearings.
No idea how much of a factor this is, but angular-contact cup/cone bearings are more tolerant of misalignment, like you'll get when the axle flexes. We know axles flex in use, a little bit all the time from holding up your weight, but a lot more when hitting bumps. My guess is this flex is what causes axles to break in fatigue.

Is it enough to cause problems with annular cartridge bearings? I dunno. A few brands of hubs came with the same small (10 mm) axles and cartridge bearings; Omas and Avocet come to mind. But most of the cartridge bearing hubs that are known for durability had larger stiffer axles, like Phil Wood, Mavic, Bullseye, Hi-E. Oh I just remembered, Mavic had special angular-contact cartridge bearings so they were adjustable. Maybe cartridges like that are available with a 10 mm ID? Oh right, there's also Maxicar, which used angular-contact cartridges, but not sealed. (The hubs had a labyrinth seal that was not part of the bearing.) I have heard those called "magneto bearings" so maybe they're a stock item.

If you succeed in making the sealed-cartridge conversion, you would get a hub that needs less maintenance, and that might be worth it right there even if the bearings are sub-optimal.

Note, if you get cartridges with a nominal 10 mm ID, they will be a loose fit on a 10 mm axle, because the tops of the threads measure somewhat less than 10 mm. Those Omas and Avocet hubs had "lands" on the axles where the bearings pressed on, sized to be a light press fit on the bearings. That would be hard to achieve with an existing axle, so you might have to make your own. The gap is too small to shim, I think. Without the lands, there will be slop between the axle and bearing that you can't adjust out. Maybe there is some bearing with a slightly smaller ID, sized to be snug on a nominal 10 mm thread?

This is mostly armchair theorizing. I did replace the axle on an Avocet cartridge hub once, using a normal 10 mm axle without lands, and I couldn't get rid of the slop, but I just rode it anyway — it was a junker bike.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Reply
Old 06-23-21 | 08:17 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 159
Likes: 34

Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
According to Sutherland's 6th Edition, the "S - U" Record hubs use nine 7/32" balls in each front race, and C-Record uses ten 3/16" balls in each front race. Triomphe and Victory hubs were cosmetic variations on Gran Sport ("Tipo") hubs and used nine 1/4" balls in each rear race and ten 3/16" balls in each front race. AFAIK, all Campagnolo rear hubs used nine 1/4" balls in each race, including the "S - U" and C-Record versions.
Velobase has
Triomphe with: "Front Bearing Size/Count 3/16" 9x9"
Victory with: "Front Bearing Size/Count 3/16" 10 x 10"
C-Record with "Front Bearing Size/Count 3/16" 9x9"

The ball sizes match.
Nuovo Record is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.