![]() |
Originally Posted by Mr. 66
(Post 22447031)
Swampy, double check your rear wheel. It does not look properly seated in the claw and dropouts in the picture posted.
|
Originally Posted by repechage
(Post 22446457)
Top tube length and handlebar position also play a roll.
when I was young and 5'-7" I bought a 59 ctt framed bike, everyone thought I would grow... I did but not eneough. I sold it off for. 56 cm ctt frame when I was 5'-9". I gained some height but gravity struck back. I still have that 56cm bike but truthfully it is now a tad long. if I wanted my bars level with the saddle a 58-59 cm would work. but most often those bikes have a top tube too long. I am not discussing seat tube angle or as some note "setback". I think the Dawes is on the middle- longer side. a 22.5" top tube might be what it has, if so, can be made to work with a shorter stem. consider what you need and go from there. Dawes I think went 19, 21, 23... maybe even add a 1/2" to each size. Sometimes even the 21" frames had long top tubes... easier to avoid toe clip overlap. |
Yes fully seated in the claw, the non drive is not at a fixed point, unless you have a dropout stop on there. I may have one that I can picture. They work good for bikes with the claw for wheel install.
|
I've been looking at slightly more modern road bikes that i can more easily change gearing on. Found a nice 90s Raleigh Super Course for $100.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...edbe3156d.jpeg The seller didn't know what frame size it is so he sent me pics showing measurement 33" from ground to top bar, same as my Dawes. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...fc4adc5d6.jpeg Although I'm keeping the Dawes, I'll probably hold out for a smaller frame for my next bike. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.