Tire width and rolling resistance.
#26
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,355
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3910 Post(s)
Liked 4,866 Times
in
2,245 Posts
What if it is a pavement Model T and you want narrower whitewalls, era appropriate?
Clinchers on a classic racer? Those original rims?
edit: I did see a close-out sale recently on 20s, but forget the tread or sidewall details.
Try the 'Want to Trade' thread.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Last edited by Wildwood; 04-21-22 at 12:41 PM.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,752
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3236 Post(s)
Liked 3,883 Times
in
1,443 Posts
https://www.renehersecycles.com/aero...orld-bicycles/
From the article: "And what about those wide tires? The data showed a very slight increase in air resistance when going from 25 to 32 mm tires, but the difference was too small to be statistically significant. It may be real, or it may just be in the noise of the data collection. In any case, it’s smaller than many other factors, such as your stem height or the clothes you wear."
Regarding the clothes you wear: "The difference between a close-fitting jacket and a looser cycling jacket is a full 8% increase in the overall wind resistance of your bike!" I've also found this to be true in a very unscientific test I conducted several years back. I live on a steep hill, and I had the idea that I could compare the rolling resistance of various tires by picking a starting point, letting myself coast from that point, and recording my max speed when I got to the bottom of the hill. What I found was that whether or not I was wearing a jacket was the only thing that made a reliable difference. With different tires and the same clothes, the max speed was typically less than 0.5 mph different and not repeatable. Wearing a jacket reduced my max speed by around 5 mph. I started out thinking I had a way to measure rolling resistance, but it turned out I was measuring aerodynamic drag. I should repeat this experiment with wide and skinny tires.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K:
#28
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 6,001
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1957 Post(s)
Liked 3,664 Times
in
1,682 Posts
I just found something. It doesn't cover 42mm tires, but it's a start.
https://www.renehersecycles.com/aero...orld-bicycles/
From the article: "And what about those wide tires? The data showed a very slight increase in air resistance when going from 25 to 32 mm tires, but the difference was too small to be statistically significant. It may be real, or it may just be in the noise of the data collection. In any case, it’s smaller than many other factors, such as your stem height or the clothes you wear."
Regarding the clothes you wear: "The difference between a close-fitting jacket and a looser cycling jacket is a full 8% increase in the overall wind resistance of your bike!" I've also found this to be true in a very unscientific test I conducted several years back. I live on a steep hill, and I had the idea that I could compare the rolling resistance of various tires by picking a starting point, letting myself coast from that point, and recording my max speed when I got to the bottom of the hill. What I found was that whether or not I was wearing a jacket was the only thing that made a reliable difference. With different tires and the same clothes, the max speed was typically less than 0.5 mph different and not repeatable. Wearing a jacket reduced my max speed by around 5 mph. I started out thinking I had a way to measure rolling resistance, but it turned out I was measuring aerodynamic drag. I should repeat this experiment with wide and skinny tires.
https://www.renehersecycles.com/aero...orld-bicycles/
From the article: "And what about those wide tires? The data showed a very slight increase in air resistance when going from 25 to 32 mm tires, but the difference was too small to be statistically significant. It may be real, or it may just be in the noise of the data collection. In any case, it’s smaller than many other factors, such as your stem height or the clothes you wear."
Regarding the clothes you wear: "The difference between a close-fitting jacket and a looser cycling jacket is a full 8% increase in the overall wind resistance of your bike!" I've also found this to be true in a very unscientific test I conducted several years back. I live on a steep hill, and I had the idea that I could compare the rolling resistance of various tires by picking a starting point, letting myself coast from that point, and recording my max speed when I got to the bottom of the hill. What I found was that whether or not I was wearing a jacket was the only thing that made a reliable difference. With different tires and the same clothes, the max speed was typically less than 0.5 mph different and not repeatable. Wearing a jacket reduced my max speed by around 5 mph. I started out thinking I had a way to measure rolling resistance, but it turned out I was measuring aerodynamic drag. I should repeat this experiment with wide and skinny tires.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,877
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3566 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,806 Posts
... the operative word being 'should'.
What if it is a pavement Model T and you want narrower whitewalls, era appropriate?
Clinchers on a classic racer? Those original rims?
edit: I did see a close-out sale recently on 20s, but forget the tread or sidewall details.
Try the 'Want to Trade' thread.
What if it is a pavement Model T and you want narrower whitewalls, era appropriate?
Clinchers on a classic racer? Those original rims?
edit: I did see a close-out sale recently on 20s, but forget the tread or sidewall details.
Try the 'Want to Trade' thread.
And yes, they're original rims.
#30
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,631
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,572 Times
in
1,579 Posts
The "Duro" brand appears to still make 700x20C tires: https://www.duro.com.tw/en/product/b...01a057b88e9f9/
At least many companies are still making 23s. Maybe if you searched for the absolute lightest ones, you might find a company that's undersizing them to hit that goal.
At least many companies are still making 23s. Maybe if you searched for the absolute lightest ones, you might find a company that's undersizing them to hit that goal.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#31
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
336 Posts
I've had some (a shop gave them to me after the customer brought them back).
Very hard, very fast (seemed, anyway).
I also have ridden Panaracer Tecnova II 700x19's that had raised lettering stating 700x18. Nearly slicks.
Very hard, seemed fast, but my C&V wheels went out of true after 3-4 rides. Repeatedly, until I swapped tires for 23's.
I then tried Tufo 700x20 clinching tubulars. Hard, but sluggish. Tire construction had to have played a part in that.
All the research aside, riding skinnies at high psi just seems.... efficient.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,877
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3566 Post(s)
Liked 2,984 Times
in
1,806 Posts
The "Duro" brand appears to still make 700x20C tires: https://www.duro.com.tw/en/product/b...01a057b88e9f9/
At least many companies are still making 23s. Maybe if you searched for the absolute lightest ones, you might find a company that's undersizing them to hit that goal.
At least many companies are still making 23s. Maybe if you searched for the absolute lightest ones, you might find a company that's undersizing them to hit that goal.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,525
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 989 Post(s)
Liked 1,657 Times
in
1,063 Posts
Anybody headed back to Sew Ups... Most likely... NOT...
Edit: Maybe??? ...Ha
Edit: Maybe??? ...Ha
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
Last edited by zandoval; 04-22-22 at 11:48 AM.
#35
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,658
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3914 Post(s)
Liked 6,526 Times
in
3,237 Posts
Likes For SurferRosa:
#36
Senior Member
What was of interest to me, was the rolling resistance difference between latex and butyl tubes - latex was a lot lower than butyl.
Now, think of the extra time spent pumping them up before every single ride. Remember also, the time and energy lost when you get a flat and have to stop and patch them (and reinflate them).
NOTHING is slower than a tire that leaves you by the side of the road fixing a flat.
Now, think of the extra time spent pumping them up before every single ride. Remember also, the time and energy lost when you get a flat and have to stop and patch them (and reinflate them).
NOTHING is slower than a tire that leaves you by the side of the road fixing a flat.
Likes For Bad Lag:
#37
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,355
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3910 Post(s)
Liked 4,866 Times
in
2,245 Posts
They are getting cheaper than tubeless ready tires, lighter wheels, so yes = a continuing tubular tire user. I may switch to tape instead of glue.
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Likes For Wildwood:
#38
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,658
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3914 Post(s)
Liked 6,526 Times
in
3,237 Posts
Likes For SurferRosa:
#39
Senior Member
What was of interest to me, was the rolling resistance difference between latex and butyl tubes - latex was a lot lower than butyl.
Now, think of the extra time spent pumping them up before every single ride. Remember also, the time and energy lost when you get a flat and have to stop and patch them (and reinflate them).
Now, think of the extra time spent pumping them up before every single ride. Remember also, the time and energy lost when you get a flat and have to stop and patch them (and reinflate them).
Likes For HTupolev:
#40
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,532
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2751 Post(s)
Liked 3,409 Times
in
2,064 Posts
Likes For dedhed:
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,955
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4847 Post(s)
Liked 3,978 Times
in
2,584 Posts
...
For a purely gravel ride the tire width should be commensurate with the size of the gravel, regardless of the rolling resistance. Right? Like riding over the underdeveloped road to the Oregon Coast??? If I remember the thread the best tire size for the worst section would have been 3" fat bike tires. Not the whole route by even a tiny fraction, but on a 100mi road route with some light packed gravel for 5mi = Do you ride 44mm tires or 28s? No right or wrong, just preference.
...
For a purely gravel ride the tire width should be commensurate with the size of the gravel, regardless of the rolling resistance. Right? Like riding over the underdeveloped road to the Oregon Coast??? If I remember the thread the best tire size for the worst section would have been 3" fat bike tires. Not the whole route by even a tiny fraction, but on a 100mi road route with some light packed gravel for 5mi = Do you ride 44mm tires or 28s? No right or wrong, just preference.
...
I also had a frame pump (that got damaged when I lent it to someone else for his umpteenth flat). Used it to top off when I hit the pavement west of the logging roads. Never used a gauge but I was running probably 60-70 on the pavement and maybe less than 30 in front on the logging roads.
So, for me, a 90 mile day and if I were to do it again, I'd use the same tires. (Well, if Vittoria made a G+ version of 38s and 35s and someone else paid for them, I'd step up.)
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,884
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2354 Post(s)
Liked 2,870 Times
in
1,563 Posts
I use both and in a current build my tubular set is going to be the more durable wheelset and tires
Considering all the issues I see on mechanics forum with tubeless and issues if you do flat on the road and sealant or plugs don't work, i truly don't see why more people don't go tubular, which are really not that hard at all to deal with
Considering all the issues I see on mechanics forum with tubeless and issues if you do flat on the road and sealant or plugs don't work, i truly don't see why more people don't go tubular, which are really not that hard at all to deal with
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,955
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4847 Post(s)
Liked 3,978 Times
in
2,584 Posts
Not there yet but I'm stockpiling rims. When my current rims die (maybe sooner as I run out of my Clincher stash), my wheels are getting re-laced with sewup rims. The workhorse rims, Mavic 400+g with 300g sewups for all-purpose use, lighter of both when I want to have fun. Now my driving reason isn't either flats or rolling resistance/weight/speed but the wonderful resistance of well glued sewups from coming off rims. I've had a clincher come off at 25 mph. Injury-wise, a top 5er. I now cannot clear the "what if" from my mind on high speed descents. Takes a lot of the joy out of riding hills.
I downplay speed but - that bike in my avatar is just crying for wheels like I raced 45 years ago. Put a fully race worthy deep V aero rim in back, a 330g in front and 200g Corsas and that bike will be in ecstacy. Same rims and 250-270g road tires (modern equivs to Clement silks, Criterium and Paris-Roubaix) and I get to have fun in the hills and mountain descents!
I downplay speed but - that bike in my avatar is just crying for wheels like I raced 45 years ago. Put a fully race worthy deep V aero rim in back, a 330g in front and 200g Corsas and that bike will be in ecstacy. Same rims and 250-270g road tires (modern equivs to Clement silks, Criterium and Paris-Roubaix) and I get to have fun in the hills and mountain descents!
#44
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,355
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3910 Post(s)
Liked 4,866 Times
in
2,245 Posts
Rarely, but it happens. Most are slow leaks found the day after a ride. I am regularly on 2 major traffic roads with all manner of debris. (Issaquah-Hobart Rd, Coal Creek Pkwy)
1. I do not ride 'tough' gravel roads (but I do have a set of 33mm cyclocross, in case)
2. I invest in good tires on all the bikes
3. I try to ride bikes in rotation, so minimal miles per tire, compared to many.
4. I visually check tires, sometimes rinsing/wiping them after a gritty/glassy ride (and brake rims)
5. Lucky, but always prepared. (Hehehe, there is a weird sense of something when wearing the 2nd tubular spare around shoulders)
edit: yes (again) on future tubular use.
1. I do not ride 'tough' gravel roads (but I do have a set of 33mm cyclocross, in case)
2. I invest in good tires on all the bikes
3. I try to ride bikes in rotation, so minimal miles per tire, compared to many.
4. I visually check tires, sometimes rinsing/wiping them after a gritty/glassy ride (and brake rims)
5. Lucky, but always prepared. (Hehehe, there is a weird sense of something when wearing the 2nd tubular spare around shoulders)
edit: yes (again) on future tubular use.
Last edited by Wildwood; 04-22-22 at 02:37 PM.
Likes For Wildwood:
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,752
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3236 Post(s)
Liked 3,883 Times
in
1,443 Posts
Even if the century doesn't actually take longer with the Marathon Plus, it will definitely feel longer.
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
Likes For Andy_K:
#46
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 582 Times
in
336 Posts
1-Tape makes them easier.
2-Excellent wheels are often cheap, used, like Zipp 404’s for $300, with Campy hubs even cheaper.
3-Better luck with flats, in general.
I’m 1 for 3 with tubeless, so the jury is still out.
Likes For bamboobike4:
Likes For bamboobike4:
#49
Senior Member
Even within a single type of road bed, the surface condition is important - the level of maintenance and debris/litter/broken glass is a factor; or the size and sharpness of the gravel; whether the blacktop is smooth or rough and gravely.
I gave up on sew ups when living in New York City - the roads had too much broken glass and a single spare was not enough. I also tired of fixing flats in sew ups. I gave up on latex tubes again just recently when each tube flatted, more or less spontaneously (not punctured). I'm quite good at fixing flats (fast) but prefer to not do it.
I have developed a tried and true set up for my area and conditions that does not flat very often. I'm not saying it a slow, ponderous set, either, I believe it is quite slick and I can go for years without a flat.
To me, that outweighs any rolling resistance argument "by miles".
Last edited by Bad Lag; 04-23-22 at 10:46 AM.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,897
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1866 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
507 Posts
I knew my project to buy a set of used car tires would help my cycling!
Likes For Road Fan: