Bike sizing question
#1
Thread Starter
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 210
Likes: 96
Bike sizing question
Browsing Marketplace I see this old Bridgestone BB-1for a decent price. Says it's 17" frame. Seems they use inches for MTB sizing and it always confuses me. This bike looks fairly small right? Looking to build out something new for the wife who's about 5'3" with shorter legs. It has 26" wheels. Getting confusing info on 17" sized bikes. Any thoughts?
#2
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,212
Likes: 3,123
The BB--1 was Bridgestone'seconomy version of their CB city bike series. It was introduced in 1992. I'm assuming the 17" dimension is the seller's measurement as Bridgestone literature shows frame sizes in centimetres. Here's a link to the 1992 catalogue, which has geomtery charts for the BB-1. They're even kind enough to include standover heights.
https://sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/1992/1992.pdf
https://sheldonbrown.com/bridgestone/1992/1992.pdf
#3
Thrifty Bill

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23,645
Likes: 1,109
From: Mans of NC & SW UT Desert
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
17" is on the big side for someone 5-3 with short legs. I have a couple of bikes for my 5-3 wife (who does not have short legs). One is 15 inch, the other is 14 1/2 inches. Both are MTBs. a Paramount Series 70 and a 1994 Trek 950.
Last edited by wrk101; 05-23-22 at 11:37 AM.





