Rockhopper VS Hardrock
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 753
Rockhopper VS Hardrock
I have been considering building a light ATB type bike out of a 90's MTB frame. I have been looking for something all aluminum in my 23" frame size but nothing has surfaced in a while. I found a Specialized Hardrock non suspension all steel frame from the 90's in my size for $125 locally. It has been kept in the dry and the frame looks pretty good. I had originally thought a Rockhopper had a better frame, but I might get this Hardrock if there isn't that much difference in the frames.
#2
Full Member
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 471
Likes: 454
From: Dickinson, ND
Bikes: Some old ones and some new ones
There were many different levels of Rockhoppers and Hardrocks back then; if it's a 'base' Rockhopper then the frame won't be much different than one of the upper-end Hardrocks. Do you know what level of Hardrock you're looking at? Also pictures would be helpful so we can help you identify the model and frame tubing.
#3
Senior Member


Joined: May 2008
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 2,762
From: Fredericksburg, Va
Bikes: ? Proteous, '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, 'Litespeed Catalyst'94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster
There is a difference. Some early rockhoppers have triple butted frames. I think the Hardrock was at or near the bottom.
I would hold off. But that's just me.
I would hold off. But that's just me.
__________________
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
Bikes don't stand alone. They are two tired.
#5
Amateur Member

Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 5,253
Likes: 8,721
From: SoCal
Bikes: Cuevas & Cimmaron are my full time riders, small MB-3 and large Competition GS are my sometimers
The Hardrock is below the Rockhopper in the line up, at least some years it is straight gauge Cro-mo tubing when the Rockhopper is double butted. There will be a difference in components. I don't know on Specialized specifically (too lazy to check catalogs) but what I have found with older mountain bike is lower end bikes no longer have stainless steel spokes so they rust, as you get farther up the line, not an issue. Edit: Re-read OP, clearly said "frame"
Last edited by SoCaled; 05-15-24 at 05:16 PM.
#7
Happy banana slug

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 2,515
From: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 26L, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
IMO, $125 for a frame is too much if it's not super high end or rare.
The nice thing about HardRocks is that they're the bottom end of a good quality line, and once built up it'll happily take all the abuse you can dish out.
The nice thing about HardRocks is that they're the bottom end of a good quality line, and once built up it'll happily take all the abuse you can dish out.
#8
Dirty Heathen

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 1,046
From: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Spec’s lineup has always been HardRock, RockHopper, Stumpjumper, with the Stumpy at the top.
There’s always been a couple of different “trim levels” of each model, and they’ve used those nameplates for decades, so there’s literally hundreds of different bikes under those three names.
Generally, I’d say that a Hopper would be a better grade frame set than a HardRock of the same year, but you’d have to dig into the specific catalog for the year of the bike you’re looking at.
It may be like Cannondale, where there were only one or two grades of frame, shared among several different models; distinguished by the wheel/fork/component builds.
There’s always been a couple of different “trim levels” of each model, and they’ve used those nameplates for decades, so there’s literally hundreds of different bikes under those three names.
Generally, I’d say that a Hopper would be a better grade frame set than a HardRock of the same year, but you’d have to dig into the specific catalog for the year of the bike you’re looking at.
It may be like Cannondale, where there were only one or two grades of frame, shared among several different models; distinguished by the wheel/fork/component builds.
#9
Full Member
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 471
Likes: 454
From: Dickinson, ND
Bikes: Some old ones and some new ones
Another thing to consider is that -- and this only my opinion -- a steel frame, even the lowliest Hardrock, will have a nicer ride than that aluminum frame you're looking at. Of course on a vintage MTB that's all relative as you can put somewhat fatter modern tires on either and they will have a pretty cushy ride.
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 753
It's a complete bike in good shape for the age. I just meant that I would be changing most parts, so group sets, and such didn't matter to me as much as the frame.
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 753
Another thing to consider is that -- and this only my opinion -- a steel frame, even the lowliest Hardrock, will have a nicer ride than that aluminum frame you're looking at. Of course on a vintage MTB that's all relative as you can put somewhat fatter modern tires on either and they will have a pretty cushy ride.
#12
Dirty Heathen

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 1,046
From: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Another thing to consider is that -- and this only my opinion -- a steel frame, even the lowliest Hardrock, will have a nicer ride than that aluminum frame you're looking at. Of course on a vintage MTB that's all relative as you can put somewhat fatter modern tires on either and they will have a pretty cushy ride.
Mid-1990s I would avoid aluminum unless it’s Cannondale or KLEIN, they were way ahead of the game, most other mfgrs were just making aluminum copies of their price-point steel bikes, just a little bit lighter unless you went way upmarket to something like a Technium or an M2 StumpJumper
I have a Klein Pinnacle with a Spinner fork that is a fantastic rider, and a very capable all-surface bike.
Last edited by Ironfish653; 05-16-24 at 08:04 AM.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 5,093
Likes: 4,590
From: USA - Pittsburgh / Southwest PA
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
if you are building from scratch I would opt for a better frame - consider a Stumpjumper frame over a Rockhopper or Hardrock if you are targeting vintage Specialized steel frame
or other options in higher end steel frames - including Gary Fisher, Schwinn Paramount, and Trek
or other options in higher end steel frames - including Gary Fisher, Schwinn Paramount, and Trek
#14
Senior Member



Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 18,822
Likes: 11,676
Quite a few years back I built up a HardRock as an all-purpose commuter, hauler, beater. It lived for a few years under a tarp in my backyard, which was an interesting experiment in rust. It fulfilled its intent, but it was heavy with a deadened (as opposed to lively) ride. I eventually lent it permanently to a local friend whose commuter had been stolen, and last I heard it had been stolen, too.
#15
Happy banana slug

Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,566
Likes: 2,515
From: Arcata, California, U.S., North America, Earth, Saggitarius Arm, Milky Way
Bikes: 1984 Araya MB 26L, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper Sport, 1993 Hard Rock Ultra, 1994 Trek Multitrack 750, 1995 Trek Singletrack 930
At 5'4" I'm also a big fan of 26" wheels. They fit small frames better and are more nimble than the big wheels.
Last edited by Korina; 05-17-24 at 01:59 PM.




