Klein Quantum - manufacture date?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 910
From: New Zealand
Bikes: 1963? Anquetil , 1973 PX10,1979 PX10,1984 PX10, VITUS 979 PX10DU,1970S ALAN,1985 PSV10,1980s PY10FC,1978 bERTIN,ALAN carbon
Klein Quantum - manufacture date?
Rescued this rather battered , almost fluro green Klein the other day for a few dollars .
Had a quick wander through various places on the internet looking for date info on it .
Appears to be a fairly early frame .
Serial number is under the NDS dropout 30467
the PO has made a mess of the seat post clamping area (trying to use a too small post ) 27.4 appears correct . They used a 27.2
Worst damage was drilling a hole through frame and screwing a self tapper into the seat post
Luckily this came out with very little struggle
Also used a nut and bolt and a bunch of washers in the clamp area
Is there anyone reading this that has a frame with the same seat cluster .
Would like to see some pics so I can figure out what the dingaling PO has done .
Is it just a socket head cap screw into a threaded ear on the NDS side ?
Lastly anybody want to have a stab at the age of the frame ?






Had a quick wander through various places on the internet looking for date info on it .
Appears to be a fairly early frame .
Serial number is under the NDS dropout 30467
the PO has made a mess of the seat post clamping area (trying to use a too small post ) 27.4 appears correct . They used a 27.2
Worst damage was drilling a hole through frame and screwing a self tapper into the seat post
Luckily this came out with very little struggle
Also used a nut and bolt and a bunch of washers in the clamp area
Is there anyone reading this that has a frame with the same seat cluster .
Would like to see some pics so I can figure out what the dingaling PO has done .
Is it just a socket head cap screw into a threaded ear on the NDS side ?
Lastly anybody want to have a stab at the age of the frame ?






#2
Almost certainly one of the many many hundreds imported into NZ by the company I worked for back in the day. NZ was quite probably the highest Klein export market per capita, given its small population, anywhere at the time. Much of the market was for triathletes motivated by the Kiwi glory days of Rick Wells and Erin Baker, world and Ironman champions respectively.
Many reds and blacks, and a few metallics in the late 1980s, followed by neon colours such as this a year or two later. I’d put this one as quite probably 1991, maybe a year earlier or later. Memory fades, but pretty sure the earlier imports had chromed steel Taiwanese forks, with later frames having bonded aluminium such as this. SR Prism perhaps.
Many reds and blacks, and a few metallics in the late 1980s, followed by neon colours such as this a year or two later. I’d put this one as quite probably 1991, maybe a year earlier or later. Memory fades, but pretty sure the earlier imports had chromed steel Taiwanese forks, with later frames having bonded aluminium such as this. SR Prism perhaps.
__________________
Nothing quite says wall hanger like drillium toe straps
Nothing quite says wall hanger like drillium toe straps
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 910
From: New Zealand
Bikes: 1963? Anquetil , 1973 PX10,1979 PX10,1984 PX10, VITUS 979 PX10DU,1970S ALAN,1985 PSV10,1980s PY10FC,1978 bERTIN,ALAN carbon
Hiya , Thanks for that info . Yes I thought the forks looked like the ones I had on a Sakae Litage some time back .
#4
Senior Member


Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 754
From: Kingdom of Hawai'i
Bikes: Peugeot, Legnano, Fuji, Zunow, De Rosa, Miyata, Bianchi, Pinarello, Specialized, Bridgestone, Cinelli, Merckx
Appears to me to be late 80’s or early 90’s, hence the downtube shifter mounts. My ‘84 has the “aero” mount.
Lots of Kleins needing a 27.4 seat pin had 27.2’s shoved in and clamped too tight, should be OK. Just be easy with the ears.
So long as you’re not overly concerned with resale value, this could be a great rider. Build it up and see.
Lots of Kleins needing a 27.4 seat pin had 27.2’s shoved in and clamped too tight, should be OK. Just be easy with the ears.
So long as you’re not overly concerned with resale value, this could be a great rider. Build it up and see.
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 910
From: New Zealand
Bikes: 1963? Anquetil , 1973 PX10,1979 PX10,1984 PX10, VITUS 979 PX10DU,1970S ALAN,1985 PSV10,1980s PY10FC,1978 bERTIN,ALAN carbon
Appears to me to be late 80’s or early 90’s, hence the downtube shifter mounts. My ‘84 has the “aero” mount.
Lots of Kleins needing a 27.4 seat pin had 27.2’s shoved in and clamped too tight, should be OK. Just be easy with the ears.
So long as you’re not overly concerned with resale value, this could be a great rider. Build it up and see.
Lots of Kleins needing a 27.4 seat pin had 27.2’s shoved in and clamped too tight, should be OK. Just be easy with the ears.
So long as you’re not overly concerned with resale value, this could be a great rider. Build it up and see.
Will order a 27.4mm post for it .
Unfortunately it is way too small for me to ride comfortably .
Will have to be a catch and release . Not sure who to yet .
#6
It's MY mountain

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,190
Likes: 4,274
From: Mt.Diablo
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
I stab 1984. Telling are the font, the non-internal brake cable, the non-micro dropouts, the side of the tube shifter boss, and the steel fork. The serial number is not like one I've seen before - in that location they usually start with a letter - like P for Performance. Your fork is also not a design I've seen before.
This is a Team Super 1984 with mostly the same features:
This is a Team Super 1984 with mostly the same features:
#7
Senior Member




Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,387
Likes: 10,140
From: Utah
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#8
OK, made me look!
The number on mine is (logo)-20229
I bought it from the buddy of the original owner (the bike was originally raced on the Helotes bike shop team) and he said it was a '89.
Maybe the last number represents the year, but who knows.

On the seat clamping bolt, mine is a normal stainless Allen socket screw and threads into the far side.
The far side is flush, while yours maybe has something sticking farther out? A heli-coil should work if it's stripped.
The number on mine is (logo)-20229
I bought it from the buddy of the original owner (the bike was originally raced on the Helotes bike shop team) and he said it was a '89.
Maybe the last number represents the year, but who knows.

On the seat clamping bolt, mine is a normal stainless Allen socket screw and threads into the far side.
The far side is flush, while yours maybe has something sticking farther out? A heli-coil should work if it's stripped.
#9
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,630
Likes: 3,542
From: South shore, L.I., NY
Bikes: Trek Emonda SL7, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
I stab 1984. Telling are the font, the non-internal brake cable, the non-micro dropouts, the side of the tube shifter boss, and the steel fork. The serial number is not like one I've seen before - in that location they usually start with a letter - like P for Performance. Your fork is also not a design I've seen before.
This is a Team Super 1984 with mostly the same features:

This is a Team Super 1984 with mostly the same features:

#10
It's MY mountain

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,190
Likes: 4,274
From: Mt.Diablo
Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek
OK, made me look!
The number on mine is (logo)-20229
I bought it from the buddy of the original owner (the bike was originally raced on the Helotes bike shop team) and he said it was a '89.
Maybe the last number represents the year, but who knows.

On the seat clamping bolt, mine is a normal stainless Allen socket screw and threads into the far side.
The far side is flush, while yours maybe has something sticking farther out? A heli-coil should work if it's stripped.
The number on mine is (logo)-20229
I bought it from the buddy of the original owner (the bike was originally raced on the Helotes bike shop team) and he said it was a '89.
Maybe the last number represents the year, but who knows.

On the seat clamping bolt, mine is a normal stainless Allen socket screw and threads into the far side.
The far side is flush, while yours maybe has something sticking farther out? A heli-coil should work if it's stripped.
Somebody in New Zealand send me a photo of their 1986 Quantum with (K)-2Q233... almost twins.

This photo got corrupted in a data loss a few years ago.

#11
Senior Member


Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 754
From: Kingdom of Hawai'i
Bikes: Peugeot, Legnano, Fuji, Zunow, De Rosa, Miyata, Bianchi, Pinarello, Specialized, Bridgestone, Cinelli, Merckx

It might also be useful to check the brake mounts to see if they are recessed or nutted. Earlier models like this had nutted brakes.
#12
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 910
From: New Zealand
Bikes: 1963? Anquetil , 1973 PX10,1979 PX10,1984 PX10, VITUS 979 PX10DU,1970S ALAN,1985 PSV10,1980s PY10FC,1978 bERTIN,ALAN carbon
I will faff about and see if I can clean the thread up enough to work properly
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 910
From: New Zealand
Bikes: 1963? Anquetil , 1973 PX10,1979 PX10,1984 PX10, VITUS 979 PX10DU,1970S ALAN,1985 PSV10,1980s PY10FC,1978 bERTIN,ALAN carbon
#14
Dirty Heathen

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 1,046
From: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
That would put you 1986-87-ish
It's a nice piece; stiff but well -damped, a good match to those crit-style 80s race bikes.
I have one on my 3.0 Cannondale
#15
As shown below, the lateral flexibility of Prism was average among the aluminum, carbon, and steel forks tested, but its forward/backward (longitudinal) flexibility was higher than that of all four steel forks tested.
The Colnago, Merckx, and Paramount steel forks were the stiffest forks tested, both longitudinally and laterally.
Wonder where and how the belief that aluminum forks are inherently uncomfortably stiff arose.
#16
I guess I'll hang with the second owner's remembery.
At least I know that the last number isn't the fab date.
#17
Dirty Heathen

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,324
Likes: 1,046
From: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
I thought I remembered seeing the SR Prism listed among those analyzed in the fork deflection test hosted on the Sheldon Brown website.
As shown below, the lateral flexibility of Prism was average among the aluminum, carbon, and steel forks tested, but its forward/backward (longitudinal) flexibility was higher than that of all four steel forks tested.
The Colnago, Merckx, and Paramount steel forks were the stiffest forks tested, both longitudinally and laterally.
Wonder where and how the belief that aluminum forks are inherently uncomfortably stiff arose.
As shown below, the lateral flexibility of Prism was average among the aluminum, carbon, and steel forks tested, but its forward/backward (longitudinal) flexibility was higher than that of all four steel forks tested.
The Colnago, Merckx, and Paramount steel forks were the stiffest forks tested, both longitudinally and laterally.
Wonder where and how the belief that aluminum forks are inherently uncomfortably stiff arose.
I have the Prism on my 89 Cannondale 3.0 and an 88 Klein with a steel Spinner unicrown.
Both are similar bikes, though the Cannondale has a modern 10-sp build and wheelset.
There’s more bounce or spring in the Spinner than the SR; impacts and road noise on the alloy fork feel more damped than the steel one.
I guess that’s the “lively” ride people attribute to steel.
The Cannondale feels more confident when pushed to “Maximum Attack” on typical city street surfaces, but that may be due to the slightly smaller frame size and modern cockpit layout.







