Frames and Framebuilding (1995) Frame Preparation
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member


Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 5,535
From: Central Florida, USA
Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (7); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Trek (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Quintana Roo (1)
Frames and Framebuilding (1995) Frame Preparation




__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May, Jul, Aug, Oct, 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Dec 1985; Apr 1994; May, Jun 1996; May 1997.
WTB: bicyclist May, Dec 1997: Jun-Dec 1998.
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Litespeed head badge (circa 2000)
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May, Jul, Aug, Oct, 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Dec 1985; Apr 1994; May, Jun 1996; May 1997.
WTB: bicyclist May, Dec 1997: Jun-Dec 1998.
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.
WTB: Litespeed head badge (circa 2000)
#2
Senior Member


Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,609
Likes: 2,477
From: Bastrop Texas
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Nice tools... I dont think I saw any epoxy...
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#3
Man, if I saw someone doing this (below) on a newly-painted frame, I would find a better bike shop.

Filing a chamfer like that will cause a line of rust to appear where the cup meets the face, and the rust will likely propagate under the paint, eventually causing the paint to fail and flake off.
The whole concept of facing a painted frame is flawed. It's almost never necessary, and it causes harm if the frame later gets a Phil Wood or most any other cartridge BB
Even if the paint is thick, it doesn't affect bearing ajustment unless the paint is thick on one side, like a drip or run. Any competent painter can make the paint film be uniform all the way around, so facing after painting is not necessary. Facing should be done before painting, and only before.
But facing by itself isn't as bad as what the guy is doing with the file in the pic above, that's malpractice.

Filing a chamfer like that will cause a line of rust to appear where the cup meets the face, and the rust will likely propagate under the paint, eventually causing the paint to fail and flake off.
The whole concept of facing a painted frame is flawed. It's almost never necessary, and it causes harm if the frame later gets a Phil Wood or most any other cartridge BB
Even if the paint is thick, it doesn't affect bearing ajustment unless the paint is thick on one side, like a drip or run. Any competent painter can make the paint film be uniform all the way around, so facing after painting is not necessary. Facing should be done before painting, and only before.
But facing by itself isn't as bad as what the guy is doing with the file in the pic above, that's malpractice.
#4
Mist admit, I cringed when I saw the file.
Recently had a frame chased and faced (for good reason, and the first in a long time) and was gratified by the mech’s graceful handling of the facing process.
Recently had a frame chased and faced (for good reason, and the first in a long time) and was gratified by the mech’s graceful handling of the facing process.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#5
Edumacator




Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 9,624
Likes: 5,112
From: Goose Creek, SC
Bikes: More than the people who ride them...oy.
I always figured if the threads were perfectly aligned right and left, any paint residue would be mushed by the cups when tightened into nice and straight faces! 😬
__________________
1987 Crest C'dale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin EL, 1990 Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Isoard, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 C'dale M500, 1984 Mercian Pro, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi ?, 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh Internat'l, 1998 Corratec U+D, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone, 1987 Bianchi Volpe, 1995 Trek 750
1987 Crest C'dale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin EL, 1990 Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Isoard, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 C'dale M500, 1984 Mercian Pro, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi ?, 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super, 1971 Raleigh Internat'l, 1998 Corratec U+D, 1991 Peugeot Slimestone, 1987 Bianchi Volpe, 1995 Trek 750
#6
So if the flange of the fixed cup hits the face on one side only, it can take out the slop in one direction, skewing the cup. It is my firm belief that with quality parts, and any paint job better than the absolute worst, this effect is too small to worry about. Cup-and-cone angular contact bearings have an inherent tolerance for races that are slightly out of alignment. This is especially important since everything is flexing during hard pedaling, so even something that was in alignment at rest experiences contant misalignment as soon as you pedal.
Jobst Brandt once said something like "it's helpful to think of everything as made of varying hardnesses of rubber", sorry for probably mangling the quote. But we do need to remember that while steel is pretty stiff, it's not infinitely stiff. Even the smallest forces cause deflection and misalignment, just too small to worry about. I'll bet (with no math or testing), that the misalignment from paint over the BB face is way less than you get constantly from hard pedaling, like standing on the pedals to muscle up a short steep hill in too high of a gear.
The misalignment from varying paint film thickness is definitely too small to worry about, unless we're talking about the world's worst paint job, big runs or drips on one side of the face only, combined with a loose-fitting cup with lots of slop. Paint runs so big you could improve it with a box-cutter knife. I might use a file on such a face, but NEVER holding it at a 45° like that mook in the picture who seems to be trying to make a chamfer. And I'd only take down the paint a bit on the thick side, not removing all the paint. Steel frames should have paint on every surface exposed to the environment. Don't give rust an "in".






