Why do...
#26
Vello Kombi, baby

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,188
Likes: 16
From: Je suis ici
Bikes: 1973 Eisentraut; 1970s Richard Sachs; 1978 Alfio Bonnano; 1967 Peugeot PX10
To be fair to RVAs fixie riders, most of 'em don't do longish rides. The fixie is a pretty good/excellent urban machine if a) you knows how to handle 'em and b) the gradients aren't to steep. Easy to trackstand at lights, and you get a nice rythym, which I've found carries over to geared riding. I've been using an old UO8, fixified, as an urban beater for a long time. Lock it to a pole, leave it a few hours, if it gets nicked, there's a couple more frames in the basement. I wouldn't ride to Ashland on one, though I could. And someone prolly has.
As to my comments on coaster brakes, they should be pulled apart and repacked regular-like, and in the past I've found most folks think they're maintanence free, which they ain't. There's a reason the old downhill race was called "repack", and it had to do with coaster brakes and what happened to them going down the fire road. I've a coastie bike (a euro-style city bike), which I prolly ride 200 days a year, so I'm familiar with 'em. The coastie rarely get ridden more than a mile at a time, though. Used for donut runs.
As to the hypocrisy comments (the internet's fave accusation) I don't buy it. Again, there are older frames that are literally braze-on free, maybe a couple runs on the rear stay, nothing more. I know 'cause I've a room full of them. Hacking off a derailleur hanger is pointless. I can maybe understand the shifter bosses, but there's frames sans them, too. Go back to the conservator's credo: make sure you can undo any "improvements" you do. Nothin' hypocritical about that.
I agree with Merlin extra about the brakes... you have a resist brake at the rear; a hand brake up front is fine... this gives you a redundant brake system. Personally, brakes are like wheels on a bike: I like two.
As to my comments on coaster brakes, they should be pulled apart and repacked regular-like, and in the past I've found most folks think they're maintanence free, which they ain't. There's a reason the old downhill race was called "repack", and it had to do with coaster brakes and what happened to them going down the fire road. I've a coastie bike (a euro-style city bike), which I prolly ride 200 days a year, so I'm familiar with 'em. The coastie rarely get ridden more than a mile at a time, though. Used for donut runs.
As to the hypocrisy comments (the internet's fave accusation) I don't buy it. Again, there are older frames that are literally braze-on free, maybe a couple runs on the rear stay, nothing more. I know 'cause I've a room full of them. Hacking off a derailleur hanger is pointless. I can maybe understand the shifter bosses, but there's frames sans them, too. Go back to the conservator's credo: make sure you can undo any "improvements" you do. Nothin' hypocritical about that.
I agree with Merlin extra about the brakes... you have a resist brake at the rear; a hand brake up front is fine... this gives you a redundant brake system. Personally, brakes are like wheels on a bike: I like two.
__________________
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"
Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
"It's always darkest right before it goes completely black"
Waste your money! Buy my comic book!
#27
Gios my baby
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Bikes: Gios 96, Mercier 72, Peugeot 74 X 2, Sears full suspension High rise banana seat, Kona 94, CCM Rambler 70s.
Originally Posted by well biked
[/B]

I can definitely identify with that...........

I can definitely identify with that...........
#28
Gios my baby
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Bikes: Gios 96, Mercier 72, Peugeot 74 X 2, Sears full suspension High rise banana seat, Kona 94, CCM Rambler 70s.
Originally Posted by well biked
[/B]

I can definitely identify with that...........

I can definitely identify with that...........





