Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Odd C-Record chainring

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Odd C-Record chainring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-06 | 04:51 PM
  #1  
CV-6's Avatar
Thread Starter
If I own it, I ride it
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,685
Likes: 820
From: Cardinal Country

Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount

Odd C-Record chainring

This may have been more appropriate elsewhere, but I figure the people who will have the answer frequent this group. I bought what is represented as a C-Record 52T chainring. If I put it next to one I am certain is a C-Record, it has all the characteristics save one. The chainstop (the small metal stub that keeps the chain from wedging between the ring and the arm on an overshift) is not in line with one of the mounting holes. In other words it is in the wrong position and there is no way to move it where it should be located.

Any ideas what happened here? Is this not a C-Record ring? No real biggie if it is not...it was cheap and I got a nice 42 with it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
PC212248.JPG (40.1 KB, 22 views)
__________________
Please do not "like" my posts. This isn't Facebook.

Lynn Travers

Photos

CV-6 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 05:35 PM
  #2  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,398
Likes: 1,865
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

The chainstop should line up with the right crank. Campagnolo has used two different Record spider designs: the older familiar 5-arm layout, with the crank halfway between two bolts, and the current one, in which the crank itself IS the fifth arm of the spider. You have one ring representing each of these two applications.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 05:37 PM
  #3  
christiank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Based on the mentioned pin placement the top ring is not C Record. Maybe Croce D'Aune, Chorus or Athena.
christiank is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 05:43 PM
  #4  
christiank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Originally Posted by John E
The chainstop should line up with the right crank. Campagnolo has used two different Record spider designs: the older familiar 5-arm layout, with the crank halfway between two bolts, and the current one, in which the crank itself IS the fifth arm of the spider. You have one ring representing each of these two applications.
Really? I just looked through all the Campy catalogs from 1984 to 2006. All Record cranks had the fifth bolt (and pin) behind the arm.
christiank is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 05:44 PM
  #5  
Dr.Deltron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
+1! What John E said. The top ring is Super Record and the bottom one could be C-Record
or Croce Duan (sp) or Athena.
 
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 05:47 PM
  #6  
Dr.Deltron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by christiank
Really? I just looked through all the Campy catalogs from 1984 to 2006. All Record cranks had the fifth bolt (and pin) behind the arm.
I have several Super Record cranks and the pin is behind the arm, but the chainring bolts are not. And I know for sure that at least one set is an '84.
 
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 06:12 PM
  #7  
TMB's Avatar
TMB
Permanent Refugee .......
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
From: Okanagan Valley, BC.

Bikes: Steel

Originally Posted by John E
The chainstop should line up with the right crank. Campagnolo has used two different Record spider designs: the older familiar 5-arm layout, with the crank halfway between two bolts, and the current one, in which the crank itself IS the fifth arm of the spider. You have one ring representing each of these two applications.

+3 ......

No more to add
TMB is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 06:35 PM
  #8  
CV-6's Avatar
Thread Starter
If I own it, I ride it
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,685
Likes: 820
From: Cardinal Country

Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount

Well, after looking at my catalogs, I think I have some answers for my question.

Originally Posted by Dr.Deltron
+1! What John E said. The top ring is Super Record and the bottom one could be C-Record
or Croce Duan (sp) or Athena.

Originally Posted by John E
The chainstop should line up with the right crank. Campagnolo has used two different Record spider designs: the older familiar 5-arm layout, with the crank halfway between two bolts, and the current one, in which the crank itself IS the fifth arm of the spider. You have one ring representing each of these two applications.
The bottom ring is C-Record. The top ring is not Super Record. SR is 144BCD, this one is 135BCD. The ring in question (the top one) does fit the C-Record crank I have. Looking at one of my Campy catalogs, I see now that the ring in question is probably Croce or Athena, as concluded by John E. Even though I cannot use the ring, I still got a 42 that I can use out of the deal. Hey Marty...want a 52 for your Croce on your Reus?
__________________
Please do not "like" my posts. This isn't Facebook.

Lynn Travers

Photos

CV-6 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 07:31 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 21,814
Likes: 3,720
Record, aka Corsa Record started the Record design element with the crankarm locating one chainring bolt. "CdR" and or Chorus put the arm between the chainring bolts.

I do not recall seeing any Corsa Record rings with the "shift pins" around the perimeter of the ring, I think that started with the advent of Ergo, No?
repechage is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 07:45 PM
  #10  
cudak888's Avatar
www.theheadbadge.com
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,015
Likes: 5,509
From: Southern Florida

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Originally Posted by christiank
Really? I just looked through all the Campy catalogs from 1984 to 2006. All Record cranks had the fifth bolt (and pin) behind the arm.
With the exception of C-Record Pista, which is of no matter in this case, as the ring in question is a road ring.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 07:49 PM
  #11  
cudak888's Avatar
www.theheadbadge.com
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,015
Likes: 5,509
From: Southern Florida

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Originally Posted by CV-6
The top ring is not Super Record.
I'll back you up 1000% on that. Never was there an SR ring in existence that looked like that, and save for a few Sugino rings, I've never seen that design in 144bcd either.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 08:00 PM
  #12  
CV-6's Avatar
Thread Starter
If I own it, I ride it
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,685
Likes: 820
From: Cardinal Country

Bikes: Lejeune(14), Raleigh, Raysport, Jan De Reus, Gazelle, Masi, B. Carré(4), Springfield, Greg Lemond, Andre Bertin, Schwinn Paramount

I guess my ignorance of post mid-80s Campy is being shown. The crank I have which I have been calling C-Record is in fact Record from around 1991. How do I now know this? It was identified to me by its seller as Century finish. So repechage is correct in saying the ring is not C-record. He is also correct in pointing out the shift pins as showing up later. So what I have probably is a Record crank from around 1991 with rings from a later year. I generically lump the later Campy Record as C-Record. My bad on that.
__________________
Please do not "like" my posts. This isn't Facebook.

Lynn Travers

Photos

CV-6 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-06 | 10:44 PM
  #13  
christiank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Originally Posted by CV-6
So what I have probably is a Record crank from around 1991 with rings from a later year. I generically lump the later Campy Record as C-Record. My bad on that.
For the most part the original C-Record design for the crank arms, front derailleur, front hub and seatpost last from 1984 to 1994 so I would say you are safe saying your 1991 cranks are C-Record.
christiank is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.