Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

7 Speed freewheel width?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

7 Speed freewheel width?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-07 | 04:42 PM
  #1  
Kinetikx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eater of carbs
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach

Bikes: 1989 Trek 330

7 Speed freewheel width?

In my ever continuing quest to bring my '81 Univega into the 21st century I keep running into snags-

I have been arbitrarily planning to use a 7 speed freewheel with this build and didn't know if it would work until I got a properly spaced hub for the rear wheel. So I got my 126mm Shimano 600 hub finally and threw an old no-name 7 speed freewheel from an old mountain bike onto it and tried to fit it into the frame- no go. It rubs against the dropouts (or more correctly against the backing plate of the adaptor claw).
Out come the calipers- this freewheel is about 36mm wide. So I check the only other freewheel I have for comparison- a 6 speed Shimano and it is roughly 30mm wide. Even though I haven't threaded the 6 speed onto the hub I'm sure it would work much better.

So my question is: Are most 7 speed freewheels about the same width as the one in question or could I find one smaller which may work?

I'm certainly not dedicated to using a 7 speed so going with fewer cogs isn't a big deal- but I am going to be using an 8 speed Shimano 600/Ultegra RD which in theory will work fine with 6 speeds (I will be running with friction shifting)- I just don't know how well I will be able to adjust the limit stops for a 6 speed. Also chainline may be an issue with the seatstay/dropout, though I won't know for sure until I actually mount the cranks and put on a chain.
Kinetikx is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-07 | 04:49 PM
  #2  
intron's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 349
Likes: 52
i think if you can find it, a suntour ultra spaced 7 speed freewheel should work. i'm pretty sure the freewheel body is the width of a standard six speed but has thinner spacers to squeeze in 1 more cog. thus, making it a 7 speed.

for example: https://cgi.ebay.com/SUNTOUR-WINNER-7...QQcmdZViewItem

intron is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-07 | 05:26 PM
  #3  
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
Really Old Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 14,667
Likes: 1,904
From: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Will a flat washer or 2 on the drive side help?
Bill Kapaun is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-07 | 06:08 PM
  #4  
Kinetikx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eater of carbs
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach

Bikes: 1989 Trek 330

Originally Posted by Bill Kapaun
Will a flat washer or 2 on the drive side help?
Quite possibly. Though if I had to do that I would rather go with a 6 speed and deal with fiddling with the limit stops on the RD.
Kinetikx is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-07 | 07:49 PM
  #5  
vpiuva's Avatar
*
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 2
A seven speed road freewheel should be 31.85mm from the outside to outside of the cogs (5mm spacing cog/cog c-c). This is about 3mm wider than a standard spaced 6 speed (5.3mm spacing) I'm not familiar with MTB equipment but could they be wider? 36mm is too wide for a road 7 speed. Chainline should not be an issue, and your derailleur will handle it easily.
vpiuva is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-07 | 09:54 PM
  #6  
John E's Avatar
feros ferio
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,411
Likes: 1,876
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

My own experience is consistent with vpiuva's observations. For most hub-and-freewheel combinations, you need 120mm overlock for a standard 5-speed, 122mm for an ultra 6-speed, 126mm for a standard 6-speed and 128mm for a 7-speed (all of which are "ultra" spaced). You can often cheat by a couple of mm either way, through judicious use of spacers and washers.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-07 | 02:52 PM
  #7  
Road Fan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by John E
My own experience is consistent with vpiuva's observations. For most hub-and-freewheel combinations, you need 120mm overlock for a standard 5-speed, 122mm for an ultra 6-speed, 126mm for a standard 6-speed and 128mm for a 7-speed (all of which are "ultra" spaced). You can often cheat by a couple of mm either way, through judicious use of spacers and washers.
After much moaning, grinding and cursing, I spaced out my hub to 128 to make my 7-speed work on my Woodrup frame. John E. has it right.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-07 | 03:41 PM
  #8  
Kinetikx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eater of carbs
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach

Bikes: 1989 Trek 330

Thanks for all of the valuable information everyone. My decision is pretty clear. 6 speed it is. It's not like I use very many gears while I commute anyway. With every new part or problem I get on this bike I gain loads of knowledge- thanks to all of you.
Kinetikx is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-07 | 08:43 PM
  #9  
OLDYELLR's Avatar
My bikes became Vintage
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 13
From: Ontario, Canada
When I put a 7-speed on my Nishiki Ultimate, the chain also rubbed the dropout and I had to add about 1 mm of washers behind the locknut on the drive side for clearance. Here is the original 6-speed Suntour freewheel, the current 7-speed Shimano twist tooth freewheel and a Shimano 6-speed twist tooth freewheel I also tried showing their dimensions.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
fw_dims.jpg (96.1 KB, 164 views)
OLDYELLR is offline  
Reply
Old 03-30-07 | 09:09 PM
  #10  
Kinetikx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Eater of carbs
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Daytona Beach

Bikes: 1989 Trek 330

Very good illustration OLDYELLR. For people like me who are very visually oriented this is especially helpful.

Originally Posted by OLDYELLR
When I put a 7-speed on my Nishiki Ultimate, the chain also rubbed the dropout and I had to add about 1 mm of washers behind the locknut on the drive side for clearance.
If you don't mind I would like to see a picture of the way you did this. My problem is that on all of the freewheels I've seen there is a large void between the axle and the rest of the freewheel and I can't quite figure out where the washers should be placed (and what size washers for that matter). So even though I have decided to go with a smaller freewheel- I'm sure that I would appreciate seeing this theory in practice (as would people doing searches in the future).

Thanks.
Kinetikx is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-07 | 07:30 AM
  #11  
OLDYELLR's Avatar
My bikes became Vintage
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 13
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Kinetikx
I can't quite figure out where the washers should be placed (and what size washers for that matter).
I don't have a picture and would have to remove the freewheel to show where the washers are. However, I'll explain it using the picture below. I found 2 washers, each about .020" thick, the same diameter as the aluminum spacer. I drilled them out to fit over the axle between the spacer and the locknut on the right. This made the between-locknut dimension of the hub about 1 mm wider, but it still slipped in between the dropouts without much coaxing.



Here is the link to where I found this picture.
OLDYELLR is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-07 | 09:39 AM
  #12  
Little Darwin's Avatar
The Improbable Bulk
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,379
Likes: 7
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA

Bikes: Many

Some people are picky about wheel dish etc. Just to keep the rear wheel placement near ideal, I would add a washer on both sides in order to kep the wheel centered between the drop outs while creating the extra clearance on the drive side.

__________________
Slow Ride Cyclists of NEPA

People do not seem to realize that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Little Darwin is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-07 | 10:16 AM
  #13  
OLDYELLR's Avatar
My bikes became Vintage
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 13
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Little Darwin
Some people are picky about wheel dish etc. Just to keep the rear wheel placement near ideal, I would add a washer on both sides in order to kep the wheel centered between the drop outs while creating the extra clearance on the drive side.
Frankly, I couldn't see that the wheel was off-centre by 0.5mm with the naked eye, but if it helps you sleep better, add 1 mm of washers on the left as well. That would make it slightly harder to get the wheel between the dropouts.
OLDYELLR is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.