old sugino crank model?
#1
Thread Starter
member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Bikes: 1978 Schwinn Le Tour III and a 1984 Trek 610
old sugino crank model?
i have old sugino cranks with a built in chainguard and a 52t chainring that is unremovable. i haven't been able to find anything online about these cranks and would love to know some history and if they're worth anything. hopefully, someone on this forum knows.
It seems strange that i would be unable to remove the chainring and chaingurad. the chainring bolt holes seems awfully small as well.
i have pictures of the crankset here.
thanks for your help,
bryan
It seems strange that i would be unable to remove the chainring and chaingurad. the chainring bolt holes seems awfully small as well.
i have pictures of the crankset here.
thanks for your help,
bryan
#2
Kinda looks like the crank I pulled off a 80's something Schwinn World Sport. I've still got the crank, it didn't appear to be made very well. Compared with the Sugino Idol crank I used to replace it, from a 80's something Maruishi.
#3
feros ferio

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 22,411
Likes: 1,876
From: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
You have a successor to Sugino's low-end Maxy line, which first appeared ca. 1972, with a permanently mounted 52T outer ring (boo, hiss), a swaged spider (boo, hiss), and a solid spindle which took nuts, rather than bolts, at each end (boo, hiss).
I suppose I am not a fan ...
I suppose I am not a fan ...
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#4
Thread Starter
member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Bikes: 1978 Schwinn Le Tour III and a 1984 Trek 610
thanks john,
you're right, im not so excited about these, but i wanted to find some info before selling them. you dont happen to know the model number do you? also, how much do you think these cranks would go for? obviously not for much based on your original reaction to them.
you're right, im not so excited about these, but i wanted to find some info before selling them. you dont happen to know the model number do you? also, how much do you think these cranks would go for? obviously not for much based on your original reaction to them.
#5
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,212
Likes: 3,123
The crankset is similar to the Sugino Aero 5, but not identical. Based on the numbers on the back of the spider, I would assume it to be an Aero 7. The Aero 5 was found on 1980s, entry level models, so the Aero 7 should be on comparable models. There is little value in these cranks.
The integral chainguard and permanently attached large chainring are cost reduction designs. A separate chainguard would require an extra, very expensive mould. It is also less expensive to design the large chainring mounting pins into the spider and peen them with one hit of a press than it is to buy five bolt sets and assemble them by hand. Since the large chainring is permanently attached, steel is used because it wears better and is less costly.
The integral chainguard and permanently attached large chainring are cost reduction designs. A separate chainguard would require an extra, very expensive mould. It is also less expensive to design the large chainring mounting pins into the spider and peen them with one hit of a press than it is to buy five bolt sets and assemble them by hand. Since the large chainring is permanently attached, steel is used because it wears better and is less costly.





