Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Wrights vs. Brooks Saddle

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Wrights vs. Brooks Saddle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-08 | 07:05 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Full Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 27
Wrights vs. Brooks Saddle

Newbie question here, but what are the major differences between older Brooks vs. Wrights saddles? I've seen Brooks saddles listed on the Bay for a decent amount of money...I haven't seen many Wrights saddles, and the ones I do are cheap (compared to a Brooks). Are Brooks of a higher quality? I thought I read somewhere that Brooks once owned Wrights...(or vice-versa?)

Just curious is all....thanks for the input...!
ohjonnybegoode is offline  
Reply
Old 06-11-08 | 07:39 PM
  #2  
Vintage French Bike Fan
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: Peugeot UO-8, Peugeot 80's 12 spd

I don't know if Brooks actually owned Wrights at any point, but both were certainly associated with Raleigh's family of businesses. I believe SunRace actually now owns the Wrights name as part of the purchase of Sturmey-Archer, though SunRace do not make any products with the Wrights label that I know of.

As for the quality, I run several Wrights W3N saddles and have been very happy with them. YMMV. IMHO they are every bit as good as classic Brooks, but that's my opinion.

Karl
karmat is offline  
Reply
Old 06-11-08 | 08:49 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,936
Likes: 0
Wright saddles were Brooks' less expensive line. They came on lower end Raleighs, among others. Very similar to a Brooks but given that they were an economy model, they don't have much value today. I rode one for years without any problem, but it did eventually become an ass hatchet with a sharp ridge down the middle.
Longfemur is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-08 | 04:50 AM
  #4  
wahoonc's Avatar
Membership Not Required
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 18
From: On the road-USA

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

From what I can recall Wright's started out as a separate company and was purchased by Brooks along the way. I have a couple of Wrights and the quality is certainly equal to the Brooks. One I have ridden for over 30 years and it was gently used when I purchased it out of the LBS bargain bin.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-08 | 09:01 AM
  #5  
Vintage French Bike Fan
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: Peugeot UO-8, Peugeot 80's 12 spd

Originally Posted by wahoonc
From what I can recall Wright's started out as a separate company and was purchased by Brooks along the way. I have a couple of Wrights and the quality is certainly equal to the Brooks. One I have ridden for over 30 years and it was gently used when I purchased it out of the LBS bargain bin.

Aaron
Yeah, that's consistent with what I have read, too.

Karl
karmat is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-08 | 09:32 AM
  #6  
lotek's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 12
From: n.w. superdrome

Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa

my current favourite saddle is a Wrights Swallow, it was produced
by Brooks, has a few minor differences in the leather (different method
of supporting the top, thinner leather) but has the same frame as brooks,
just not finished as nicely.
Overall a decent saddle if properly cared for.

marty
__________________
Sono pił lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.


Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
lotek is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-08 | 02:53 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 109
The biggest general difference is the thinner lesser quality of the leather used in the Wrights to control costs. Roger
rhenning is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-08 | 03:01 PM
  #8  
wahoonc's Avatar
Membership Not Required
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 18
From: On the road-USA

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Originally Posted by rhenning
The biggest general difference is the thinner lesser quality of the leather used in the Wrights to control costs. Roger
Must be why it is so comfortable

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Reply
Old 06-12-08 | 05:31 PM
  #9  
Vintage French Bike Fan
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: Peugeot UO-8, Peugeot 80's 12 spd

Originally Posted by rhenning
The biggest general difference is the thinner lesser quality of the leather used in the Wrights to control costs. Roger
This is also not necessarily true. I have three Wrights saddles and only one of them (chrome rails) has thinner leather than a Brooks (or the other Wrights saddles that I have). I think you'll find a huge variation across both Brooks and Wrights product ranges with regard to "lesser quality", too.

Karl
karmat is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.